Is Svasamvitti transcendental? A tentative reconstruction following Śǎntaraksita

Asian Philosophy

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 77-111

  Arnold, Dan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 61949368171     PISSN: 09552367     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0955236052000341050     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Apte, V. S. (1992), The practical Sanskrit-English dictionary. Kyoto: Rinsen.
2. Arnold, D. (2003). Candrakīrti on Dignāga on Svalaksanas. Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies, 26 (1), pp. 139-174.
3. Arnold, D. (in press) Buddhists, Brahmins, and belief. Epistemology in classical Indian philosophy of religion. New York: Columbia University Press.
4. Baker, L. R. (1987). Saving belief: A critique of physicalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
5. Blumenthal, J. (2004). The ornament of the Middle Way: A study of the Madhyamaka thought of Samntaraksita. Ithaca, NY: Snow Lion.
6. Brandom, R. (2000). Articulating reasons: An introduction to inferentialism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7. Brentano, F. (1973). Psychology from an empirical standpoint (O. Kraus, Ed.; A. C. Rancurello, D. B. Terrell, & L. L. McAlister, Trans.). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
8. Carl, W. (1994). Frege's theory of sense and reference: Its origins and scope. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Doctor, T. H. (Trans.). (2004). Speech of delight: Mipham's commentary on Śāntaraksita's Ornament of the Middle Way. Ithaca: Snow Lion.
10. Dreyfus, G. (1997). Recognizing reality: Dharmakīrti's philosophy and its Tibetan interpreters. Albany, NY: State University of New York.
11. Franco, E. (1997). Dharmakīrti on compassion and rebirth. Wiener Studien zur Tibetologie unci Buddhismuskunde (Vol. 38). Wien: Arbeitskreis für tibetische und buddhistische Studien, Universität Wien.
12. Frege, G. (1959). The foundations of arithmetic: A logico-mathematical enquiry into the concept of number (J. L. Austin, Trans.) (2nd rev. ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
13. Garfield, J. L. (2004). The conventional status of reflexive awareness: What's at stake in a Tibetan debate? Unpublished manuscript.
14. Goodman, C. (2004). Has Strawson refuted Dharmakīrti? Paper presented at the Eastern Division conference of the American Philosophical Association, December.
15. Hattori, M. (1968). Dignāga, on perception, being the Pratyaksapariccheda of Dignāga's Pramānasamuccaya from the Sanskrit fragments and the Tibetan versions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16. Hayes, R. P. (1988). Dignāga on the interpretation of signs. In Studies in Classical India (Vol. 9). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
17. Hayes, R. P. (1993). Dharmakīrti on rebirth. In E. Mayeda (Ed.), Studies in original Buddhism and Mahāyāna Buddhism in commemoration of late Professor Dr. Fumimaro Watanabe (pp.111-129). Kyoto: Nagata Bunshodo.
18. Hume, D. (1978), A treatise of human nature. L. A. Selby-Bigge (Ed., with an Analytical Index). (2nd ed., with text revised and variant readings by P. H. Nidditch). Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Original work published 1739.)
19. Huntington, C. W., with Wangchen, G. N. (1989). The emptiness of emptiness: An introduction to early Indian Mādhyamika. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
20. Husserl, E. (1995). Cartesian meditations: An introduction to phenomenology. D. Cairns (Trans.). Dordrecht: Kluwer. (Original work published 1950.)
21. Ichigō, Masamichi (Ed. & Trans.). (1989). Śāntaraksita's Madhyamakālamkāra. In L. Gómez & J. Silk (Eds.), Studies in the literature of the great vehicle: Three Mahāyāna Buddhist texts (pp. 141-240). Ann Arbor: Center for South and Southeast Asian Studies, The University of Michigan.
