PH-tunable ion selectivity in carbon nanotube pores

Langmuir

Volumn 26, Issue 18, 2010, Pages 14848-14853

  Fornasiero, Francesco ^a   In, Jung Bin ^b   Kim, Sangil ^c   Park, Hyung Gyu ^d   Wang, Yinmin ^a   Grigoropoulos, Costas P ^b   Noy, Aleksandr ^a,e   Bakajin, Olgica ^c,f  

^a LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c Porifera Inc   (United States)

^d ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATOMIC SCALE; BINARY ELECTROLYTE; BINARY SALTS; BIOLOGICAL PROCESS; CARBOXYLIC GROUP; CELLULAR PROCESS; CHEMICAL INERTNESS; COMMON CATION; FLUID SEPARATION; ION CHANNEL; ION CONTENT; ION PERMEATION; ION REJECTION; ION SELECTIVITY; ION TRANSPORTS; MONOVALENT ANIONS; NANO CHANNELS; PRESSURE-DRIVEN FLOWS; SILICON NITRIDE MEMBRANE; SOLUTION COMPOSITION; SOLUTION PH; TUNABILITIES;

BINARY MIXTURES; BIOPHYSICS; CRYSTAL ATOMIC STRUCTURE; NEGATIVE IONS; PRESSURE EFFECTS; SILICON NITRIDE; TRANSPORT PROPERTIES;

CARBON NANOTUBES;

CARBON NANOTUBE; INORGANIC SALT;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; DIFFUSION; ION TRANSPORT; METHODOLOGY; NANOTECHNOLOGY; PERMEABILITY; PH; POROSITY; PRESSURE; STATIC ELECTRICITY;

DIFFUSION; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; ION TRANSPORT; NANOTECHNOLOGY; NANOTUBES, CARBON; PERMEABILITY; POROSITY; PRESSURE; SALTS; STATIC ELECTRICITY;

