Unfolding the measurement of the creative personality

Journal of Creative Behavior

Volumn 44, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 105-123

  Zampetakis, Leonidas A ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF CRETE   (Greece)

Author keywords

Creativity measurement; Greece; GUM; Ideal point models

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956913132     PISSN: 00220175     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/j.2162-6057.2010.tb01328.x     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. AMABILE, T. M. (1996). Creativity In context. Update to Social psychology of creativity. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
2. AMABILE, T. M., HILL, K. Q., HENNESSEY, B. A., & TIGHE, E. M. (1994). The Work Preference Inventory: Assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(5), 950-967.
3. ANDRICH, D. (1996). A hyperbolic cosine latent trait model for unfolding polytomous responses: Reconciling Thurstone and Likert methodologies. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 49, 347-365.
4. ANDRICH, D., & LUO, G. (1993). A hyperbolic cosine latent trait model for unfolding dichotomous single-stimulus responses. Applied Psychological Measurement, 17, 253-276.
5. ANDRICH, D., & STYLES, I. M. (1998). The structural relationship between attitude and behavior statements from the unfolding perspective. Psychological Methods 3(4), 454-469.
6. BAER, J. (1998). The case for domain specifity of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 11(2), 173-177.
7. BATEY, M., & FURNHAM, A. (2006). Creativity, Intelligence, and personality: A critical review of the scattered literature. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 132(4), 355-429.
8. BRISLIN, R. W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written material. In C. Triandis & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Handbook of cross cultural psychology (pp. 398-444). Boston Allyn & Bacon.
9. CARSON, S. H., PETERSON, J. B., & HIGG1NS, D. M. (2005). Reliability, validity, and factor structure of the creative achievement questionnaire. Creativity Research Journal, 17, 37-50.
10. CHERNYSHENKO, O. S., STARK, S., CHAN, K. Y., DRASGOW, F., & WILLIAMS, B. A. (2001). Fitting item response theory models to two personality inventories: Issues and insights. Multivariate Behavioural Research, 36(4), 523-562.
11. CHERNYSHENKO, O. S., STARK, S., DRASGOW, F., & ROBERTS, B. W. (2007). Constructing personality scales under the assumptions of an ideal-point response process: Toward increasing the flexibility of personality measures. Psychological Assessment, 19, 88-106.
12. COOMBS, C. H. (1964). A theory of data. New York: Wiley.
13. CROPLEY, A. J. (2000). Defining and Measuring Creativity: Are Creativity Tests Worth Using? Roeper Review, 23(2), 72-79.
14. DAVISON, M. L. (1977). On a metric, unidimensional unfolding model for attitudinal and developmental data. Psychometrlka, 42, 523-548.
15. DE LA TORRE, J., STARK, S., & CHERNYSHENKO, O. S. (2006). Markov Chain Monte Carlo estimation of item parameters for the Generalized Graded Unfolding Model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 216-232.
16. DAWSON, V. L, D'ANDREA, T., AFFINITO, R., & WESTBY, E. L. (1999). Predicting creative behavior: A re-examination of the divergence between traditional and teacher-defined concepts of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 12(1), 57-6.6
17. DOMINO, G. (1994). Assessment of creativity with the ACL: An empirical comparison of four scales. Creativity Research Journal, 7, 21-33.
18. DRASGOW, F., CHERNYSHENKO, O. S., & STARK, S. (2009). Test Theory and Personality Measurement. In Oxford Handbook of Personality Assessment (Chapter 4. pp. 59-80). London: Oxford University Press
19. DRASGOW, F., LEVINE, M. V., TSLEN, S., WILUAMS, B., & MEAD, A. (1995). Fitting polytomous item response theory models to multiple-choice tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 19,143" 165.
20. DOYLE, C.L. (1971). Honesty as a structurally necessary aspect of the creative process. Paper presented at American Psychological Association convention, Washington, D.C., September 3-7.
21. EMBRETSON, S. E., & REISE, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
