Hox genes and the body plans of chelicerates and pycnogonids

Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology

Volumn 689, Issue , 2010, Pages 125-132

  Damen, Wim G M ^a  

^a FRIEDRICH SCHILLER UNIVERSITY JENA   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL ANATOMY; ANTERIOR POSTERIOR AXIS; ARTHROPOD; ARTICLE; CHELICERATE; EMBRYO PATTERN FORMATION; GENE CLUSTER; GENE DUPLICATION; HOX GENE; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MORPHOGENESIS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PYCNOGONID; STRUCTURAL HOMOLOGY; ANIMAL; CLASSIFICATION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; HISTOLOGY; HOMEOBOX; METABOLISM; PHYLOGENY;

ARTHROPODA; CHELICERATA; METAZOA; PYCNOGONIDA;

HOMEODOMAIN PROTEIN;

ANIMALS; ARTHROPODS; BODY PATTERNING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, DEVELOPMENTAL; GENES, HOMEOBOX; HOMEODOMAIN PROTEINS; PHYLOGENY;

EID: 77956634883     PISSN: 00652598     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-6673-5_9     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Westheide W, Rieger R. Spezielle Zoologie Teil 1: Einzeller und Wirbellose Tiere, 1st ed. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer Verlag, 1996.
2. Friedrich M, Tautz D. Ribosomal DNA phylogeny of the major extant arthropod classes and the evolution of myriapods. Nature 1995; 376:165-167.
3. Bitsch J, Bitsch C. The segmental organization of the head region in Chelicerata: a critical review of recent studies and hypotheses. Acta Zoologica (Stockholm) 2007; 88:317-335. (Pubitemid 47480810)
4. Scholtz G, Edgecombe GD. The evolution of arthropod heads: reconciling morphological, developmental and palaeontological evidence. Dev Genes Evol 2006; 216:395-415. (Pubitemid 44057484)
5. Cartwright P, Dick M, Buss LW. HOM/Hox type homeoboxes in the chelicerate Limulus polyphemus. Mol Phyl Evol 1993; 2:185-192.
6. Telford MJ, Thomas RH. Expression of homeobox genes shows chelicerate arthropods retain their deuterocerebral segment. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998; 95:10671-10675. (Pubitemid 28413126)
7. Telford MJ, Thomas RH. Of mites and zen: expression studies in a chelicerate arthropod confirm zen is a divergent Hox gene. Dev Genes Evol 1998; 208:591-594. (Pubitemid 28542703)
8. Telford MJ. Evidence for the derivation of the Drosophila fushi tarazu gene from a Hox gene orthologous to lophotrochozoan Lox5. Curr Biol 2000; 10:349-253.
9. Damen WGM, Hausdorf M, Seyfarth E-A et al. A conserved mode of head segmentation in arthropods revealed by the expression pattern of Hox genes in a spider. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998; 95:10665-10670. (Pubitemid 28413125)
10. Abzhanov A, Popadic A, Kaufman TC. Chelicerate Hox genes and the homology of arthropod segments. Evol Dev 1999; 1:77-89. (Pubitemid 129692234)
11. Damen WGM, Tautz D. A HOX class 3 orthologue from the spider Cupiennius salei is expressed in a Hox-gene-like fashion. Dev Genes Evol 1998; 208:586-590. (Pubitemid 28542702)
12. Damen WGM, Janssen R, Prpic N-M. Pair rule gene orthologs in spider segmentation. Evol Dev 2005; 7:618-628. (Pubitemid 41711658)
13. Schwager EE, Schoppmeier M, Pechmann M et al. Duplicated Hox genes in the spider Cupiennius salei. Front Zool 2007; 4:10.
14. Manuel M, Jager M, Murienne J et al. Hox genes in sea spiders (Pycnogonida) and the homology of arthropod head segments. Dev Genes Evol 2006; 216:481-491. (Pubitemid 44057490)
15. Jager M, Murienne J, Clabaut C et al. Homology of arthropod anterior appendages revealed by Hox gene expression in a sea spider. Nature 2006; 441:506-508. (Pubitemid 44050151)
16. Hughes CL, Kaufman TC. Hox genes and the evolution of the arthropod body plan. Evol Dev 2002; 4:459-499. (Pubitemid 35442214)
17. Hughes CL, Kaufman TC. Exploring the myriapod body plan: expression patterns of the ten Hox genes in a centipede. Development 2002; 19:1225-1238. (Pubitemid 34874145)
18. Janssen R, Damen WGM. The ten Hox genes of the millipede Glomeris marginata. Dev Genes Evol 2006; 216:451-465. (Pubitemid 44057488)
19. Damen WGM. fushi tarazu: A Hox gene changes its role. BioEssays 2002; 24:992-995.
20. Mittmann B, Scholtz G. Development of the nervous system in the "head" of Limulus polyphemus (Chelicerata: Xiphosura): morphological evidence for a correspondence between the segments of the chelicerae and of the (first) antennae of Mandibulata. Dev Genes Evol 2003; 213:9-17. (Pubitemid 36305548)
21. Harzsch S, Wildt M, Battelle B et al. Immunohistochemical localization of neurotransmitters in the nervous system of larval Limulus polyphemus (Chelicerata, Xiphosura): evidence for a conserved protocerebral architecture in Euarthropoda. Arthropod Struct Dev 2005; 34:327-342. (Pubitemid 41253547)
22. Viallanes MH. Etudes histologiques et organologiques sur les centres nerveux et les organs de sens des animaux articules. Ann Sci Nat Serv VII Zool 1893; 14:405-456.
23. Goodrich ES. On the relation of the arthropod head to the annelid prostomium. Q J Microsc Sci 1897; 40:147-268.
24. Dunlop JA, Arango CP. Pycnogonid affinities: a review. Journal of Zoology, Systematics and Evolutionary Research 2005; 43:8-21. (Pubitemid 40263098)
25. Mallatt J, Giribet G. Further use of nearly complete 28S and 18S rRNA genes to classify Ecdysozoa: 37 more arthropods and a kinorhynch. Mol Phylogenet Evol 2006; 40:772-794. (Pubitemid 44163250)
26. Maxmen A, Browne WE, Martindale MQ et al. Neuroanatomy of sea spiders implies an appendicular origin of the protocerebral segment. Nature 2005; 437:1144-1148. (Pubitemid 41509350)
27. Budd GE. A palaeontological solution to the arthropod head problem. Nature 2002; 417:271-275. (Pubitemid 34534706)
28. Budd GE, Telford MJ. Along came a sea spider. Nature 2005; 437:1099-1102.
29. Weygoldt P. Ontogeny of the arachnid central nervous system. In: Barth FG, ed. Neurobiology of Arachnids. Heidelberg Springer Verlag 1985:20-37.
30. Averof M, Patel NH. Crustacean appendage evolution associated with changes in Hox gene expression. Nature 1997; 388:682-686. (Pubitemid 27366440)