Physical model-based non-rigid registration incorporating statistical shape information

Medical Image Analysis

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 7-20

  Wang, Yongmei ^a,b,c   Staib, Lawrence H ^a,c  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c Yale University   (United States)

Author keywords

Bayesian formulation; Deformable atlases; Non rigid registration; Physical models; Statistical shape models

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; BRAIN; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELASTICITY; HEART; HISTOLOGY; IMAGE PROCESSING; STATISTICAL MODEL; VISCOSITY;

BRAIN; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELASTICITY; HEART; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MODELS, ANATOMIC; MODELS, STATISTICAL; VISCOSITY;

EID: 0034151869     PISSN: 13618415     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1361-8415(00)00004-9     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Amit, Y., Grenander, U., Piccioni, M., 1991. Structural image restoration through defomable templates. J. Am. Statistical Assoc. 86 (414), 376-387.
2. Bajcsy, R., Kovačič, S., 1989. Multiresolution elastic matching. Comput. Vis. Graphics Image Processing 46, 1-21.
3. Bookstein, F.L., 1996. Shape and information in medical images: A decade of the morphometric synthesis. In: Proc. Workshop Math. Meth. Biomed. Image Anal., San Francisco, CA, pp. 2-12.
4. Canny, J.F., 1986. A computational approach to edge-detection. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intell. 8 (6), 679-698.
5. Christensen, G.E., 1994. Deformable shape models for anatomy. Doctoral dissertation in Electrical Engineering, Washington University, St. Louis.
6. Christensen, G.E., Miller, M.I., Vannier, M.W., 1996a. Individualizing neuroanatomical atlases using a massively parallel computer. Computer 29 (1), 32-38.
7. Christensen, G.E., Rabbitt, R.D., Miller, M.I., 1996b. Deformable templates using large deformation kinematics. IEEE Trans. Image Processing 5 (10), 1435-1447.
8. Collins, D.L., Evans, A.C., Holmes, C., Peters, T.M., 1995. Automatic 3D segmentation of neuro-anatomical structures from MRI. In: Information Processing Med. Imaging. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 139-152.
9. Cootes, T.F., Taylor, C.J., Cooper, D.H., Graham, J., 1995. Active shape models-their training and application. Comput.Vis. Image Understanding 61 (1), 38-59.
10. Davatzikos, C. and Prince, J. (1994) Brain image registration based on curve mapping. In: IEEE Workshop Biomedical Image Anal., Seattle, WA, pp. 245-254.
11. Fleute, M., Lavallée, S., 1998. Building a complete surface model from sparse data using statistical shape models: application to computer assisted knee surgery. In: First International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, Cambridge, MA, pp. 879-887.
12. Gee, J., Briquer, L.L., Barillot C., Haynor, D., 1995. Probabilistic matching of brain images. In: Information Processing in Medical Imaging. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 113-125.
13. González Ballester, M.Á., Zisserman, A., Brady, M., 1998. Measurement of brain structure based on statistical and geometrical 3D segmentation. In: First International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, Cambridge, MA, pp. 499-508.
14. Jain, A.K., Zhong, Y., Lakshmanan, S., 1996. Object matching using deformable templates. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell. 18 (3), 267-278.
15. Johnson, R.A., Wichern, D.W., 1988. Multivariate Statistics, A Practical Approach, Chapman & Hall, London.
16. Jolliffe, I.T., 1986. Principal Component Analysis, Springer, New York.
17. Malvern, L.E., 1969. Introduction to the Mechanics of a Continuous Medium, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
18. Miller, M.I., Christensen, G.E., Amit, Y., Grenander, U., 1993. Mathematical textbook of deformable neuroanatomies. In: Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, Vol. 90, pp. 11944-11948.
19. Montagnat, J., Delingette, H., 1998. Globally constrained deformable models for 3D object reconstruction. Signal Processing 71 (2), 173-186.
20. Rabbitt, R.D., Weiss, J.A., Christensen, G.E., Miller, M.I., 1995. Mapping of hyperelastic deformable templates using finite element method. Vision Geometry IV, SPIE 2573, 252-265.
21. Reddy, J.N., 1984. Energy and Variational Methods in Applied Mechanics, Wiley-Interscience, New York.
22. Staib, L.H., Duncan, J.S., 1992. Boundary finding with parametrically deformable models. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell. 14 (11), 1061-1075.
23. Székely, G., Keleman, A., Brechbuler, C., Gerig, G., 1996. Segmentation of 2-D and 3-D objects from MRI volume data using constrained elastic deformations of flexible Fourier contours and surface models. Medical Image Analysis 1 (1), 19-34.
24. Thirion, J.P., 1998. Image matching as a diffusion process: an analogy with Maxwell's demons. Medical Image Analysis 2 (3), 243-260.
25. Wang, Y., Staib, L.H., 1998a. Boundary finding with correspondence using statistical shape models. In: Proc. Conf. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Santa Barbara, CA, pp. 338-345.
26. Wang, Y., Staib, L.H., 1998b. Elastic model based non-rigid registration incorporating statistical shape information. In: First Int. Conf. on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, Cambridge, MA, pp. 1162-1173.
27. Wang, Y., Staib, L.H., 1998c. Integrated approaches to non-rigid registration in medical images. In: Fourth IEEE Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision, Princeton, NJ, pp. 102-108.
28. Wang, Y., 1999. Statistical shape analysis for image segmentation and physical model-based non-rigid registration. Doctoral dissertation in Electrical Engineering, Yale University.