22. EYSENCK, H. J. (1995). Gen/us. The natural history of creativity Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. FEIST, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review 2(4), 290-309.
24. GOUGH, H. G. (1979). A creative personality scale for the Adjective Check List. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37, 1398-1405.
25. GOUGH, H. G., & HEILBRUN, A. B. (1965). The Adjective Check List manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
26. HOCEVAR, D. (1981). Measurement of Creativity: Review and critique. Journal of Personality Assessment, 45(5), 450-464.
27. HOCEVAR, D., & BACHELOR, P. (1989). A taxonomy and critique of measurements used in the study of creativity. In J. A. Glover, R. R. Ronning & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of Creativity (pp. 53-76). New York: Plenum.
28. KAUFMAN, J. C, PLUCKER, J. A., & BAER, J. (2008). Essentials of creativity assessment. New York: Wiley.
29. LUO, G. (2000). Joint maximum likelihood estimation for the hyperbolic cosine model for single stimulus responses. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 33-49.
30. MYERS, I. B. (1962). The Myers-Brlggs Type Indicator. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
31. OLDHAM, G. R., & CÜMMLNGS, A. (1996). Employee creativity: personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 39(3), 607-634.
32. PLUCKER, J. A., BEGHETTO, R. A., & DOW, G. T. (2004). Why isn't creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potentials, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research. Educational Psychologist, 39(2), 83-96.
33. PLÜCKER, J. A., & RENZULLI, J. S. (1999). Psychometric approaches to the study of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of Human Creativity, (pp. 35-61). New York: Cambridge university Press.
34. ROBERTS, J. S., DONOGHÜE, J. R., & LAÜGHUN, J. E. (2000). A general item response theory model for unfolding unidimensional polytomous responses. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24,3" 32.
35. ROBERTS, J. S., DONOGHÜE, J. R., & LAÜGHUN, J. E. (2002). Characteristics of MML/EAP parameter estimates in the generalized graded unfolding model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 26, 192-207.
36. ROBERTS, J. S., FANG, H., CGI, W., & WANG, Y. (2006). GGCJM2004: A Windows-based program to estimate parameters of the generalized graded unfolding model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 30, 64-65.
37. ROBERTS, J. S., & LAOGHLIN, J. E. (1996). A unidimensional item response model for unfolding responses from a graded disagree-agree response scale. Applied Psychological Measurement, 20, 231-255.
38. RUNNCO, M. A. (2007). Creativity. Theories and Themes: Research, Development, and Practice. Amsterdam: Elsevier Academic Press.
39. SCHERBAÜM, C. A., FINUNSON, S., BARDEN, K., & TAMANINL, K. (2006). Applications of item response theory to measurement issues in leadership research. The Leadership Quarterly 17, 366-386.
40. STARK, S., CHERNYSHENKO, O. S., DRASGOW, F., & WILLIAMS, B. A. (2006). Examining assumptions about item responding in personality assessment: Should ideal point methods be considered for scale development and scoring? Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 25-39.
41. STERNBERG, R. J. (1985). Implicit theories of intelligence, creativity, and wisdom. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 49(3), 607-627.
42. STERNBERG, R. J. (2006). The nature of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 18(1), 87-98.
43. WEEKERS, A. M., & MELJER, R. R. (2008). Scaling response processes on personality items using unfolding and dominance models. An illustration with a Dutch dominance and unfolding personality inventory. European Journal of Psychological Assessment 24(1), 65-77.
44. ZAMPETAKIS, L. A. (2008). The role of creativity and proactivity on perceived entrepreneurial desirability. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 3, 154-162.
45. ZAMPETAKIS, L. A., & MOUSTAKIS, V. (2006). Linking creativity with entrepreneurial intentions: A structural approach. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 2(3), 413-426.
46. ZAMPETAKIS, L A., TSIRONIS, L., & MOUSTAKIS, V. (2007). Creativity development in engineering education: The case of mind mapping. Journal of Management Development, 24(6), 370-380.