Still Cruising and Believing? An Analysis of Online Credibility Across Three Presidential Campaigns

American Behavioral Scientist

Volumn 54, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 57-77

  Johnson, Thomas J ^a   Kaye, Barbara K ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

credibility; Internet and elections; Internet credibility; Internet use

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956846387     PISSN: 00027642     EISSN: 15523381     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0002764210376311     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Abdulla, R.A., Garrison, B., Salwen, M.B., Driscoll, P.D., & Casey, D. (2005). Online news credibility. In M. B. Salwen., B. Garrison., & P. D. Driscoll (Eds.), Online news and the public (pp. 148-163). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2. Andrews, P. (2003). Is blogging journalism? Nieman Reports, 57, 63-64.
3. Arpan, L.M. & Raney, A.A. (2003). An experimental investigation of news source and the hostile media effect. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 80, 265-281.
4. Babbie, E. (1990). Survey research methods. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
5. Banning, S.A., & Sweetster, K.D. (2007). How much do they think it affects them and who do they believe? Comparing the third-person effect and credibility of blogs and traditional media. Communication Quarterly, 55, 451-466.
6. Banning, S., & Trammell, K.D. (2006, August). Revisiting the issue of blog credibility: A national survey. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Association for.
7. Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, San Francisco, CA.
8. Berlo, D.K., Lemert, J.B., & Mertz, R.J. (1969) Dimensions for evaluating the acceptability of message sources. Public Opinion Quarterly, 46, 563-76.
9. Brady, D.J. (1996, November). Cyberdemocracy and perceptions of politics: An experimental analysis of political communication on the World Wide Web. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Association for Public Opinion Research, Chicago, IL.
10. Brill, A.M. (2001). Online journalists embrace new marketing function. Newspaper Research Journal, 22, 28-40.
11. Bruns, A. (2006). The practice of news blogging. In A. Bruns & J. Jacobs (Eds.), Uses of blogs (pp. 11-22). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
12. Bucy, E.P. (2003). Media credibility reconsidered: Synergy effects between on-air and online news. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 80(2), 247-264.
13. Calabrese, A., & Borchert, M. (1996). Prospects for electronic democracy in the United States: Rethinking communication and social policy. Media, Culture and Society, 18, 249-268.
14. Carter, R.F., & Greenberg, B.S. (1965). Newspapers or television: Which do you believe? Journalism Quarterly, 42, 29-34.
15. Cassidy, W.P. (2007). Online news credibility: An examination of the perceptions of newspaper journalists. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 12, Article 7. Retrieved fromhttp://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol12/issue2.cassidy.html.
16. Center for the Digital Future. (2007). Online world as important to Internet users as real world? Retrieved fromhttp://www.digitalcenter.org/pdf/2007-Digital-Future-Report-Press-Release-112906.
17. Center for the Digital Future. (2008). Annual Internet survey by the Center for the Digital Future finds shifting trends among adults about the benefits and consequences of children going online. Retrieved fromhttp://www.digitalcenter.org.
18. Center for the Digital Future (2010). 2010 USC Annenberg Digital Future study finds strong negative reaction to paying for online services. Retrieved fromhttp://www.digitalcenter.org/pdf/2010_digital_future_final_release.pdf.
19. Choi, J.H., Watt, J.H., & Lynch, M. (2006). Perceptions of news credibility about the war in Iraq: Why war opponents perceived the Internet as the most credible medium. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(1), Article 11. Retrieved fromhttp://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol12/issue1.choi.html.
20. Consumer Reports WebWatch. (2005). Leap of faith: Using the Internet despite the dangers. Retrieved fromhttp://www.consumerwebwatch.org/dynamic/web-credibility-reports-princeton.cfm.
21. Finberg, H.I., & Stone, M.L. (2002). Digital journalism credibility study. Washington, DC: Online News Association.
