Buddhist idealism, epistemic and otherwise: Thoughts on the alternating perspectives of Dharmakīrti

Sophia

Volumn 47, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 3-28

  Arnold, Dan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Dharmak rti; Epistemology; Idealism; Yog c ra

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956885319     PISSN: 00381527     EISSN: 1873930X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11841-008-0046-7     Document Type: Review

References (35)

1. Arnold, D. (2005). Is svasam: vitti transcendental? A tentative reconstruction following Śāntaraks: ita. Asian Philosophy, 15/1, 77-111.
2. Arnold, D. (2008a). Dharmakīrti and Dharmottara on the intentionality of perception: Selections from 'an epitome of philosophy' (Nyāyabindu). In J. Garfield & W. Edelglass (Eds.) Buddhist philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press. (forthcoming).
3. Arnold, D. (2008b). Svasam: vitti as methodological solipsism: 'Narrow content' and the problem of intentionality in Buddhist philosophy of mind. In J. Garfield, M. D'Amato & T. Tillemans (Eds.), Pointing at the moon: Buddhism, logic, analytic philosophy. (forthcoming).
4. Arnold, D. (2008c). Madhyamaka critiques of epistemology. In M. Kapstein (Ed.) The Columbia guide to Indian philosophy. New York: Columbia University Press. (forthcoming).
5. Brentano, F. (1973). Psychology from an empirical standpoint. Ed. O. Kraus; translated by Antos C.
6. Rancurello, D. B. Terrell, and Linda L. McAlister. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
7. Cabezón, J. (1990). The canonization of philosophy and the rhetoric of Siddhānta in Indo-Tibetan Buddhism. In P. Griffiths & J. Keenan (Eds.) Buddha nature: A festschrift in honor of Minoru Kiyota (pp. 7-26). Reno, Nevada: Buddhist Books International.
8. Davidson, D. (2001). Subjective, intersubjective, objective. New York: Oxford University Press.
9. Dreyfus, G. (1996). Can the fool lead the blind? Perception and the given in Dharmakīrti's thought. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 24, 209-229.
10. Dreyfus, G. (1997). Recognizing reality: Dharmakīrti's philosophy and its Tibetan interpreters. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
11. Dreyfus, G. (2007). Is perception intentional? A preliminary exploration of intentionality in Dharmakīrti. In B. Kellner, et al. (Ed.) Pramān: akīrti : Papers dedicated to Ernst Steinkellner on the occasion of his 70th Birthday. Part 1 (pp. 95-113). Wien: Arbeitskreis für Tibetische und Buddhistische Studien Universität Wien.
12. Dreyfus, G., & Lindtner, C. (1989). The Yogācāra philosophy of Dignāga and Dharmakīrti. Studies in Central and East Asian Religions (Journal of the Seminar for Buddhist Studies, Copenhagen and Aarhus), 2, 27-52.
13. Dunne, J. (2004). Foundations of Dharmakīrti's philosophy. Boston: Wisdom Publications.
14. Ganeri, J. (1999). Self-intimation, memory and personal identity. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 27, 469-483.
15. Gnoli, R. (Ed.) (1960). The Pramān: avārttikam of Dharmakīrti: The first chapter with the autocommentary: Text and critical notes. Serie Orientale Roma, XXIII. Rome: Istituto Italiano per il Medio ed Estremo Oriente.
16. Griffiths, P. (1986). On being mindless: Buddhist meditation and the mind-body problem. LaSalle, IL: Open Court.
17. Hattori, M. (1968). Dignāga, on perception, being the Pratyaks:apariccheda of Dignāga's Pramān: asamuccaya from the Sanskrit fragments and the Tibetan versions. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
18. Hayes, R. P. (1988). Dignāga on the interpretation of signs. Dordrecht: Kluwer Studies in Classical India, 9.
19. Kant, I. (1781, 1787). Critique of pure reason. Translated by Norman Kemp Smith. Unabridged edition. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1965.
20. Kapstein, M. (2001). Mereological considerations in Vasubandhu's 'Proof of idealism'. Reason's traces: Identity and interpretation in Indian & Tibetan Buddhist thought pp. 181-204. Boston: Wisdom Publications.
21. Kolbert, E. (2007). Crash course: Can a seventeen-mile-long collider unlock the universe? The New Yorker, May 14, 2007; available online at http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2007/05/14/070514fa-fact-kolbert.
22. Lusthaus, D. (2002). Buddhist phenomenology: A philosophical investigation of Yogācāra and the Ch'eng Wei-shih lun. New York: RoutledgeCurzon.
23. McDowell, J. (1996). Mind and world: With a new introduction. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
24. McDowell, J. (1997). What myth? Inquiry, 50/4, 338-351.
25. McDowell, J. (1998a). The content of perceptual experience. Mind, value, and reality pp. 341-358. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
26. McDowell, J. (1998b). Knowledge and the internal. In Meaning, Knowledge, & Reality (pp. 395-413). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27. Ram-Prasad, C. (2002). Advaita epistemology and metaphysics: An outline of Indian non-realism. London: RoutledgeCurzon.
28. Sam: kr: tyayana, R. (Ed.) (1938-1940). Dharmakīrti's Pramān: avārttika with a commentary by Manorathanandin. Journal of the Bihar and Orissa Research Society, 24/3-26/3.
29. Schmithausen, L. (2005). On the problem of the external world in the Ch'eng wei shih lun. Studia Philological Buddhica Occasional Paper Series, XIII. Tokyo: The International Institute for Buddhist Studies.
30. Sellars, W. (1997). Empiricism and the philosophy of mind: With an introduction by Richard Rorty and a study guide by Robert Brandom. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
31. Shastri, S. D. (Ed.) (1968). Pramān: avārttika, Ācāryamanorathanandivr : ttiyutam. (Dharmakīrtinibandhā vali , vol. 1). Varanasi: Bauddha Bharati.
32. Steinkellner, E. (2005). Dignāga's Pramān: asamuccaya, Chapter 1: A hypothetical reconstruction of the Sanskrit text with the help of the two Tibetan translations on the basis of the hitherto known Sanskrit fragments and the linguistic materials gained from Jinendrabuddhi's T: īkā, downloaded from http://www.oeaw.ac.at/ias/Mat/dignaga-PS-1.pdf; (accessed June 2, 2005).
33. Steinkellner, E., Krasser, H., & Lasic, H. (Eds.) (2005). Jinendrabuddhi's ViŚālāmalavatī Pramān: - asamuccaya:tīkā : Chapter 1, Part I: Critical Edition. Beijing and Vienna: China Tibetology Publishing House, Austrian Academy of Sciences Press.
34. Taber, J. (2003). Dharmakīrti against physicalism. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 31, 479-502.
35. Tillemans, T. J. F. (2003). Metaphysics for Mādhyamikas. In G. Dreyfus, & S. McClintock (Eds.) The Svātantrika-Prāsan : gika distinction: What difference does a difference make? (pp. 93-123). Boston: Wisdom Publications.