Phenological and histochemical changes of Ulmus minor due to root absorption of phenol: Implications for resistance to DED

Environmental and Experimental Botany

Volumn 69, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 175-182

  Martín, Juan A ^a   Solla, Alejandro ^b   Gil, Luis ^c   García Vallejo, María C ^a  

^a INIA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EXTREMADURA   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

Dutch elm disease; GC MS; Ophiostoma novo ulmi Brasier; Phenol; Ulmus minor Mill.

Indexed keywords

ABSORPTION; BIOACCUMULATION; BIODEGRADATION; DECIDUOUS TREE; DETOXIFICATION; DISEASE RESISTANCE; FUNGAL DISEASE; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; INHIBITION; PHENOL; PHENOLOGY; ROOT; SOIL TEXTURE; SPORULATION; SURVIVAL; XYLEM;

CORDIA ALLIODORA; OPHIOSTOMA; OPHIOSTOMA NOVO-ULMI; ULMUS; ULMUS MINOR;

EID: 77956874437     PISSN: 00988472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2010.04.001     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Biggs A.R. Suberized boundary zones and the chronology of wound response in tree bark. Phytopathology 1985, 75:1191-1195.
2. Brasier C., Buck K., Paoletti M., Crawford L., Kirk S. Molecular analysis of evolutionary changes in populations of Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. Invest. Agrar.: Sist. Recur. For. 2004, 13:93-103.
3. Brener W.D., Beckman C.H. A mechanism of enhanced resistance to Ceratocystis ulmi in American elms treated with sodium trichlorophenylacetate. Phytopathology 1968, 58:555-561.
4. 2 production in Ulmus pumila and Ulmus campestris cell suspension cultures inoculated with Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. Physiol. Plant 2001, 111:512-518.
5. Franke R., Schreiber L. Suberin-a biopolyester forming apoplastic plant interfaces. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2007, 10:252-259.
6. Ghanati F., Morita A., Yokota H. Deposition of suberin in roots of soybean induced by excess boron. Plant Sci. 2005, 168:397-405.
7. Gil L., Fuentes-Utrilla P., Soto A., Cervera M.T., Collada C. English elm (Ulmus procera) is a 2000-year-old Roman clone. Nature 2004, 431:1053.
8. Gupta P.K. Methods in Environmental Analysis: Water, Soil and Air 2000, Agrobios, India.
9. Herms D.M., Mattson W.J. The dilemma of plants: to grow or to defend. Quart. Rev. Biol. 1992, 67:283-335.
10. Heybroek H.M. Elm breeding in the Netherlands. Silvae Genet. 1957, 6:112-117.
11. Kais A., Smalley E.B., Riker A. Environment and development of Dutch elm disease. Phytopathology 1962, 52:1191-1196.
12. Korte F., Kvesitadze G., Ugrekhelidze D., Gordeziani M., Khatisashvili G., Buadze O., Zaalishvili G., Coulston F. Organic toxicants and plants. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2000, 47:1-26.
13. Llompart M., Blanco B., Cela R. Determination of phenols in soils by in situ acetylation headspace solid-phase microextraction. J. Microcolumn Sep. 2000, 12:25-32.
14. Martín J.A., Solla A., Woodward S., Gil L. FT-IR spectroscopy as a new method for evaluating host resistance in the Dutch elm disease complex. Tree Physiol. 2005, 25:1331-1338.
15. Martín J.A., Solla A., Coimbra S., Gil L. Metabolic distinction of Ulmus minor xylem tissues after inoculation with Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. Phytochemistry 2005, 66:2458-2467.
16. Martín J.A., Solla A., Burón M., López-Almansa J.C., Gil L. Caracterización histórica, ecológica, taxonómica y fitosanitaria de una olmeda relicta en Rivas-Vaciamadrid (Madrid). Invest. Agrar.: Sist. Recur. For. 2006, 15:208-217.
17. Martín J.A., Solla A., Woodward S., Gil L. Detection of differential changes in lignin composition of elm xylem tissues inoculated with Ophiostoma novo-ulmi using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. For. Pathol. 2007, 37:187-191.
18. Martín J.A., Solla A., Domingues M.R., Coimbra M.A., Gil L. Exogenous phenol increase resistance of Ulmus minor to Dutch elm disease through formation of suberin-like compounds on xylem tissues. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2008, 64:97-104.