22. Flanagin, A.J., & Metzger, M.J. (2000). Perceptions of Internet information credibility. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 77, 515-540.
23. Flanagin, A.J., & Metzger, M.J. (2001). Internet use in the contemporary media environment. Human Communication Research, 27, 153-181.
24. Flanagin, A.J., & Metzger, M.J. (2007a). Digital media and youth: Unparalleled opportunity and unprecedented responsibility. In M. J. Metzger & A. J. Flanagin (Eds.), Digital media, youth and credibility (pp. 5-27). Chicago, IL: MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Media and Learning.
25. Flanagin, A.J., & Metzger, M.J. (2007b). The role of site features, user attributes, and information verification behaviors on the perceived credibility of Web-based information. New Media and Society, 9, 319-342.
26. Gaziano, C. (1987). How credible is the credibility crisis? Journalism Quarterly, 65, 267-278, 375.
27. Gaziano, C., & McGrath, K. (1986). Measuring the concept of credibility. Journalism Quarterly, 63, 451-462.
28. GomdaWeb. (1998). Perceptions of reliability. Retrieved fromhttp://www.stanford.edu/class/comm217/reliability/perception.
29. Greenberg, B.S. (1966) Media use and believability: Some multiple correlates. Journalism Quarterly, 43, 665-670.
30. Greer, J., & Mensing, D. (2006). Early trends in online newspaper content. In X. Li (Ed.), Internet newspapers: The making of a mainstream medium (pp. 13-32). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
31. Gunther, A.C., & Liebhart, J.L. (2006) Broad reach or biased source? Decomposing the hostile media effect. Journal of Communication, 56, 449-466.
32. Gunther, A.C., & Schmitt, K. (2004). Mapping boundaries of the hostile media effect. Journal of Communication, 54, 55-70.
33. Hess, S. (1998). Credibility: Does it drive the bottom line? Retrieved fromhttp://www.naa.org/presstime/9807/cred.
34. Horrigan, J. (2006). Online news: For many home broadband users, the Internet is a primary news source. Retrieved fromhttp://www.pewinternet.org/reports.
35. Horrigan, J., Garrett, K., & Resnick, P. (2004). The Internet and democratic debate: Wired Americans hear more points of view about candidates and key issues than other citizens. Retrieved fromhttp://www.pewinternet.org/reports.
36. Hovland, C.I., Janis, I.L., & Kelley, H.H. (1953). Communication and persuasion. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
37. Johnson, T.J. & Kaye, B.K. (1998). Cruising is believing? Comparing Internet and traditional sources on media credibility measures. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 75, 325-340.
38. Johnson, T.J. & Kaye, B.K. (2000). Using is believing: The influence of reliance on the credibility of online political information among politically interested Internet users. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77, 865-879.
39. Johnson. T. J. & Kaye, B.K. (2002). Webelievability: A path model examining how convenience and reliance predict online credibility. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 79, 619-642.
40. Johnson, T.J. & Kaye, B.K. (2004). Wag the Blog: How reliance on traditional media and the Internet influence credibility perceptions of Weblogs among blog users. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 81, 622-642.
41. Johnson, T.J., Kaye, B.K., Bichard, S.L. & Wong, W.J. (2007). Every blog has its day: Politically-interested Internet users' perceptions of blog credibility. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), article 6. Retrieved fromhttp://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/johnson.html.
42. Jupiter Communications. (1998). 80 percent of consumers trust online news as much as offline. Retrieved fromhttp://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EIN/is_1998_Nov_19/ai_53237360.
43. Keller, J. (1998, Dec. 15).Truth be told, their mission is clearing Webs from Cyberspace. Retrieved fromhttp://articles.chicagotribune.com/1998-12-15/features/9812150031_1_worldwide-web-internet-web-ulman/2.
44. Kiousis, S. (2001). Public trust or mistrust? Perceptions of media credibility in the information age. Mass Communication and Society, 4, 381-403.
45. Mackay, J., & Lowrey, W. (2007, May). The credibility divide: Reader trust of online newspapers and blogs. Paper presented to the annual convention of the International Communication Association, San Francisco, CA.
