The effects of pore architecture in silk fibroin scaffolds on the growth and differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells expressing BMP7

Acta Biomaterialia

Volumn 6, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 3021-3028

  Zhang, Yufeng ^a,b   Fan, Wei ^b   Ma, Zhaocheng ^c   Wu, Chengtie ^b   Fang, Wei ^a,b   Liu, Gang ^b   Xiao, Yin ^a,b  

^a WUHAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

^c HUAZHONG AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Bone; Bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cell; Bone morphogenetic protein; Silk fibroin scaffold

Indexed keywords

ARCHITECTURE; BIOACTIVITY; CELL CULTURE; CELL ENGINEERING; CELL PROLIFERATION; PHOSPHATASES; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PORE SIZE; SCAFFOLDS (BIOLOGY); STEM CELLS; TRANSCRIPTION;

BONE FORMATION; BONE MARROW MESENCHYMAL; BONE MARROW MESENCHYMAL STROMAL CELL; BONE MORPHOGENETIC PROTEINS; MESENCHYMAL STEM CELL; MESENCHYMAL STROMAL CELLS; PORE ARCHITECTURE; SILK FIBROIN; SILK FIBROIN SCAFFOLD; TISSUES ENGINEERINGS;

BONE;

ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE; OSTEOGENIC PROTEIN 1; SILK FIBROIN; FIBROIN; TISSUE SCAFFOLD;

ARTICLE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL GROWTH; CELL MIGRATION; CELL SECRETION; CELL VIABILITY; COLORIMETRY; CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; IN VIVO STUDY; MESENCHYMAL STEM CELL; NANOPORE; OSSIFICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTION POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SCID MOUSE; ANIMAL; BIOASSAY; CELL PROLIFERATION; CHEMISTRY; CYTOLOGY; DRUG EFFECT; ENZYME ASSAY; ENZYMOLOGY; HUMAN; INFLAMMATION; METABOLISM; MOUSE; MOUSE MUTANT; PATHOLOGY; PHENOTYPE; POROSITY; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

MUS;

ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE; ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL ASSAY; BONE MORPHOGENETIC PROTEIN 7; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; ENZYME ASSAYS; FIBROINS; HUMANS; INFLAMMATION; MESENCHYMAL STEM CELLS; MICE; MICE, SCID; PHENOTYPE; POROSITY; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; TISSUE SCAFFOLDS;

