Replication fork breakage and re-start: New insights into Rad3/XPD-associated deficiencies

Cell Cycle

Volumn 9, Issue 15, 2010, Pages 3030-3034

  Moriel Carretero, M ^a   Aguilera, A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SEVILLE   (Spain)

Author keywords

Cockayne syndrome; Double strand break repair; Homologous recombination; Nucleotide excision repair; Pol32; Rad3 XPD; Rad51; Replication fork breakage and re start; TFIIH; Xeroderma pigmentosum

Indexed keywords

CHECKPOINT KINASE RAD3; RAD51 PROTEIN; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR II; XERODERMA PIGMENTOSUM GROUP D PROTEIN;

ALLELE; COCKAYNE SYNDROME; DNA DAMAGE; DNA STRAND BREAKAGE; EXCISION REPAIR; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; HUMAN; MUTATIONAL ANALYSIS; NONHUMAN; REPLICATION FORK BREAKAGE; REVIEW; TRICHOTHIODYSTROPHY; XERODERMA PIGMENTOSUM;

EID: 77956864895     PISSN: 15384101     EISSN: 15514005     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/cc.9.15.12408     Document Type: Review

References (28)

1. Mocquet V, Laine JP, Riedl T, Yajin Z, Lee MY, Egly JM. Sequential recruitment of the repair factors during NER: the role of XPG in initiating the resynthesis step. EMBO J 2008; 27:155-67.
2. Golin JE, Esposito MS. Evidence for joint genic control of spontaneous mutation and genetic recombination during mitosis in Saccharomyces. Mol Gen Genet 1977; 150:127-35.
3. Malone RE, Hoekstra MF. Relationships between a hyper-rec mutation (REM1) and other recombination and repair genes in yeast. Genetics 1984; 107:33-48.
4. Montelone BA, Hoekstra MF, Malone RE. Spontaneous mitotic recombination in yeast: the hyper-recombinational rem1 mutations are alleles of the RAD3 gene. Genetics 1988; 119:289-301.
5. Hoekstra MF, Malone RE. Hyper-mutation caused by the rem1 mutation in yeast is not dependent on error-prone or excision repair. Mutat Res 1987; 178:201-10.
6. Navarro MS, Bi L, Bailis AM. A mutant allele of the transcription factor IIH helicase gene, RAD3, promotes loss of heterozygosity in response to a DNA replication defect in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 2007; 176:1391-402.
7. Moriel-Carretero M, Aguilera A. A postincision-deficient TFIIH causes replication fork breakage and uncovers alternative Rad51- or Pol32-mediated restart mechanisms. Mol Cell 37:690-701.
8. Pardo B, Gomez-Gonzalez B, Aguilera A. DNA repair in mammalian cells: DNA double-strand break repair: how to fix a broken relationship. Cell Mol Life Sci 2009; 66:1039-56.
9. Bai Y, Symington LS. A Rad52 homolog is required for RAD51-independent mitotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes & Dev 1996; 10:2025-37.
10. Dong Z, Fasullo M. Multiple recombination pathways for sister chromatid exchange in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: role of RAD1 and the RAD52 epistasis group genes. Nucl Acids Res 2003; 31:2576-85.
11. Lydeard JR, Jain S, Yamaguchi M, Haber JE. Break-induced replication and telomerase-independent telomere maintenance require Pol32. Nature 2007; 448:820-3.
12. Aguilera A. Double-strand break repair: are Rad51/RecA - DNA joints barriers to DNA replication? Trends Genet 2001; 17:318-21.
13. Kang LE, Symington LS. Aberrant double-strand break repair in rad51 mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 2000; 20:9162-72.
14. Rattray AJ, Symington LS. Use of a chromosomal inverted repeat to demonstrate that the RAD51 and RAD52 genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae have different roles in mitotic recombination. Genetics 1994; 138:587-95.
15. Malagon F, Aguilera A. Yeast spt6-140 mutation, affecting chromatin and transcription, preferentially increases recombination in which Rad51p-mediated strand exchange is dispensable. Genetics 2001; 158:597-611.
16. Smith CE, Llorente B, Symington LS. Template switching during break-induced replication. Nature 2007; 447:102-5.
17. Llorente B, Smith CE, Symington LS. Break-induced replication: what is it and what is it for? Cell Cycle 2008; 7:859-64.
18. Nouspikel T. DNA repair in mammalian cells: Nucleotide excision repair: variations on versatility. Cell Mol Life Sci 2009; 66:994-1009.
19. Venema J, Mullenders LH, Natarajan AT, van Zeeland AA, Mayne LV. The genetic defect in Cockayne syndrome is associated with a defect in repair of UV-induced DNA damage in transcriptionally active DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1990; 87:4707-11.
20. Svejstrup JQ. Mechanisms of transcription-coupled DNA repair. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2002; 3:21-9.
21. Rockx DA, Mason R, van Hoffen A, Barton MC, Citterio E, Bregman DB, et al. UV-induced inhibition of transcription involves repression of transcription initiation and phosphorylation of RNA polymerase II. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000; 97:10503-8.
22. Theron T, Fousteri MI, Volker M, Harries LW, Botta E, Stefanini M, et al. Transcription-associated breaks in xeroderma pigmentosum group D cells from patients with combined features of xeroderma pigmentosum and Cockayne syndrome. Mol Cell Biol 2005; 25:8368-78.
23. Winkler GS, Sugasawa K, Eker AP, de Laat WL, Hoeijmakers JH. Novel functional interactions between nucleotide excision DNA repair proteins influencing the enzymatic activities of TFIIH XPG and ERCC1-XPF. Biochemistry 2001; 40:160-5.
24. Fan L, Fuss JO, Cheng QJ, Arvai AS, Hammel M, Roberts VA, et al. XPD helicase structures and activities: insights into the cancer and aging phenotypes from XPD mutations. Cell 2008; 133:789-800.
25. Berneburg M, Lowe JE, Nardo T, Araujo S, Fousteri MI, Green MH, et al. UV damage causes uncontrolled DNA breakage in cells from patients with combined features of XP-D and Cockayne syndrome. EMBO J 2000; 19:1157-66.
26. Neecke H, Lucchini G, Longhese MP. Cell cycle progression in the presence of irreparable DNA damage is controlled by a Mec1- and Rad53-dependent checkpoint in budding yeast. EMBO J 1999; 18:4485-97.
27. Giannattasio M, Lazzaro F, Longhese MP, Plevani P, Muzi-Falconi M. Physical and functional interactions between nucleotide excision repair and DNA damage checkpoint. EMBO J 2004; 23:429-38.
28. Marini F, Nardo T, Giannattasio M, Minuzzo M, Stefanini M, Plevani P, et al. DNA nucleotide excision repair-dependent signaling to checkpoint activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006; 103:17325-30.