Multiscale modeling of hydrothermal pretreatment: From hemicellulose hydrolysis to biomass size optimization

Energy and Fuels

Volumn 24, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 4673-4680

  Hosseini, Seyed Ali ^a   Lambert, Romain ^a   Kucherenko, Sergei ^a   Shah, Nilay ^a  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BOND BREAKAGE; CHIP SIZES; DEGREE OF POLYMERIZATION; DETERMINANT FACTORS; ENERGY REQUIREMENTS; HEMICELLULOSE HYDROLYSIS; HYDROTHERMAL PRETREATMENT; MONOMERIC SUGARS; MULTI-SCALE MODELING; PHYSICAL ASPECTS; PHYSICAL NATURE; PRE-TREATMENT; PRETREATMENT PROCESS; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; PROCESS YIELD; RELATIVE IMPORTANCE; SIZE OPTIMIZATION; SIZE REDUCTIONS; SOLID PHASE REACTION; TAKE-ALL; WORK FOCUS; XYLO-OLIGOMER; XYLOOLIGOMERS;

BIOETHANOL; CELLULOSE; ETHANOL; FEEDSTOCKS; HYDROLYSIS; OPTIMIZATION; REACTION RATES; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SUGAR (SUCROSE);

PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS;

EID: 77956747458     PISSN: 08870624     EISSN: 15205029     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ef9012246     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (36)