22. Kant, I. (1965). Critique of Pure Reason (N. Kemp Smith, Trans.) (unabridged ed.). New York: St. Martin's Press. [Original works ('A' and 'B') published 1781 and 1787 respectively.]
23. Kapstein, M. (2000). We are all Gzhan stong pas: Reflections on The Reflexive Nature of Awareness: A Tibetan Madhyamaka Defence, by Paul Williams. Journal of Buddhist Ethics, 7, 105-125 (http://jbe.gold.ac.uk/7/kapstein001.html).
24. Krasser, H. (1992). On the relationship between Dharmottara, Śāntaraksita and Kamalaśīla. In I. Shōren and Y. Zuihō (Eds.), Tibetan studies: Proceedings of the 5th Seminar of the International Association for Tibetan Studies, Narita 1989 (Vol. 1): Buddhist philosophy and literature (pp. 151-158). Narita: Naritasan Shinshoji.
25. La Vallée Poussin, L. de (Ed.) (1970a). Madhyamakāvatāra par Candrakīrti: Traduction tibétaine. Bibliotheca Buddhica (Vol. IX). Osnabrück: Biblio Verlag. (Reprint; originally St. Petersburg: Académic Impériale des Sciences, 1907-1912).
26. La Vallée Poussin, L. de (Ed.) (1970b). Mūlamadhyamakakārikās (Mādhyamikasūtras) de Nāgārjuna, avec la Prasannapadā Commentaire de Candrakīrti. Bibliotheca Buddhica (Vol. IV). Osnabrück: Biblio Verlag. (Reprint; originally St. Petersburg: Académie Impériale des Sciences, 1903-1913.)
27. Lévi, S. (Ed.) (1925). Vijñaptimātratāsiddhi: Deux traités de Vasubandhu: Vimśatikā (la vingtaine), accompagnée d'une explication en prose, et Trimśikā (la trentaine), avec le commentaire de Sthiramati. Paris: Librairie Ancienne Honoré Champion.
28. Locke, J. (1975). An essay concerning human understanding (Ed. with a foreword by P. H. Nidditch). Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Original work published 1689.)
29. McClintock, S. (2003). The role of the 'given' in the classification of Samntaraksita and Kamalaśila as Svātantrika-Mādhyamikas. In G. Dreyfus & S. McClintock (Eds.), The Svātantrika-Prāsangika distinction: What difference does a difference make?, (pp.125-171). Boston, MA: Wisdom.
30. McDowell, J. (1996). Mind and World (with a new introduction). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31. McDowell, J. (1998). Having the World in view: Sellars, Kant, and intentionality. Journal of Philosophy, 95 (9), 431-491.
32. Malvania, D. (Ed.) (1971). Pandita Durveka Miśra's Dharmottarapradīpa (Tibetan Sanskrit Works Series, Vol.11). (2nd ed.). Patna: Kashiprasad Jayaswal Research Institute.
33. Pippin, R. B. (1989). Hegel's idealism: The satisfactions of self consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34. Sellars, W. (1963). Science, Perception and Reality. Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview.
35. Shastri, S. D. (Ed.). (1997). Ācāryaśrisāntaraksita viracitah Tattvasamgraha, Kamalas'īlapañjikopapetah (2 Vols, continuous pagination). (2nd ed.). Varanasi: Bauddha Bharati.
36. Singh, B. N. (Ed.). (1985). Bauddha-Tarkabhā, sā of Moksākaragupta. Varanasi: Asha Prakashan.
37. Strawson, P. F. (1959). Individuals: An essay in descriptive metaphysics. London: Routledge.
38. Strawson, P. F. (1966). The bounds of sense: An essay on Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. London: Routledge.
39. Taber, J. (2003). Dharmakīrti against physicalism. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 31, 479-502.
40. Vaidya, P. L. (Ed.). (1988). Bodhicaryāvatāra of Śāntideva, with the Commentary Pañjikā of Prajñākaramati. Buddhist Sanskrit Texts, No. 12 (2nd ed.) (S. Tripathi, Ed.). Darbhanga: Mithila Institute.
41. Wayman, A. (1979). Yogācāra and the Buddhist logicians. Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies, 2(1), 65-78.
42. Williams, P. (1998). The reflexive nature of awareness: A Tibetan Madhyamaka defence. London: Curzon.