EID: 77956599619     PISSN: 07437463     EISSN: 15205827     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/la101943h     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Schoch, R. B.; Han, J. Y.; Renaud, P. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2008, 80, 839-883
2. Abgrall, P.; Nguyen, N. T. Anal. Chem. 2008, 80, 2326-2341
3. Sparreboom, W.; van den Berg, A.; Eijkel, J. C. T. Nature Nanotechnol. 2009, 4, 713-720
4. Ho, C.; Qiao, R.; Heng, J. B.; Chatterjee, A.; Timp, R. J.; Aluru, N. R.; Timp, G. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2005, 102, 10445-10450
5. Martin, C. R.; Nishizawa, M.; Jirage, K.; Kang, M. S.; Lee, S. B. Adv. Mater. 2001, 13, 1351-1362
6. Nishizawa, M.; Menon, V. P.; Martin, C. R. Science 1995, 268, 700-702
7. Scruggs, N. R.; Robertson, J. W. F.; Kasianowicz, J. J.; Migler, K. B. Nano Lett. 2009, 9, 3853-3859
8. Daiguji, H.; Yang, P. D.; Szeri, A. J.; Majumdar, A. Nano Lett. 2004, 4, 2315-2321
9. van der Heyden, F. H. J.; Bonthuis, D. J.; Stein, D.; Meyer, C.; Dekker, C. Nano Lett. 2007, 7, 1022-1025
10. Daiguji, H.; Yang, P. D.; Majumdar, A. Nano Lett. 2004, 4, 137-142
11. Karnik, R.; Fan, R.; Yue, M.; Li, D. Y.; Yang, P. D.; Majumdar, A. Nano Lett. 2005, 5, 943-948
12. Goldberger, J.; Fan, R.; Yang, P. D. Acc. Chem. Res. 2006, 39, 239-248
13. Schrlau, M. G.; Brailoiu, E.; Patel, S.; Gogotsi, Y.; Dun, N. J.; Bau, H. H. Nanotechnology 2008, 19.
14. Liu, H. T.; He, J.; Tang, J. Y.; Liu, H.; Pang, P.; Cao, D.; Krstic, P.; Joseph, S.; Lindsay, S.; Nuckolls, C. Science 2010, 327, 64-67
15. Howorka, S.; Siwy, Z. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 2360-2384
16. Shannon, M. A.; Bohn, P. W.; Elimelech, M.; Georgiadis, J. G.; Marinas, B. J.; Mayes, A. M. Nature 2008, 452, 301-310
17. Hille, B. Ion Channel of Excitable Membranes, 3 rd ed.; Sinauer Associates, Inc.: Sunderland, 2001; p 814.
18. Noy, A.; Park, H. G.; Fornasiero, F.; Holt, J. K.; Grigoropoulos, C. P.; Bakajin, O. Nano Today 2007, 2, 22-29
19. Whitby, M.; Quirke, N. Nature Nanotechnol. 2007, 2, 87-94
20. Holt, J. K. Adv. Mater. 2009, 21, 1-9
21. Holt, J. K.; Park, H. G.; Wang, Y. M.; Stadermann, M.; Artyukhin, A. B.; Grigoropoulos, C. P.; Noy, A.; Bakajin, O. Science 2006, 312, 1034-1037
22. Majumder, M.; Chopra, N.; Andrews, R.; Hinds, B. J. Nature 2005, 438, 44-44
23. Majumder, M.; Zhan, X.; Andrews, R.; Hinds, B. J. Langmuir 2007, 23, 8624-8631
24. Nednoor, P.; Chopra, N.; Gavalas, V.; Bachas, L. G.; Hinds, B. J. Chem. Mater. 2005, 17, 3595-3599
25. Nednoor, P.; Gavalas, V. G.; Chopra, N.; Hinds, B. J.; Bachas, L. G. J. Mater. Chem. 2007, 17, 1755-1757
26. Nicholson, D.; Quirke, N. Mol. Simul. 2003, 29, 287-290
27. Liu, H. M.; Murad, S.; Jameson, C. J. J. Chem. Phys. 2006, 125, 14
28. Shao, Q.; Huang, L. L.; Zhou, J.; Lu, L. H.; Zhang, L. Z.; Lu, X. H.; Jiang, S. Y.; Gubbins, K. E.; Shen, W. F. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2008, 10, 1896-1906
29. Shao, Q.; Zhou, J.; Lu, L. H.; Lu, X. H.; Zhu, Y. D.; Jiang, S. Y. Nano Lett. 2009, 9, 989-994
30. Yang, L.; Garde, S. J. Chem. Phys. 2007, 126.
31. Leung, K.; Rempe, S. B.; Lorenz, C. D. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006, 96, 4
32. Sumikama, T.; Saito, S.; Ohmine, I. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 20671-20677
33. Won, C. Y.; Aluru, N. R. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2009, 478, 185-190
34. Park, J. H.; Sinnott, S. B.; Aluru, N. R. Nanotechnology 2006, 17, 895-900
35. Joseph, S.; Mashl, R. J.; Jakobsson, E.; Aluru, N. R. Nano Lett. 2003, 3, 1399-1403
36. Corry, C. J. Phys. Chem. B 2008, 112, 1427-1434
37. Song, C.; Corry, B. J. Phys. Chem. B 2009, 113, 7642-7649
38. Hummer, G. Mol. Phys. 2007, 105, 201-207
39. Peter, C.; Hummer, G. Biophys. J. 2005, 89, 2222-2234
