The angio-seal evolution registry: Outcomes of a novel automated angio-seal vascular closure device

Journal of Invasive Cardiology

Volumn 22, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 420-426

  Applegate, Robert J ^a   Turi, Zoltan ^b   Sachdev, Naveen ^c   Ahmed, Abdel ^d   Szyniszewski, Arthur ^e   Foster, Malcolm ^f   Pratsos, Antonis ^f   Shapiro, Timothy ^g   Yakubov, Steven ^h   Shavelle, David ⁱ  

^a WAKE FOREST SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Department of Anesthesiology   (United States)

^c PROVIDENCE ST VINCENT MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d ALTRU HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

^e ST JOSEPH MERCY HOSPITAL   (United States)

^f Baptist Hospital West   (United States)

^g LANKENAU HOSPITAL   (United States)

^h MidOhio Cardiology and Vascular Consultants   (United States)

ⁱ IGood Samaritan Hospital   (United States)

Author keywords

cardiac catheterization; percutaneous coronary intervention; propensity analysis; vascular complications

Indexed keywords

ACETYLSALICYLIC ACID; ANTITHROMBOCYTIC AGENT; CLOPIDOGREL; COLLAGEN SPONGE; COPOLYMER; FIBRINOGEN RECEPTOR ANTAGONIST; HEMOSTATIC AGENT; HEPARIN; HIRULOG;

ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME; ADULT; AGED; ANTICOAGULATION; ARTERIOTOMY; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; BLEEDING; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; BLOOD VESSEL INJURY; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL TRIAL; DRUG ELUTING STENT; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; FEMORAL ARTERY; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HEMOSTASIS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SAFETY; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; REGISTER; RETROPERITONEAL HEMORRHAGE; STABLE ANGINA PECTORIS; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; THERAPY EFFECT; THORAX PAIN; TRANSIENT ISCHEMIC ATTACK; VASCULAR ACCESS; VASCULAR ACCESS DEVICE; VASCULAR CLOSURE DEVICE;

AGED; ANGIOPLASTY, BALLOON, CORONARY; CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; FEMORAL ARTERY; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HEMORRHAGE; HEMOSTATIC TECHNIQUES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDIES AS TOPIC; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; REGISTRIES; RISK FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 77956673591     PISSN: 10423931     EISSN: 15572501     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Dauerman HL, Applegate RJ, Cohen DJ. Vascular closure devices: The second decade. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50:1617-1626.
2. Applegate RJ, Sacrinty M, Kutcher MA, et al. Propensity score analysis of vascular complications after diagnostic cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention 1998-2003. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2006;67:556-562.
3. Arora N, Matheny ME, Sepke C, Resnic FS. A propensity analysis of the risk of vascular complications after cardiac catheterization procedures with the use of vascular closure devices. Am Heart J 2007;153:606-611.
4. Balzer JO, Scheinert D, Diebold T, et al. Postinterventional transcutaneous suture of femoral artery access sites in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease: A study of 930 patients. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2001;53:174-181.
5. Warren BS, Warren SG, Miller SD. Predictors of complications and learning curve using the Angio-Seal closure device following interventional and diagnostic catheterization. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 1999;48:162-166.
6. Applegate RJ, Sacrinty MT, Kutcher MA, et al. Trends in vascular complications after diagnostic cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention via the femoral artery, 1998-2007. JACC Interv 2008;1:317-326.
7. Kussmaul WGI, Buchbinder M, Whitlow PL, et al. Rapid arterial hemostasis and decreased access site complications after cardiac catheterization and angioplasty: Results of a randomized trial of a novel hemostatic device. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;25:1685-1692.
8. Koreny M, Riedmuller E, Nikfardjam M, et al. Arterial puncture closing devices compared with standard manual compression after cardiac catheterization: Systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2004;291:350-357. (Pubitemid 38101608)
9. Nikolsky E, Mehran R, Halkin A, et al. Vascular complications associated with arteriotomy closure devices in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary procedures: A meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:1200-1209.
10. Vaitkus PT. A meta-analysis of percutaneous vascular closure devices after diagnostic catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention. J Invasive Cardiol 2004;16:243-246.
11. Applegate RJ, Grabarczyk MA, Little WC, et al. Vascular closure devices in patients treated with anticoagulation and IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors during percutaneous revascularization. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;40:78-83.
12. Assali AR, Sdringola S, Moustapha A, et al. Outcome of access site in patients treated with platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in the era of closure devices. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2003;58:1-5.
13. Resnic FS, Blake GJ, Ohno-Machado L, et al. Vascular closure devices and the risk of vascular complications after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients receiving glycoprotein IIb-IIIa inhibitors. Am J Cardiol 2001;88:493-496.
14. Tavris D, Gross T, Gallauresi B, Kessler L. Arteriotomy closure devices -The FDA perspective (editorial). J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;38:642-644.
15. Doyle BJ, Ting HH, Bell MR, et al. Major femoral bleeding complications after percutaneous coronary intervention: Incidence, predictors, and impact on longterm survival among 17,901 patients treated at the Mayo Clinic from 1994 to 2005. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2008;1:202-209.
16. Hermiller JB, Simonton C, Hinohara T, et al. The StarClose vascular closure system: Interventional results from the CLIP study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2006;68:677-683.
17. Scheinert D, Sievert H, Turco MA, et al. The safety and efficacy of an extravascular, water-soluable sealant for vascular closure: Initial clinical results for Mynx. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2007;70:627-633.
18. Baim DS, Knopf WD, Hinohara T, et al. Suture-mediated closure of the femoral access site after cardiac catheterization: Results of the suture to ambulate aNd discharge (STAND I and STAND II) trials. Am J Cardiol 2000;85:864-869.
19. Rao SV, O'Grady K, Pieper KS, et al. A comparison of the clinical impact of bleeding measured by two different classifications among patients with acute coronary syndromes. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:809-816.
20. Eikelboom JW, Mehta SR, Anand SS, et al. Adverse impact of bleeding on prognosis in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Circulation 2006;114:774-782.
21. Rao SV, Ou FS, Wang TY et al. Trends in the prevalence and outcomes of radial and femoral approaches to percutaneous coronary intervention: A report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2008;1:379-386.
22. Hamon M, Rasmussen LH, Manoukian SV, et al. Choice of arterial access site and outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes managed with an early invasive strategy: The ACUITY trial. EuroInterv 2009;5:115-120.
23. Jolly SS, Amlani S, Hamon M, et al. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography or intervention and the impact on major bleeding and ischemic events: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Am Heart J 2009;157:132-140.
24. Agostoni P, Biondi-Zoccai GGL, De Benedictis L, et al. Radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures: Systematic overview and meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44;349-356