Does the ThinPrep Imaging System increase the detection of high-risk HPV-positive ASC-US and AGUS the Women and Infants Hospital experience with over 200,000 cervical cytology cases

CytoJournal

Volumn 6, Issue , 2009, Pages

  Quddus, M ^a   Neves, Theresa ^a   Reilly, Mary ^a   Steinhoff, Margaret ^a   Sung, C ^a  

^a BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

AGUS; ASC US; TIS

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATYPICAL SQUAMOUS CELLS OF UNDETERMINED SIGNIFANCE; DNA DETERMINATION; FEMALE; HIGH RISK POPULATION; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; UTERINE CERVIX CYTOLOGY; UTERINE CERVIX DISEASE; UTERUS BIOPSY; WART VIRUS;

EID: 77956575908     PISSN: 09745963     EISSN: 17426413     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4103/1742-6413.54917     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Alves VA, Bibbo M, Schmitt FC, Milanezi F, Longatto Filho A. Comparison of manual and automated methods of liquid-based cytology: A morphologic study. Acta Cytol 2004;48:187-93.
2. Zhang FF, Banks HW, Langford SM, Davey DD. Accuracy of ThinPrep Imaging System in detecting low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2007;131:773-6.
3. Chivukula M, Saad RS, Elishaev E, White S, Mauser N, Dabbs DJ. Introduction of the Thin Prep Imaging System (TIS): Experience in a high volume academic practice. Cytojournal 2007;4:6.
4. Lozano R. Comparison of computer-assisted and manual screening of cervical cytology. Gynecol Oncol 2007;104:134-8.
5. Papillo JL, St John TL, Leiman G. Effectiveness of the ThinPrep Imaging System: clinical experience in a low risk screening population. Diagn Cytopathol 2008;36:155-60.
6. O'Brien D, Brainard J, Chen L, Pork A, Booth C. Comparison of HPV and Follow-up Data for ASC-H Before and After Implementation of the ThinPrep Imaging System. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) (Suppl) 2006;108:342.
7. Howard MT, Cohen DW, Underwood DL, Deeds DA, Booth CN. Utilization of ASC-H, LSIL, Cannot Exclude HSIL (LSIL-H) and HSIL Terminology Following Implementation of the ThinPrep Imaging System. Mod Pathol (Suppl 2) 2006;20:71A.
8. Bolger N, Heffron C, Regan I, Sweeney M, Kinsella S, McKeown M, Implementation and evaluation of new automated interactive image analysis sytem. Acta Cytol 2006 50:483-91
9. Thrall MJ, Russell DK, Bonfiglio TA, Hoda RS Use of the ThinPrep(R) Imaging System does not alter the frequency of interpreting Papanicolaou tests as atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Cytojournal 2008;5:10
10. Miller FS, Nagel LE, Kenny-Moynihan MB. Implementation of the ThinPrep Imaging System in a high-volume metropolitan laboratory. Diagn Cytopathol 2007;35:213-7.
11. Dziura B, Quinn S, Richard K. Performance of an imaging system vs. manual screening in the detection of squamous intraepithelial lesions of the uterine cervix. Acta Cytol 2007;50:309-11.
12. Friedlander MA, Rudomina D, Lin O. Effectiveness of the Thin Prep Imaging System in the detection of adenocarcinoma of the gynecologic system. Cancer 2008;114:7-12.
13. Biscotti CV, Dawson AE, Dziura B, Galup L, Darragh T, Rahemtulla A, et al. Assisted Primary Screening Using the Auomated ThinPrep Imaging System. Am J Clin Pathol 2005;123:281-7.
14. Wright TC Jr, Massad LS, Dunton CJ, Spitzer M, Wilkinson EJ, Solomon D, et al. 2006 Consensus guidelines for the management of women with abnormal cervical cancer screening tests. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;197:346-55.
15. Sabo D. Shorie JBC. Detection of adenocarcinoma using the ThinPrep Imaging System. Cancer Cytopathol 2005;105:374.
16. Hutchinson M, Lapen D, Wernecke S. Cancer detection with the ThinPrep Imaging System. Acta Cytol 2003;47:47.