40. Carrillo-Tripp, M.; San-Roman, M. L.; Hernandez-Cobos, J.; Saint-Martin, H.; Ortega-Blake, I. In Ion Hydration in Nanopores and the Molecular Basis of Selectivity; 230th National Meeting of the American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, Aug 28-Sep 01, 2005; pp 243-250.
41. Carrillo-Tripp, M.; Saint-Martin, H.; Ortega-Blake, I. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004, 93.
42. Tang, Y. W.; Chan, K. Y.; Szalai, I. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 18204-18213
43. Beckstein, O.; Sansom, M. S. P. Phys. Biol. 2004, 1, 42-52
44. Beckstein, O.; Tai, K.; Sansom, M. S. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 14694-14695
45. Hilder, T. A.; Gordon, D.; Chung, S. H. Small 2009, 5, 2183-2190
46. Liu, H. M.; Jameson, C. J.; Murad, S. In Molecular Dynamics Simulation of Ion Selectivity Process in Nanopores; Annual Meeting of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers, Salt Lake City, UT, Nov 09, 2007; pp 169-175.
47. Fornasiero, F.; Park, H. G.; Holt, J. K.; Stadermann, M.; Grigoropoulos, C. P.; Noy, A.; Bakajin, O. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2008, 105, 17250-17255
48. Wei, J. Q.; Jiang, B.; Zhang, X. F.; Zhu, H. W.; Wu, D. H. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2003, 376, 753-757
49. Wei, J. Q.; Ci, L. J.; Jiang, B.; Li, Y. H.; Zhang, X. F.; Zhu, H. W.; Xu, C. L.; Wu, D. H. J. Mater. Chem. 2003, 13, 1340-1344
50. 2 is close to zero in all cases, measurements for this salt do not provide useful information for a membrane performance comparison.
51. Bowen, W. R.; Mukhtar, H. J. Membr. Sci. 1996, 112, 263-274
52. Garcia-Aleman, J.; Dickson, J.; Mika, A. J. Membr. Sci. 2004, 240, 237-255
53. Garcia-Aleman, J.; Dickson, J. M. J. Membr. Sci. 2004, 239, 163-172
54. Tsuru, T.; Urairi, M.; Nakao, S.; Kimura, S. Desalination 1991, 81, 219-227
55. Tsuru, T.; Urairi, M.; Nakao, S.; Kimura, S. J. Chem. Eng. Jpn. 1991, 24, 518-524
56. Dey, T. K.; Ramachandhran, V.; Misra, B. M. Desalination 2000, 127, 165-175
57. Gilron, J.; Gara, N.; Kedem, O. J. Membr. Sci. 2001, 185, 223-236
58. Hagmeyer, G.; Gimbel, R. Sep. Purif. Technol. 1999, 15, 19-30
59. Wang, K. Y.; Chung, T. S. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 247, 37-50
60. Yaroshchuk, A. E. In Negative Rejection of Ions in Pressure-Driven Membrane Processes; 33rd Conference on Membrane Electrochemistry, Krasnodar, Russia, May, 2007; Elsevier Science B.V.: Krasnodar, Russia, 2007; pp 150-173.
61. Ion rejection increases by increasing applied pressure because the water flux is more sensitive to the pressure driving force than the ionic flux; it decreases for more concentrated salt solutions because of the increased osmotic pressure and increased driving force for salt diffusion.
62. Osada, Y.; Nakagawa, T. Membrane Science and Technology. Marcel Dekker Inc.: New York, 1992.
63. Newman, J.; Thomas-Alyea, K. E. Electrochemical Systems, 3 rd ed.; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, 2004; p 647.
64. Nagai, Y.; Unsworth, L. D.; Koutsopoulos, S.; Zhang, S. J. Controlled Release 2006, 115, 18-25
65. Cerovic, L. S.; Milonjic, S. K.; Bahloul-Hourlier, D.; Doucey, B. Colloids Surf., A 2002, 197, 147-156
66. Nakamatsu, T.; Saito, N.; Ishizaki, C.; Ishizaki, K. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 1998, 18, 1273-1279
67. Albeit discrepancies are present in the literature, most of reported values of point of zero charge correspond to a pH in the range 5.5-8.5 for a silicon nitride surface. (65)
68. The pHs reported here are averages between the feed pH at the beginning of the filtration and at the conclusion of the experiment.
69. Schaep, J.; Van der Bruggen, B.; Vandecasteele, C.; Wilms, D. Sep. Purif. Technol. 1998, 14, 155-162
70. Wong, S. S.; Joselevich, E.; Woolley, A. T.; Cheung, C. L.; Lieber, C. M. Nature 1998, 394, 52-55
71. Wong, S. S.; Woolley, A. T.; Joselevich, E.; Cheung, C. L.; Lieber, C. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 8557-8558