SIFT and shape information incorporated into fluid model for non-rigid registration of ultrasound images

Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine

Volumn 100, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 123-131

  Lu, Xuesong ^a,b   Zhang, Su ^b   Yang, Wei ^b,c   Chen, Yazhu ^b  

^a SOUTH CENTRAL UNIVERSITY FOR NATIONALITIES   (China)

^b SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c SOUTHERN MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Fluid model; Non rigid registration; Scale invariant feature transform (SIFT); Shape information; Ultrasound images

Indexed keywords

FLUID MODELS; NON-RIGID REGISTRATION; SCALE INVARIANT FEATURE TRANSFORM (SIFT); SHAPE INFORMATION; ULTRASOUND IMAGES;

FLUIDS; PLASMA FLOW; ULTRASONIC TRANSMISSION; ULTRASONICS;

RIGID STRUCTURES;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BAYESIAN LEARNING; BREAST; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FORCE; GEOMETRY; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE DISPLAY; KIDNEY; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; ULTRASOUND;

ALGORITHMS; BAYES THEOREM; FEMALE; HUMANS; KIDNEY; MODELS, THEORETICAL; ULTRASONOGRAPHY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY;

EID: 77956649481     PISSN: 01692607     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2010.03.005     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Roche A., Pennec X., Malandain G., Ayache N. Rigid registration of 3D ultrasound with MR images: a new approach combing intensity and gradient information. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 2001, 20(10):1038-1049.
2. Berg J., Kruecker J., Schulz H., Meetz K., Sabczynski J. A hybrid method for registration of interventional CT and ultrasound images. Int. Congr. Ser. 2004, 1268:492-497.
3. Blackall M., Penney P., King P., Hawkes J. Alignment of sparse freehand 3D ultrasound with preoperative images of the liver using models of respiratory motion and deformation. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 2005, 24(11):1405-1416.
4. Shekhar R., Zagrodsky V. Mutual information-based rigid and nonrigid registration of ultrasound volumes. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 2002, 21(1):9-22.
5. Guofang X., Brady M., Noble A., Burcher M., English R. Nonrigid registration of 3D free-hand ultrasound images of the breast. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 2002, 21(4):405-412.
6. Krucker J.F., LeCarpentier G.L., Fowlkes J.B., Carson P.L. Rapid elastic image registration for 3D ultrasound. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 2002, 21(11):1384-1394.
7. Zitova B., Flusser J. Image registration methods: a survey. Image Vision Comput. 2003, 21(11):977-1000.
8. Rueckert D., Sonoda L.I., Hayes C., Hill D.L.G., Leach M.O., Hawkes D.J. Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 1999, 18(8):712-721.
9. Jianzhe W., Tianzi J. Nonrigid registration of brain MRI using NURBS. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 2007, 28:214-223.
10. D'Agostino E., Maes F., Vandermeulen D., Suetens P. A viscous fluid model for multimodality non-rigid image registration using mutual information. Med. Image Anal. 2003, 7:565-575.
11. Dinggang S., Davatzikos C. HAMMER: hierarchical attribute matching mechanism for elastic registration. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 2002, 21(11):1421-1439.
12. Foroughi P., Abolmaesumi P., Hashtrudi-Zaad K. Intra-subject elastic registration of 3D ultrasound images. Med. Image Anal. 2006, 10:713-725.
13. Urschler M., Bauer J., Ditt H., Bischof H. SIFT and shape context for feature-based nonlinear registration of thoracic CT images. Proceedings of the 2nd International ECCV Workshop, CVAMIA 2006, 73-84.
14. Yongmei W., Staib L.H. Physical model-based non-rigid registration incorporating statistical shape information. Med. Image Anal. 2000, 4:7-20.
15. Hartkens T., Hill D.L.G., Castellano-Smith A.D., Hawkes D.J., Maurer C.R., Martin A.J., Hall W.A., Liu H., Truwit C.L. Using points and surfaces to improve voxel-based non-rigid registration, MICCAI. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 2002, 2489:565-572.
16. Vese L.A., Osher S.J. Image denoising and decomposition with total variation minimization and oscillatory functions. J. Math. Imag. Vision 2004, 20:7-18.
17. Su Z., Wei Y., Hongtao L., Yazhu C., Wenying L., Yaqing C. Automatic feature extraction and analysis on breast ultrasound images, ICIC 2007. CCIS 2007, 2:957-963.
18. Chetverikov D. A simple and efficient algorithm for detection of high curvature points in planar curves, CAIP. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 2003, 2756:746-753.
19. Wenjing Z., Xiaoming X., Guojun D., Yupu Y. Approach to extract feature points on boundary based on curvature. J. Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ. 1999, 33(5):592-595.
20. Song W., Kubota T., Richardson T. Shape correspondence through landmark sliding. Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, vol. 1 2004, 143-150.
21. Bookstein F.L. Thin-plate splines and the decomposition of deformations. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1999, 11(6):567-585.
22. Lowe D.G. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. Int. J. Comput. Vision 2004, 60(2):91-100.
23. Mikolajczyk K., Schmid C. Performance evaluation of local descriptors. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2005, 27(10):1615-1630.
24. Bajcsy R., Kovacic S. Multiresolution elastic matching. Comput. Vision Graph. Image Process. 1989, 46:1-21.
25. Christensen G.E., Rabbitt R.D., Miller M.I. Deformable templates using large deformation kinematics. IEEE Trans. Imag. Proc. 1996, 5(10):1435-1447.
26. Bro-Nielsen M., Gramkow C. Fast fluid registration of medical images. Visual. Biomed. Comput. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 1996, 1131:267-276.
27. G.E. Christensen, Deformable shape models for anatomy, Ph.D. Thesis, Washington University, 1994.
28. http://www.cs.ubc.ca/~lowe/keypoints/.