EID: 77956625586     PISSN: 17427061     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.02.030     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Griffith LG, Naughton G. Tissue engineering - current challenges and expanding opportunities. Science 2002; 295 (5557): 1009-14.
2. Langer R, Vacanti JP. Tissue engineering. Science 1993; 260 (5110): 920-6.
3. Pittenger MF, Mackay AM, Beck SC, Jaiswal RK, Douglas R, Mosca JD, et al. Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Science 1999; 284 (5411): 143-7.
4. Tsutsumi S, Shimazu A, Miyazaki K, Pan H, Koike C, Yoshida E, et al. Retention of multilineage differentiation potential of mesenchymal cells during proliferation in response to FGF. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2001; 288 (2): 413-9.
5. Sakou T. Bone morphogenetic proteins: from basic studies to clinical approaches. Bone 1998; 22 (6): 591-603.
6. Li C, Vepari C, Jin HJ, Kim HJ, Kaplan DL. Electrospun silk-BMP-2 scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2006; 27 (16): 3115-24.
7. Karageorgiou V, Tomkins M, Fajardo R, Meinel L, Snyder B, Wade K, et al. Porous silk fibroin 3-D scaffolds for delivery of bone morphogenetic protein-2 in vitro and in vivo. J Biomed Mater Res A 2006; 78 (2): 324-34.
8. Hofmann S, Hagenmuller H, Koch AM, Muller R, Vunjak-Novakovic G, Kaplan DL, et al. Control of in vitro tissue-engineered bone-like structures using human mesenchymal stem cells and porous silk scaffolds. Biomaterials 2007; 28 (6): 1152-62.
9. Mandal BB, Kundu SC. Osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation of rat bone marrow cells on non-mulberry and mulberry silk gland fibroin 3D scaffolds. Biomaterials 2009; 30 (28): 5019-503.
10. Zhang R, Ma PX. Synthetic nano-fibrillar extracellular matrices with predesigned macroporous architectures. J Biomed Mater Res 2000; 52 (2): 430-8.
11. Karande TS, Ong JL, Agrawal CM. Diffusion in musculoskeletal tissue engineering scaffolds: design issues related to porosity, permeability, architecture, and nutrient mixing. Ann Biomed Eng 2004; 32 (12): 1728-43.
12. Zhang Y, Song J, Shi B, Wang Y, Chen X, Huang C, et al. Combination of scaffold and adenovirus vectors expressing bone morphogenetic protein-7 for alveolar bone regeneration at dental implant defects. Biomaterials 2007; 28 (31): 4635-42.
13. Sofia S, McCarthy MB, Gronowicz G, Kaplan DL. Functionalized silk-based biomaterials for bone formation. J Biomed Mater Res 2001; 54 (1): 139-48.
14. Fowler JM, Stuart MC, Wong DK. Self-assembled layer of thiolated protein G as an immunosensor scaffold. Anal Chem 2007; 79 (1): 350-4.
15. He TC, Zhou S, Da Costa LT, Yu J, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B. A simplified system for generating recombinant adenoviruses. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1998; 95 (5): 2509-14.
16. Whitehead MA, Fan D, Mukherjee P, Akkaraju GR, Canham LT, Coffer JL. Highporosity poly (epsilon-caprolactone)/mesoporous silicon scaffolds: calcium phosphate deposition and biological response to bone precursor cells. Tissue Eng A 2008; 14 (1): 195-206.
17. Mareddy S, Crawford R, Brooke G, Xiao Y. Clonal isolation and characterization of bone marrow stromal cells from patients with osteoarthritis. Tissue Eng 2007; 13 (4): 819-29.
18. Xiao Y, Qian H, Young WG, Bartold PM. Tissue engineering for bone regeneration using differentiated alveolar bone cells in collagen scaffolds. Tissue Eng 2003;9(6):1167-77.
19. Boyan BD, Hummert TW, Dean DD, Schwartz Z. Role of material surfaces in regulating bone and cartilage cell response. Biomaterials 1996; 17 (2): 137-46.
20. Ishaug SL, Crane GM, Miller MJ, Yasko AW, Yaszemski MJ, Mikos AG. Bone formation by three-dimensional stromal osteoblast culture in biodegradable polymer scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res 1997; 36 (1): 17-28.
21. Hulbert SF, Young FA, Mathews RS, Klawitter JJ, Talbert CD, Stelling FH. Potential of ceramic materials as permanently implantable skeletal prostheses. J Biomed Mater Res 1970;4(3):433-56.
22. Zeltinger J, Sherwood JK, Graham DA, Mueller R, Griffith LG. Effect of pore size and void fraction on cellular adhesion, proliferation, and matrix deposition. Tissue Eng 2001;7(5):557-72.
23. Lee M, Wu BM, Dunn JC. Effect of scaffold architecture and pore size on smooth muscle cell growth. J Biomed Mater Res A 2008; 87 (4): 1010-6.
24. Kasten P, Beyen I, Niemeyer P, Luginbuhl R, Bohner M, Richter W. Porosity and pore size of beta-tricalcium phosphate scaffold can influence protein production and osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells: an in vitro and in vivo study. Acta Biomater 2008;4(6):1904-15.
25. Misawa H, Kobayashi N, Soto-Gutierrez A, Chen Y, Yoshida A, Rivas-Carrillo JD, et al. PuraMatrix facilitates bone regeneration in bone defects of calvaria in mice. Cell Transplant 2006; 15 (10): 903-10.
26. Caplan AI, Goldberg VM. Principles of tissue engineered regeneration of skeletal tissues. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999; 367 (Suppl.): S12-6.
27. Blum JS, Barry MA, Mikos AG. Bone regeneration through transplantation of genetically modified cells. Clin Plast Surg 2003; 30 (4): 611-20.
28. Meijer GJ, de Bruijn JD, Koole R, van Blitterswijk CA. Cell-based bone tissue engineering. PLoS Med 2007;4(2):e9.
29. Jiang X, Zhao J, Wang S, Sun X, Zhang X, Chen J, et al. Mandibular repair in rats with premineralized silk scaffolds and BMP-2-modified bMSCs. Biomaterials 2009; 30 (27): 4522-32.