Calling behavior of the cerambycid beetle Neoclytus acuminatus acuminatus (F.)

Journal of Insect Behavior

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 117-128

  Lacey, Emerson S ^a   Ray, Ann M ^a   Hanks, Lawrence M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

Longhorned beetle; Pheromone; Reproductive behavior; Semiochemical

Indexed keywords

CERAMBYCIDAE; COLEOPTERA; NEOCLYTUS ACUMINATUS;

EID: 33846671714     PISSN: 08927553     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10905-006-9068-6     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Connor, W. E., and Best, B. A. (1988). Biomechanics of the release of sex pheromone in moths: effects of body posture on local airflow. Physiol. Entomol. 13: 15-20.
2. Crawshay, G. A. (1907). The life history of Tetropium gabrieli. Trans. Entomol. Soc. London 13: 183-212.
3. Greenfield, M. D. (2002). Signalers and Receivers: Mechanisms and Evolution of Arthropod Communication, Oxford University Press, NY.
4. Hardie, J., and Minks, A. K. (eds.). (1999). Pheromones of Non-Lepidopterous Insects Associated with Agricultural Plants, CABI Publishing, Wallingford, United Kingdom.
5. Iwabuchi, K. (1986). Mating behavior of Xylotrechus pyrrhoderus Bates (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). III. pheromone secretion by male. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 21: 606-612.
6. Lacey, E. S., Ginzel,M. D., Millar, J. G., and Hanks, L.M. (2004). Male-produced aggregation pheromone of the cerambycid beetle Neoclytus acuminatus acuminatus. J. Chem. Ecol. 30: 1493-1507.
7. Leal, W. S., Yadava, C. P. S., and Vijayvergia, J. N. (1996). Aggregation of the scarab beetle Holotrichia consanguinea in response to female-released pheromone suggests a secondary function hypothesis for semiochemical. J. Chem. Ecol. 22: 1557-1566.
8. Linsley, E. G. (1964). The Cerambycidae of North America, Part V. Taxonomy and classification of the subfamily Cerambycinae, tribes Callichromini through Ancylocerini. Univ. Calif. Publ. Entomol. 22: 1-197.
9. Millar, J. G., and Haynes, K. F. (1998). Methods in Chemical Ecology: Volume 1, Kluwer, NY.
10. Moore, P., and Crimaldi, J. (2004). Odor landscapes and animal behavior: Tracking odor plumes in different physical worlds. J. Marine Systems 49: 55-64.
11. Nakamuta, K., Sato, H., and Nakashima, T. (1994). Behavioral andmorphological evidence for a male-produced sex pheromone in the cryptomeria twig borer, Anaglyptus subfasciatus Pic (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Jpn. J. Entomol. 62: 371-376.
12. Noldt, U., Fettköther, R., and Dettner, K. (1995). Structure of the sex pheromone-producing prothoracic glands of the male old house borer, Hylotrupes bajulus (L.) (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Intl. J. Insect Morphol. Embryol. 24: 223-234.
13. Quennedey, A. (1998). Insect epidermal gland cells: Ultrastructure and morphogenesis. In Harrison, F. W., and Ruppert, E. E. (eds.), Microscopic Anatomy of Invertebrates Vol. 11A: Insecta, Wiley-Liss, NY, pp. 177-207.
14. Ray, A. M., Lacey, E. S., andHanks, L.M. (2006). Predicted taxonomic patterns in pheromone production by cerambycid beetles. Naturwissenschaften 93: 543-550.
15. SAS Institute. (2001). SAS/STAT User's Guide for Personal Computers, Release 8.01, SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
16. Solomon, J. D. (1995). Guide to insect borers in North American broadleaf trees and shrubs. USDA For. Serv. Agric. Handbook AH-706: 747.
17. Souza Mendes, P. R. (1991). The naphthalene sublimation technique. Experimental Thermal Fluid Sci. 4: 510-523.