The next generation library catalog: A comparative study of the OPACs of Koha, Evergreen, and Voyager

Information Technology and Libraries

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 141-150

  Yang, Sharon Q ^a   Hofmann, Melissa A ^a  

^a RIDER UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956713460     PISSN: 07309295     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.6017/ital.v29i3.3139     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Tanja Mercun and Maja Žurner, "New Generation of Catalogues for the New Generation of Users: A Comparison of Six Library Catalogues, " Program: Electronic Library & Information Systems 42, no. 3 (July 2008):243-61.
2. Eric Lease Morgan, "A 'Next-Generation' Library Catalog-Executive Summary (Part of 5), " online posting, July 7, 2006, LITA Blog: Library Information Technology Association, http://litablog.org/2006/07/07/a-next- generation-library-catalog-executive-summary-part-l-of-5/(accessed Nov. 10, 2008).
3. Marshall Breeding, introduction to "Next Generation Library Catalogs, " Library Technology Reports 43, no. 4 (July/Aug. 2007):5-14.
4. Marshall Breeding, introduction to "Next Generation Library Catalogs, " Library Technology Reports 43, no. 4 (July/Aug. 2007):5-14.
5. Marshall Breeding, "Library Technology Guides: Key Resources in the Field of Library Automation, " http://www.librarytechnology.org/lwc-search- advanced.pl (accessed Jan. 23, 2010).
6. Marshall Breeding, "Investing in The Future: Automation Marketplace 2009, " Library Journal (Apr. 1, 2009), http://www.libraryjournal.com/ article/CA6645868.html (accessed Jan. 23, 2010).
7. Marshall Breeding, "Library Technology Guides: Company Directory, " http://www.librarytechnology.org/exlibris.pl?SID= 20100123734344482&code=vend (accessed Jan. 23, 2010).
8. Merčun and Zumer, "New Generation of Catalogues"
9. Merčun and Zumer, "New Generation of Catalogues."
10. Linda Riewe, "Integrated Library System (ILS) Survey: Open Source vs. Proprietary-Tables" (master's thesis, San Jose University, 2008):2-5, http://users.sfo.com/~lmr/ils-survey/tables-allpdf (accessed Nov. 4, 2008).
11. Linda Riewe, "Integrated Library System (ILS) Survey: Open Source vs. Proprietary-Tables" (master's thesis, San Jose University, 2008):2-5, http://users.sfo.com/~lmr/ils-survey/tables-allpdf (accessed Nov. 4, 2008). 26-27.
12. Breeding, introduction.
13. Morgan, "A 'Next-Generation' Library Catalog."
14. Breeding, introduction.
15. Breeding, introduction.
16. Breeding, introduction.
17. Villanova University, "VuFind, " http://vufind.org/(accessed June 10, 2010);
18. Innovated Interfaces, "Encore, " http://encoreforlibraries.com/ (accessed June 10, 2010).
19. Auto-Graphics, "AGent Illuminar, " http://www4.auto-graphics. com/solutions/agentiluminar/agentiluminar.htm (accessed June 10, 2010).
20. Breeding, introduction; Morgan, "A 'Next-Generation' Library Catalog."
21. Index Data, "Zebra, " http://www.indexdata.dk/zebra/(accessed Jan. 3, 2009).
22. Evergreen Docuwiki, "Search Relevancy Ranking, " http://open-ils.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=scratchpad:opac-demo&s=core (accessed Dec. 19, 2008).
23. Villahova University, "VuFind"; Oregon State University, "LibraryFind, " http://libraryfind.org/(accessed June 10, 2010).
24. Sharon Q. Yang and Kurt Wagner, "Open Source Stand-Alone OPACs, " (Microsoft PowerPoint presentation, 2010 Virtual Academic Library Environment Annual Conference, Piscataway, New Jersey, Jan. 8, 2010).