High-order incompressible large-eddy simulation of fully inhomogeneous turbulent flows

Journal of Computational Physics

Volumn 229, Issue 23, 2010, Pages 8802-8822

  Shetty, Dinesh A ^a   Fisher, Travis C ^a   Chunekar, Aditya R ^a   Frankel, Steven H ^a  

^a Purdue University   (United States)

Author keywords

Driven cavity; High order finite difference; Incompressible; Large eddy simulation; Smagorinsky model; Vreman model; WENO

Indexed keywords

REYNOLDS NUMBER; TURBULENT FLOW;

DIRECT NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS DATUM; DRIVEN CAVITY; HIGH-ORDER; HIGHER ORDER FINITE DIFFERENCES; HIGHER-ORDER; INCOMPRESSIBLE; LARGE-EDDY SIMULATIONS; SMAGORINSKY MODEL; VREMAN MODEL; WENO;

LARGE EDDY SIMULATION;

EID: 77956903706     PISSN: 00219991     EISSN: 10902716     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2010.08.011     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Vreman A. An eddy-viscosity subgrid-scale model for turbulent shear flow: algebraic theory and applications. Phys. Fluids 2004, 16:3670-3681.
2. Park N., Lee S., Lee J., Choi H. A dynamic subgrid-scale eddy-viscosity model with a global model coefficient. Phys. Fluids 2006, 18. 125109-125109-24.
3. You D., Moin P. A dynamic global-coefficient subgrid-scale eddy-viscosity model for large-eddy simulation in complex geometries. Phys. Fluids 2007, 19. 065110-065110-8.
4. Ghosal S., Lund T., Moin P., Akselvoll K. A dynamic localization model for large-eddy simulation of turbulent flows. J. Fluid Mech. 1995, 286:229-255.
5. Meneveau C., Lund T.S., Cabot W.H. A lagrangian dynamic subgrid-scale model of turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 1996, 319:353-385.
6. Ghia U., Ghia K., Shin C. High-Re solutions for incompressible flow using the Navier-Stokes equations and a multigrid method. J. Comput. Phys. 1982, 48:387-411.
7. P.N. Shankar, M.D. Deshpande, Fluid mechanics in the driven cavity, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 32 (2000) 93-136.
8. J.R. Koseff, R.L. Street, The lid-driven cavity flow: a synthesis of qualitative and quantitative observations, J. Fluid Mech. 106 (1984) 390-398.
9. Prasad A.K., Koseff J. Reynolds number and end-wall effects on a lid-driven cavity flow. Phys. Fluids A 1989, 1:208-218.
10. R. Iwatsu, K. Ishii, T. Kawamura, K. Kuwahara, J. Hyun, Simulation of transition to turbulence in a cubic cavity, AIAA, Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 27th, Reno, NV (AIAA-89-0040).
11. Chiang T.P., Sheu W. Numerical prediction of eddy structure in a shear driven cavity. Comput. Mech. 1997, 20:379-396.
12. Leriche E., Gavrilakis S. Direct numerical simulation of the flow in a lid-driven cubical cavity. Phys. Fluids 2000, 12:1363-1376.
13. Leriche E. Direct numerical simulation in a lid-driven cubical cavity at high reynolds number by a Chebyshev spectral method. J. Sci. Comput. 2006, 27:335-345.
14. Bouffanais R., Deville M., Leriche E. Large-eddy simulation of the flow in a lid-driven cubical cavity. Phys. Fluids 2007, 19:1-20.
15. R. Bouffanais, M. Deville, P. Fischer, E. Leriche, D. Weill, Large-eddy simulation of the lid-driven cubic cavity flow by the spectral element method, J. Sci. Comput. 27 (2006) 151-162.
16. Mahesh K., Constantinescu G., Moin P. A numerical method for large-eddy simulation in complex geometries. J. Comput. Phys. 2004, 197:90-124.
17. Laizet S., Lamballais E. High-order compact schemes for incompressible flows: a simple and efficient method with quasi-spectral accuracy. J. Comput. Phys. 2009, 228:5989-6015.
18. Kampanis N., Ekaterinaris J.A. A staggered grid, high-order accurate method for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. J. Comput. Phys. 2006, 215:598-613.
19. Gokarn A., Battaglia F., Fox R.O., Hill J., Reveillon J. Large-eddy simulations of incompressible turbulent flows using parallel computing techniques. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids 2008, 56:1819-1843.
20. Zhang J., Jackson T.L. A high-order incompressible flow solver with weno. J. Comput. Phys. 2009, 228:2426-2442.