46. McGrath, K. (1985). Newspaper credibility: Building reader trust. Minneapolis, MN: American Society of Newspaper Editors.
47. McLeod, J.M., Brown, J.D., & Becker, L.B. (1977). Watergate and the 1974 congressional elections. Public Opinion Quarterly, 41, 181-195.
48. Metzger, M.J., Flanagin, A., Eyal, K., Lemus D.R., & McCann R.M. (2003). Credibility for the 21st century: Integrating perspectives on source, message, and media credibility in the contemporize environment. Communication Yearbook, 27, 293-335.
49. Meyer, P. (1988). Defining and measuring credibility of newspapers: Developing an index. Journalism Quarterly, 65, 567-574.
50. Nadarajan, B., & Ang. P. (August, 1999). Credibility and journalism on the Internet: How online newspapers handle errors and corrections. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, New Orleans, LA.
51. Newhagen, J., & Nass, C. (1989). Differential criteria for evaluating credibility of newspapers and TV news. Journalism Quarterly, 66, 277-284.
52. Pew Research Center. (1999). The Internet news audience goes ordinary: Online newcomers more middle-brow, less work oriented. Retrieved fromhttp://www.people-press.org/reports.
53. Pew Research Center. (2000). Internet sapping broadcast news audience: Investors now go online for quotes, advice. Retrieved fromhttp://www.people-press.org/reports.
54. Pew Research Center. (2005). Public more critical of press, but goodwill persists: Online newspaper readership countering print losses. Retrieved fromhttp://www.people.press.org/reports.
55. Project for Excellence in Journalism. (2006). The state of the news media 2006. Retrieved fromhttp://www.journalism.org.
56. Project for Excellence in Journalism. (2007). The state of the news media 2007. Retrieved fromhttp://www.journalism.org.
57. Rainie, L., Cornfield, M., & Horrigan, J. (2005). The Internet and campaign 1994. Retrieved fromhttp://www.people.press.org/reports.
58. Rainie, L., & Horrigan, J. (2005). A decade of adoption: How the Internet has woven itself into American life. Retrieved fromhttp://www.pewinternet.org/reports.
59. Regan, T. (2003). Weblogs threaten and inform traditional journalism. Nieman Reports, 57, 68-70.
60. Schmitt, K.M., Gunther, A.C., & Liebhart, J.L. (2004). Why partisans see mass media as biased. Communication Research, 31, 623-441.
61. Schwartz, E. (1995). Looking for community on the Internet. National Civic Review, 84, 37-41.
62. Schweiger, W. (2000). Media credibility: Experience or image? A survey on the credibility of the World Wide Web in Germany in comparison to other media. European Journal of Communication, 15, 37-59.
63. Shenk, D. (1997). Data smog: Surviving the information glut. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
64. Smith, A. (2009).The Internet's role in campaign 2008. Retrieved fromhttp://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2009/6-The-Internets-Role-in-Campaign-2008.aspx.
65. Starobin, P. (1996). On the square. National Journal, 28, 1145-1149.
66. Stavrositu, C., & Sundar, S.S. (2006, June). If Internet credibility is so iffy, then why the heavy use? The relationship between medium use and credibility. Paper presented to the.
67. International Communication Association, Dresden, Germany.
68. Stepp, C.S. (2001, March). Signs of progress. New York: Ford Foundation.
69. Wall, M. (2006). Blogging Gulf War II. Journalism Studies, 7(1), 111-112.
70. Wanta, W., & Hu, Y. (1994) The effects of credibility, reliance, and exposure on media agenda-setting: A path analysis model. Journalism Quarterly, 71, 90-98.
71. Westley, B.H., & Severin, W.J. (1964). Some correlates of media credibility. Journalism Quarterly, 41, 325-335.
72. Whillock, R.K. (1997). Cyber-politics: The online strategies of '96. American Behavioral Scientist, 40, 1208-1225.
73. Witte, J., Amoroso, L., & Howard, P.E.N. (2000). Method and representation in Internet-based survey tools: Mobility, community, and cultural identity in Survey2000. Social Science Computer Review, 18(2), 179-195.
74. Witte, J., & Howard, P.E.N. (2002). The future of polling: Relational inference and the development of Internet survey instruments. In J. Manza, F. L. Cook, & B. Page (Eds.), Navigating public opinion: Polls, policy and the future of American democracy (pp. 272-289). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.