Modular chemosensors from self-assembled vesicle membranes with amphiphilic binding sites and reporter dyes

Angewandte Chemie - International Edition

Volumn 49, Issue 39, 2010, Pages 7125-7128

  Gruber, Benjamin ^a   Stadlbauer, Stefan ^a   Späth, Andreas ^a   Weiss, Stefan ^a   Kalinina, Maria ^b   König, Burkhard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF REGENSBURG   (Germany)

^b FRUMKIN INSTITUTE OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY AND ELECTROCHEMISTRY   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

Artificial receptors; Environment sensitive dyes; Fluorescence spectroscopy; Molecular recognition; Vesicles

Indexed keywords

AMPHIPHILICS; ANALYTES; ARTIFICIAL RECEPTORS; CHEMO-SENSORS; EMISSION INTENSITY; ENVIRONMENT-SENSITIVE; FLUORESCENT PARTICLE; SELF-ASSEMBLED; SELF-ASSEMBLED VESICLES; VESICLES;

BINDING ENERGY; BIOCHEMISTRY; FLUORESCENCE; FLUORESCENCE SPECTROSCOPY; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION;

BINDING SITES;

EID: 77956939666     PISSN: 14337851     EISSN: 15213773     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/anie.201001101     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. a) M. Kruppa, B. König, Chem. Rev. 2006, 106, 3520-3560
2. b) A. Ojida, Y. Mitooka, M. Inoue, I. Hamachi, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 6256-6258.
3. a) S. K. Kim, D. H. Lee, J. I. Hong, J. Yoon, Acc. Chem. Res. 2009, 42, 23-31
4. b) R. Martínez-Máñez, F. Sancenon, Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 4419-4476.
5. B. T. Nguyen, E. V. Anslyn, Coord. Chem. Rev. 2006, 250, 3118-3127.
6. a) D. A. Jose, S. Stadlbauer, B. König, Chem. Eur. J. 2009, 15, 7404-7412
7. b) D. A. Jose, B. König, Org. Biomol. Chem. 2010, 8, 655-662
8. c) B. Gruber, S. Stadlbauer, K. Woinaroschy, B. Konig, Org. Biomol. Chem. 2010, 8, 3704-3714.
9. T. Parasassi, E. K. Krasnowska, L. Bagatolli, E. Gratton, J. Fluoresc. 1998, 8, 365-373.
10. a)T. Takeuchi, S. Matile, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 18048-18049
11. b) S. Matile, H. Tanaka, S. Litvinchuk, Top. Curr. Chem. 2007, 277, 219-250
12. c) M. M. Tedesco, B. Ghebremariam, N. Sakai, S. Matile, Angew. Chem. 1999, 111, 523-526
13. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 540-543.
14. a) S. Mizukami, T. Nagano, Y. Urano, A. Odani, K. Kikuchi, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 3920-3925
15. b) S. Aoki, M. Zulkefeli, M. Shiro, M. Kohsako, K. Takeda, E. Kimura, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 9129-9139
16. c) E. Kimura, T. Shiota, T. Koike, M. Shiro, M. Kodama, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 5805-5811
17. d) T. Koike, S. Kajitani, I. Nakamura, E. Kimura, M. Shiro, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 1210-1219
18. e) E. Kimura, S. Aoki, T. Koike, M. Shiro, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 3068-3076.
19. a) C. P. Mandl, B. König, J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 670-674
20. b) A. Späth, B. König, Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 690-695.
21. D. S. Turygin, M. Subat, O. A. Raitman, V. V. Arslanov, B. König, M. A. Kalinina, Angew. Chem. 2006, 118, 5466-5470
22. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 5340-5344.
23. a) M. Przybylo, A. Olzynska, S. Han, A. Ozyhar, M. Langner, Biophys. Chem. 2007, 129, 120-125
24. b) M. Langner, H. Pruchnik, K. Kubica, Z. Naturforsch. C 2000, 55, 418-424.
25. A. Riechers, F. Schmidt, S. Stadlbauer, B. König, Bioconjugate Chem. 2009, 20, 804-807.
26. A interaction between receptor and dye with respect to analyte molecules could be modeled to some extent in a non-polar organic solvent that mimics the environment in the bilayer membrane (see the Supporting Information).
27. a) I. D. Alves, Z. Salamon, V. J. Hruby, G. Tollin, Biochemistry 2005, 44, 9168-9178
28. b) E. L. Elson, E. Fried, J. E. Dolbow, G. M. Genin, Annu. Rev. Biophys. 2010, 39, 207-226
29. c) K. Simons, W. L. C. Vaz, Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 2004, 33, 269-295.
30. a) M. Langner, J. Gabrielska, S. A. Przestalski, Appl. Organo- met. Chem. 2000, 14, 25-33
31. b) M. Langner, H. Kleszczynska, Cell. Mol. Biol. Lett. 1997, 2, 15-24.
32. The different responses can be explained on the basis of our suggested hypothesis. The carboxyfluorescein-derived dye presents rather bulky head groups that provide a comparatively large free volume, which contracts to a tight packing in homogeneous phase. When expelled from the receptor-ligand proximity during patch segregation, the molecular structure of the dye suggests that it tends to distribute more or less separately within the lipid-enriched phase surrounding the patch. This results in the emission increase owing to the enhanced freedom of movement of the dye. The coumarin-derived dye presents relatively compact aromatic heads, which can stack and form tightly arranged assemblies around the phosphate-bound patch during segregation, which causes self-quenching.
33. I. Paunovic, R. Schulin, B. Nowack, J. Chromatogr. A 2005, 1100, 176-184.
34. a) A. N. Kapanidis, Y. W. Ebright, R. H. Ebright, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 12123-12125
35. b) C. R. Goldsmith, J. Jaworski, M. Sheng, S. J. Lippard, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 418-419
36. This refers to the charge of the coordinated metal ion in the amphiphilic ligand, neglecting the counterion.
37. D. Hopgood, R. J. Angelici, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1968, 90, 2508-2513.
38. At present, data for a detailed phase-diagram plotting are not fully obtained; we are actively pursuing this goal.
39. a) K. Ariga, T. Kunitake, Acc. Chem. Res. 1998, 31, 371-378
40. b) R. Zadmard, T. Schrader, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 904-915
41. c) S. Kolusheva, O. Molt, M. Herm, T. Schrader, R. Jelinek, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 10000-10001
42. d) K. Ariga, A. Kamino, X. Cha, T. Kunitake, Langmuir 1999, 15, 3875-3885
43. e) N. Sakai, S. Matile, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 14348-14356.