Identifying elements of enterprise wide application selection eco-system

ISARC 2008 - Proceedings from the 25th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 810-816

  Skibniewski, Mirosław J ^a   Ghosh, S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

Compatibility; Ecology; Technology acceptance model; Usefulness

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; ROBOTICS;

COMPATIBILITY; DECISION MAKERS; NEW ENTERPRISE; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL; TECHNOLOGY SELECTION; USEFULNESS;

ECOLOGY;

EID: 77956930174     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3846/isarc.20080626.810     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (37)

1. Bagozzi, R.: The Legacy of the Technology Acceptance Model and a Proposal for a Paradigm Shift (Journal of the Association for Information Systems, Issue 4, Article 7.
2. Chung, BooYoung (2007):An analysis of success and failure factors for ERP systems in Engineering and Construction firms. PhD Thesis, University of Maryland, Project Management Program, University of Maryland, College, MD
3. Comrey and Lee's (1992): Higher-order exploratory factor analysis of the Reynolds Intellectual Assessment Scales with a referred sample: Journal of School Psychology Vol. 45, Issue 4, August 2007, Pages 439-456
4. D. Robey, J. W. Ross, and M.-C. Boudreau, "Learning to implement enterprise systems: An exploratory study of the dialectics of change," J. Manage. Inform. Syst., vol. 19, no. 1, 2002.
5. David Hosmer and Stanley Lemeshow: Applied Logistic Regression (Second Edition)
6. David L. Olson Evaluation of ERP outsourcing, Computers & Operations Research 34 (2007) 3715-3724
7. Doz, Y., Santos, J. and Williamson, P., "From Global to Metanational". Harvard Business School Press: 2001, ISBN 0-87584870-2
8. Ekanayaka et al. Evaluating application service providers, Benchmarking: An International Journal, Vol 10, No 4, 2003, pp 343-354
9. Elena Karahanna et al. Reconceptualizing Compatibility beliefs in Technology Acceptance Research, MIS Quarterly, Vol 30, No 4, Dec - 2006 pp 781-804 (Pubitemid 46051904)
10. Gad Ariav and Michael J. Ginzberg. Dss design: a systemic view of decision support.Communications of the ACM, 28(10):1045-1052, October 1985. (Pubitemid 15587966)
11. Ghosh S, and Ghosh, S: Critical success factors evaluating IT infrastructure: IEEE Engineeering Management Conference, Singapore, 2003
12. Hall, C.A.S., Day, J.W. Jr, 1977. Systems and models: terms and basic principles. In: Hall, C.A.S., Day, J.W. Jr (Eds.), Ecosystem Modeling in Theory and Practice: An Introduction with Case Histories. Wiley, New York, pp. 6-36.
13. J Lu, CS Yu, C Liu, JE Yao: Technology acceptance model for wireless Internet Author(s): Internet Research, 2003
14. J. Michael Pearson and J.P. Shim. An empirical investigation into decision support systems capabilities: a proposed taxonomy. Information & Management, 27(1):45-57, 1994.
15. Jack T. Hogue and Hugh J. Watson. An examination of decision-makers' utilization of decision support system output. Information &' Management, 8(4):205-212, April 1985.
16. Jackson, Pamela J.: Modeling The Individual Technology Adoption Decision: A Synthesis of the Quantitative and Qualitative Literature, 2006: UNC Chatlotte, eScholar Academic Research
17. Jerry Cha-Jan Chang and William R King: Measuring the Performance of Information Systems: A Functional Scorecard: Journal of Management Information Systems: Summer 2005, Vol 22, No 1, pp 85-115
18. JH Wu, SC Wang - Information & Management, 2005 - Elsevier "What drives mobile commerce? An empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model".
19. Kwasi Amoako-Gyampah and A. F. Salam: An extension of the technology acceptance model in an ERP implementation environment: Information & Management, Volume 41, Issue 6, July 2004, p. 731-745
20. Lee, A.S. "Integrating Positivist and Interpretive Approaches to Organizational Research," Organization Science (2), 1991, pp. 342-365.
21. M. Hammer, "Up the ERP revolution," Information week, p. 186, Feb, 1999.
22. Maarten Celderman (1997): Task difficulty, task variability and satisfaction with Management support system: Vrije Universiteit Research Memorandum, 1997-53.
23. Mankins, M. C. and Steele, R. (2005) Turning Great Strategy into Great Performance, Harvard Business Review, Harvard Business School. 83(1), pp 64-72
24. More, E. "Information Systems: People Issues," Journal of Information Science (16:5), 1990, pp. 311-320.
25. Morris, M.G. and Dillon, A. "How User Perceptions Influence Software Use," IEEE Software (14:4), 1997, pp. 58-65.
26. Morrison, Donald F. (1990) Multivariate Statistical Methods. New York: McGraw-Hill.
27. Orlikowski, W.J. and Baroudi, J.J. "Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions," Information Systems Research (2:1), 1991, pp. 1-26.
28. Ron Adner, Match Your nnovation Strategy to Your Innovation Ecosystem, HBR
29. Sharma and Yetton: The contingent effects of Training, Technical Complexity, and Task Interdependence on Successful Information Systems Implementation: MIS Quarterly Vol 31, No 2, pp 219-238
30. SL Zeger and KY Liang Longitudinal Data Analysis for Discrete and Continuous Outcomes, Biometrics, 1986 - JSTOR
31. Somers, T.M. and Nelson, K.L.: A taxonomy of players and activities across the ERP project life cycle: Information and Management, Vol 41(2004), pp 257-278
32. Tabachnick and Fidell : Computer-Assisted Reseach and Design Analysis Allyn & Bacon: (2001, page 588)
33. Tiwana, A and Mclean E.: Expertise Integration and Creativity in Information Systems Development, Journal of Management Information Systems /Summer 2005, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 13-43. (Pubitemid 41136749)
34. Venkatesh, V., and Davis, F. D. (2000). "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies." Management Science, INFORMS, 46(2), 186-204. (Pubitemid 30594361)
35. VIDYANAND CHOUDHARY, Comparison of Software Quality Under Perpetual Licensing and Software as a Service, Journal of Management Information Systems / Fall 2007, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 141-165.
36. Wenhong Luo and Diane M. Strong A Framework for Evaluating ERP Implementation Choices, Ieee Transactions On Engineering Management, Vol. 51, No. 3, August 2004
37. Woods, J. A. and McCurley, C. J. (2004, Apr) Design Effects in Complex Sampling Designs Paper presented at the annual meeting of the The Midwest Political Science Association, Palmer House Hilton, Chicago, Illinois 2006-10-05 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p83109-inde