19. Martín J.A., Solla A., Esteban L.G., de Palacios P., Gil L. Bordered pit and ray morphology involvement in elm resistance to Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. Can. J. For. Res. 2009, 39:420-429.
20. Ouellette G.B., Rioux D., Simard M., Cherif M. Ultrastructural and cytochemical studies of host and pathogens in some fungal wilt diseases: retro- and introspection towards a better understanding of DED. Invest. Agrar.: Sist. Recur. For. 2004, 13:119-145.
21. Reinhardt D.H., Rost T.L. Salinity accelerates endodermal development and induces an exodermis in cotton seedling roots. Environ. Exp. Bot. 1995, 35:563-574.
22. Rioux D., Ouellette G.B. Barrier zone formation in host and nonhost trees inoculated with Ophiostoma ulmi. I. Anatomy and histochemistry. Can. J. Bot. 1991, 69:2055-2073.
23. Santini A., Ghelardini L., Falusi M., Bohnens J., Buron M., Collin E., Solla A., Vanden Broeck A. Vegetative bud-burst variability of European elms. Invest. Agrar.: Sist. Recur. For. 2004, 13:37-45.
24. Seidel K., Kickuth R. The reaction of chloroperoxidase with chlorite and chlorine dioxide. J. Biol. Chem. 1965, 256:6034-6040.
25. Shigo A., Tippett J.T. Compartmentalization of American elm tissues infected by Ceratocystis ulmi. Plant Dis. 1981, 65:715-718.
26. Smalley E.B., Kais A.G. Seasonal variations in the resistance of various elm species to Dutch elm disease. Proceedings for Breeding Pest-Resistant Trees 1966, 279-287. Pergamon Press, Oxford. H.D. Gerhold, E.J. Schreiner, R.E. McDermott, J.A. Winieski (Eds.).
27. Solla A., Gil L. Influence of water stress on Dutch elm disease symptoms in Ulmus minor. Can. J. Bot. 2002, 80:810-817.
28. Solla A., Bohnens J., Collin E., Diamandis S., Franke A., Gil L., Burón M., Santini A., Mittempergher L., Pinon J., Vanden Broeck A. Screening European elms for resistance to Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. For. Sci. 2005, 51:134-141.
29. Solla A., Martín J.A., Corral P., Gil L. Seasonal changes in wood formation of Ulmus pumila and U. minor and its relation with Dutch elm disease. New Phytol. 2005, 166:1025-1034.
30. Solla A., Dacasa M.C., Nasmith C., Hubbes M., Gil L. Analysis of Spanish populations of Ophiostoma ulmi and O. novo-ulmi using phenotypic characteristics and RAPD markers. Plant Pathol. 2008, 57:33-44.
31. Sutherland M.L., Pearson S., Brasier C.M. The influence of temperature and light on defoliation levels of elm by Dutch elm disease. Phytopathology 1997, 87:576-581.
32. Tchernoff V. Methods for screening and for the rapid selection of elms for resistance to Dutch elm disease. Acta Bot. Neerl. 1965, 14:409-452.
33. Ucisik A.S., Trapp S. Uptake, removal, accumulation, and phytotoxicity of phenol in willow trees (Salix viminalis). Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2006, 25:2455-2460.
34. Ugrekhelidze D., Kvesitadze G., Arziani B., Mithaishvili T., Phiriashvili V. Detoxication of phenol in annual plant seedlings. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 1999, 42:119-124.
35. Verkleij J.A.C., Golan-Goldhirsh A., Antosiewisz D.M., Schwitzguébel J.P., Schröder P. Dualities in plant tolerance to pollutants and their uptake and translocation to the upper plant parts. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2009, 67:10-22.
36. Webber J.F. Insect vector behavior and the evolution of Dutch elm disease. The Elms: Breeding, Conservation and Disease Management 2000, 47-60. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston. C.P. Dunn (Ed.).
37. Witzell J., Gref R., Näsholm T. Phenolic compounds in vegetative tissues of bilberry (Vaccinium myrtillus L.). Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2003, 31:115-127.
38. Witzell J., Martín J.A. Phenolic metabolites in the resistance of northern forest trees to pathogens-past experiences and future prospects. Can. J. For. Res. 2008, 38:2711-2727.