Calling behavior of Tetropium fuscum (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae: Spondylidinae)

Canadian Entomologist

Volumn 142, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 256-260

  Lemay, Matthew A ^a   Silk, Peter J ^a   Sweeney, Jon ^a  

^a LAURENTIAN FORESTRY CENTRE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEETLE; CALLING BEHAVIOR; CONSPECIFIC; GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY; INVASIVE SPECIES; MALE; MASS SPECTROMETRY; MATING BEHAVIOR; PHEROMONE; POSTURE; REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY; SUBSTRATE;

CERAMBYCIDAE; COLEOPTERA; PICEA; TETROPIUM FUSCUM;

EID: 77956717825     PISSN: 0008347X     EISSN: 19183240     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4039/n10-012     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Connor, W.E., and Best, B.A. 1988. Biomechanics of the release of sex pheromone in moths: effects of body posture on local airflow. Physiological Entomology, 13: 15-20. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3032. 1988.tb00904.x.
2. Crawshay, G.A. 1907. Life history of Tetropium gabrieli Weise. Transactions of the Entomological Society of London, 1907, Part II: 183-212.
3. Juutinen, P. 1955. Zur Biologie und forstlichen Bedeutung der Fichtenböcke (Tetropium Kirby) in Finnland. Acta Entomologica Fennica, 11: 1-112.
4. Lacey, E.S., Ray, A.M., and Hanks, L.M. 2007. Calling behaviour of the cerambycid beetle Neo-clytus acuminatus (F.). Journal ofInsect Behaviour, 20: 117-128. doi:10.1007/s10905-006-9068-6. (Pubitemid 46192609)
5. Lim, H., and Greenfield, M.D. 2007. Female pheromonal chorusing in an arctiid moth, Utetheisa ornatrix. Behavioural Ecology, 18: 165-173. doi:10.1093/beheco/arl069. (Pubitemid 46026327)
6. Lim, H., and Greenfield, M.D. 2008. Female arctiid moths, Utetheisa ornatrix, orient towards and join pheromonal choruses. Animal Behaviour, 75: 673-680. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.07.021.
7. Lim, H., Park, K.C., Baker, T.C., and Greenfield, M.D. 2007. Perception of conspecific female pheromone stimulates female calling in an arctiid moth, Utetheisa ornatrix. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 33: 1257-1271. PMID:17435986 doi:10. 1007/s10886-007-9291-4.
8. Schimitschek, E. 1929. Tetropium gabrieli Weise und Tetropium fuscum F.: ein Beitrag zu ihrer Lebensgeschichte und Lebensgemeinsamschaft. Zeitschrift für angewandte Entomologie, 5: 229-334.
9. Silk, P.J., Sweeney, J., Wu, J., Price, J., Gutowski, J.M., and Kettela, E.G. 2007. Evidence for a male-produced pheromone in Tetropium fuscum (F.) and Tetropium cinnamopterum (Kirby) (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Naturwissenschaf- ten, 94: 697-701. PMID:17429600 doi:10.1007/ s00114-007-0244-250
10. Smith, G., and Hurley, J.E. 2000. First North American record of the Palearctic species Tetro-pium fuscum (Fabricius) (Coleoptera: Ceramby-cidae). The Coleopterists Bulletin, 54: 540. doi:10.1649/0010-065X(2000)054[0540:FNAROT] 2.0.CO;2.
11. Sweeney, J., de Groot, P., Macdonald, L., Smith, S., Cocquempot, C., Kenis, M., and Gutowski, J.M. 2004. Host volatile attractants and traps for detection of Tetropium fuscum (F.), Tetropium castaneum L., and other longhorned beetles (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Environmental Entomology, 33: 844-854. doi:10.1603/0046-225X-33.4.844.
12. Sweeney, J., Gutowski, J.M., Price, J., and de Groot, P. 2006. Effect of semiochemical release rate, killing agent, and trap design on detection of Tetropium fuscum (F.) and other longhorn beetles (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Environmental Entomology, 35: 645-654. doi:10.1603/0046-225X-35.3.645.