Measuring team process for quality improvement

Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 282-293

  Strasser, Dale ^a   Burridge, Andrea ^b   Falconer, Judith ^c   Herrin, Jeph ^d   Uomoto, Jay ^e  

^a EMORY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON   (United States)

^c NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS   (United States)

Author keywords

patient care teams; process measures; quality of health care; stroke rehabilitation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRONBACH ALPHA COEFFICIENT; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; LEADERSHIP; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT CARE; PREDICTION; PSYCHOMETRY; RATING SCALE; REHABILITATION CARE; RELIABILITY; SCORING SYSTEM; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; VALIDITY;

DIAGNOSIS-RELATED GROUPS; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; HUMANS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PSYCHOMETRICS; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; STROKE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 77956607521     PISSN: 10749357     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1310/tsr1704-282     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Dowla N, Chan BS, Chan L, Improving quality in stroke rehabilitation. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2010;17(4):xx-xx.
2. Hoeing H, Lee J, Stineman M, Conceptual overview of frameworks for measuring quality in rehabilitation. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2010;17(4):239-251.
3. Duncan PW, Velozo CA. State-of-the-science on postacute rehabilitation: measurement and methodologies for assessing quality and establishing policy for postacute care. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88:1482-1487.
4. Strasser DC. Challenge and opportunities for quality rehabilitation. In: Flanagan, Zaretsky SR, Morez HA, eds. Medical Aspects of Disability: A Handbook for the Rehabilitation Professional. 4th ed. New York: Springer; 2010.
5. Zorowitz R. Stroke rehabilitation quality indicators: raising the bar in the inpatient rehabilitation facility. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2010;17(4):294-304.
6. Strasser DC, Falconer JA. Rehabilitation team process. Top Stroke Rehabil. 1997;4(2):34-39.
7. Strasser DC, Smits SJ, Falconer JA, Herrin JS, Bowen SE. Team functioning and patient outcomes in stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:403-409.
8. Smits SJ, Falconer JA, Herrin J, Bowen SE, Strasser DC. Patient focused rehabilitation team cohesiveness in Veterans Administration hospitals. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84:1332-1338.
9. Strasser DC, Falconer JA, Stevens AB, et al. Team training and stroke rehabilitation outcomes: a cluster randomized trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;9:10-15.
10. Stevens AS, Strasser DC, Uomoto J, Bowen SE, Falconer JA. Utility of treatment implementation methods in a clinical trial with rehabilitation teams. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2007;44:537-546.
11. McHorney CA. Use of items response theory to link 3 modules of functional status items from the Asset and Health Dynamics Among the Oldest Old study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83:383-394.
12. Marino RJ, Graves DE, Metrics properties of the ASI motor score: subscales improve correlation with functional activities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:1804-1810.
13. Luther SL, Jeffrey K, Powell-Cope G, et al. A pilot study to modify the SF-36V Physical Functioning Scale for use with veterans with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87(8):1059-1066. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.05.010. (Pubitemid 44107854)
14. Reckase MD. Unifactor latent trait models applied to multifactor tests: Results and implications. J Educ Stat. 1979;4:207-230.
15. Strasser DC, Falconer JA, Martino-Saltzmann D. The rehabilitation team: staff perceptions of the hospital environment, the interdisciplinary team environment, and interprofessional relations. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75: 177-182.
16. Moos RH. The Social Climate Scales: A User's Guide. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologist Press; 1994.
17. Hambleton RK, Swaminathan H, Rogers HJ. Fundamentals of Item Response Theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 1991.
18. Bock RD, Gibbons R, Schilling SG, Murak E, Wilson DT, Wood R. TESTFACT 4.0 [Computer software and manual]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientifi c Software International; 2003.
19. Muraki E. A generalized partial credit model: application of an EM algorithm. Appl Psychol Measure. 1992;16:159-176.
20. Muraki E, Bock R. PARSCALE 4: IRT item analysis and test scoring for rating-scale data [computer program]. Chicago, IL: Scientifi c Software; 2003.
21. Glickman ME, Pradipta S, Eisen SV. A nonparametric Bayesian diagnostic for detecting differential item functioning in IRT models. Health Serv Outcomes Res Method. 2009;9(3):145-161. doi: 10.1007/s10742-009-0052-4.
22. Stineman MG, Fiedler JA, et al. Impairment-specifi c dimensions within the Functional Independence Measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;78:636-643.
23. Carson JB, Tesluk PE, Marrone JA. Shared leadership in teams; an investigation of antecedent of conditions and performance. Acad Manage J. 2007;50(5):1217-1234.