1. FO Licht. World Ethanol and Biofuels Report 2006. FO Licht, Kent, U.K., 2006.
2. Wyman, C. E. Ethanol from lignocellulosic biomass: Technology, economics, and opportunities Bioresour. Technol. 1994, 50 (1) 3-15
3. Hamelinck, C. N.; Hooijdonk, G.; Faaij, A. P. C. Ethanol from lignocellulosic biomass: Techno-economic performance in short-, middle-and long-term Biomass Bioenergy 2005, 28 (4) 384-410
4. Farrell, A. E.; Plevin, R. J.; Turner, B. T.; Jones, A. D.; OHare, M.; Kammen, D. M. Ethanol can contribute to energy and environmental goals Science 2006, 311 (5760) 506-508
5. Hahn-Hägerdal, B.; Galbe, M.; Gorwa-Grauslund, M. F.; Liden, G.; Zacchi, G. Bio-ethanol-The fuel of tomorrow from the residues of today Trends Biotechnol. 2006, 24 (12) 549-556
6. Zaldivar, J.; Nielsen, J.; Olsson, L. Fuel ethanol production from lignocellulose: A challenge for metabolic engineering and process integration Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2001, 56 (1) 17-34
7. Galbe, M.; Zacchi, G. Simulation of processes for conversion of lignocellulosics. In Bioconversion of Forest and Agricultural Plant Residues; Saddler, J. N., Ed.; CABI: Oxfordshire, U.K., 1993; p 291.
8. McMillan, J. D. Bioethanol production: Status and prospects Renewable Energy 1997, 10 (2-3) 295-302
9. Weil, J.; Westgate, P.; Kohlmann, K.; Ladisch, M. R. Cellulose pretreatments of lignocellulosic substrates Enzyme Microb. Technol. 1994, 16 (11) 1002-1004
10. Mosier, N.; Wyman, C.; Dale, B.; Elander, R.; Lee, Y. Y.; Holtzapple, M.; Ladisch, M. Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass Bioresour. Technol. 2005, 96 (6) 673-686 (Pubitemid 39592889)
11. Aden; A.; Ruth, M.; Ibsen, K.; Jechura, J.; Neeves, K.; Sheehan, J.; Wallace, B.; Montague, L.; Slayton, A. Lignocellulosic biomass to ethanol process design and economics utilizing co-current dilute acid prehydrolysis and enzymatic hydrolysis for corn stover. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, 2002.
12. López, M. J.; Nichols, N. N.; Dien, B. S.; Moreno, J.; Bothast, R. J. Isolation of microorganisms for biological detoxification of lignocellulosic hydrolysates Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2004, 64 (1) 125-131
13. Palmqvist, E.; Hahn-Hägerdal, B. Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates. I: Inhibition and detoxification Bioresour. Technol. 2000, 74 (1) 17-24 (Pubitemid 30190274)
14. Gulati, M.; Kohlmann, K.; Ladisch, M. R.; Hespell, R.; Bothast, R. J.; Agricultural Research Service-United States Department of Agriculture (ARS-USDA). Assessment of ethanol production options for corn products. ARS-USDA, Washington, D.C., 1996.
15. Hosseini, S. A.; Shah, N. Multiscale modelling of biomass pretreatment for biofuels production Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2009, 87 (9) 1251-1260
16. Hosseini, S. A.; Shah, N. Multiscale modelling of biomass pretreatment for biofuels production Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2009, 87 (9) 1251-1260
17. Zhang, Y. H. P.; Lynd, L. R. Toward an aggregated understanding of enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose: Noncomplexed cellulase systems Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2004, 88 (7) 797-824
18. Sinnott, R. K.; Coulson, J. M.; Richardson, J. F. Coulson and Richardsons Chemical Engineering; Butterworth-Heinemann: Oxford, U.K., 2005.
19. Perry, R. H.; Green, D. W. Perrys Chemical Engineers Handbook; McGraw-Hill Professional: New York, 2007.
20. Mani, S.; Tabil, L. G.; Sokhansanj, S. Grinding performance and physical properties of wheat and barley straws, corn stover and switchgrass Biomass Bioenergy 2004, 27 (4) 339-352
21. Balat, M.; Balat, H.; Öz, C. Progress in bioethanol processing Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2008, 34 (5) 551-573
22. Garrote, G.; Dominguez, H.; Parajó, J. C. Mild autohydrolysis: An environmentally friendly technology for xylooligosaccharide production from wood J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 1999, 74 (11) 1101-1109
23. Simpson, W. T. Estimating heating times of wood boards, square timbers, and logs in saturated steam by multiple regression For. Prod. J. 2006, 56 (7/8) 26
24. Galbe, M.; Zacchi, G. A review of the production of ethanol from softwood Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2002, 59 (6) 618-628
25. 2 impregnation for production of bioethanol Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2005, 124 (1) 1101-1117
26. Jacobsen, S. E; Wyman, C. E. Cellulose and hemicellulose hydrolysis models for application to current and novel pretreatment processes Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2000, 84 (1) 81-96
27. Maloney, M. T.; Chapman, T. W.; Baker, A. J. Dilute acid hydrolysis of paper birch: Kinetics studies of xylan and acetyl-group hydrolysis Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1985, 27 (3) 355-361
28. Bhandari, N.; Macdonald, D. G.; Bakhshi, N. N. Kinetic studies of corn stover saccharification using sulphuric acid Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1984, 26 (4) 320-327
29. Saltelli, A.; Tarantola, S.; Campolongo, F.; Ratto, M.; Andres, T. Global Sensitivity Analysis; John Wiley and Sons: New York, 2008; ISBN: 0470059974.
30. Sobol, I. M.; Tarantola, S.; Gatelli, D.; Kucherenko, S.; Mauntz, W. Estimating the approximation error when fixing unessential factors in global sensitivity analysis Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2007, 92, 957-960
31. Sobol, I. M. Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates Math. Comput. Simul. 2001, 55, 271-280
32. Homma, T.; Saltelli, A. Importance measures in global sensitivity analysis of model output Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 1996, 52 (1) 1-17
33. Feil, B.; Kucherenko, S.; Shah, N. N. Comparison of Monte Carlo and quasi-Monte Carlo sampling methods in high dimensional model representation. The First International Conference on Advances in System Simulation, SIMUL 2009, Porto, Portugal, 2009.
34. Al?s, Ö. F.; Rabitz, H. Efficient implementation of high dimensional model representations J. Math. Chem. 2001, 29, 127-142
35. Li, G.; Hu, J.; Wang, S. W.; Georgopoulos, P. G.; Schoendorf, J.; Rabitz, H. Random sampling-high dimensional model representation (RS-HDMR) and orthogonality of its different order component functions J. Phys. Chem. 2006, 110, 2474-2485
36. Kucherenko, S.; Feil, B.; Shah, N.; Mauntz, W. The identification of model effective dimensions using global sensitivity analysis. J. Complexity 2009, manuscript submitted.