21. Saarbrucken V. Jone On large-eddy simulation and variational multiscale methods in the numerical simulation of turbulent incompressible flows. Appl. Math. 2006, 51(4):321-353.
22. Latini M., Schilling O., Don W. Effects of weno flux reconstruction order and spatial resolution on reshocked two-dimensional Richtmyer-Meshkov instability. J. Comput. Phys. 2007, 221(2):805-836.
23. Zhang Y.-T., Shi J., Shu C.-W., Zhou Y. Numerical viscosity and resolution of high-order weighted essentially nonoscillatory schemes for compressible flows with high reynolds numbers. Phys. Rev. E 2003, 68(046709):1-16.
24. Martin M., Taylor E., Weirs V. A bandwidth-optimized weno scheme for the effective direct numerical simulation of compressible turbulence. J. Comput. Phys. 2006, 220(1):270-289.
25. Pirozzoli S. Conservative hybrid compact-weno schemes for shock-turbulence interaction. J. Comput. Phys. 2002, 178:81-117.
26. Johnsen E., Larsson J., Bhagatwala A., Cabot W.H., Moin P., Olson B.J., Rawat P., Shankar S., Jjogreen B., Yee H.C., Zhong X., Lele S. Assessment of high-resolution methods for numerical simulations of compressible turbulence with shock waves. J. Comput. Phys. 2010, 229(4):1213-1237.
27. Mittal R., Moin P. Suitability of upwind-biased finite difference schemes for large-eddy simulation of turbulent flows. AIAA 1997, 35(8):1415-1417.
28. Pope S.B. Turbulent Flows 2000, Cambridge University Press.
29. Smagorinsky J. General circulation experiments with the primitive equations. i. the basic experiment. Monthly Weather Rev. 1963, 91:99-164.
30. D.K. Lilly, The representation of small-scale turbulence in numerical simulation experiments, in: Proceedings of IBM Scientific Computing Symposium Environmental Sciences (IBM Form No. 320-1951), 1967, pp. 195-210.
31. Sagaut P. Large-eddy Simulation for Incompressible Flows-an Introduction 2004, Springer. second ed.
32. B. Gustafsson, High Order Difference Methods for Time Dependent PDE, Springer Series in Computational Mathematics, 2000.
33. Jiang G., Shu C.W. Efficient implementation of weighted eno schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 1996, 126:202-228.
34. Morinishi Y., Lund T.S., Vasilyev O.V., Moin P. Fully conservative higher-order finite difference schemes for incompressible flow. J. Comput. Phys. 1998, 143:90-124.
35. Tannehill J.C., Anderson D.A., Pletcher R.H. Computational Fluid Mechanics and Heat Transfer 1997, Taylor & Francis.
36. Guermond J., Minev P., Shen J. An overview of projection methods for incompressible flows. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 2006, 195:6011-6045.
37. Adams J. Mudpack: multigrid fortran software for the efficient solution of linear elliptic partial differential equations. Appl. Math. Comput. 1989, 34:113-146.
38. Loh K.C., Domaradzki J.A. The subgrid-scale estimation model on non-uniform grids. Phys. Fluids 1999, 11(12):3786-3792.
39. Bahramian F., Straatman A.G. A volume-based discrete test filter for conducting large-eddy simulations with application to physiological flow in a constricted tube. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids 2009.
40. Available from: http://openmp.org/wp/.
41. R.J. McDermott, Toward one-dimensional turbulence subgrid closure for large-eddy simulation, Ph.D. thesis, The University of Utah, 2005.
42. Jeong J., Hussain F. On the identification of a vortex. J. Fluid Mech. 1995, 285:69-94.
43. Park N., Yoo J.Y., Choi H. Discretization errors in large-eddy simulation: on the suitability of centered and upwind-biased compact difference schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 2004, 198(2):580-616.
44. Chandy A., Frankel S. Assessment of regularization-based sub-grid scale models for large-eddy simulations of decaying isotropic turbulence. J. Turbulence 2009, 10(25):1-22.
45. Drikakis D., Fureby C., Fernando F., David Y. Simulation of transition and turbulence decay in the Taylor-Green vortex. J. Turbul. 2007, 8(20):1-12.
46. D. Choi, D. Prasad, M. Wang, C. Pierce, Evaluation of an industrial cfd code for les applications, in: Proceedings of the Summer Program, 2007, pp. 221-228 (Center for Turbulence Research).