Effects of land-use change on community composition of tropical amphibians and reptiles in Sulawesi, Indonesia;Efectos del cambio de uso de suelo sobre la composicíon de la comunidad de anfibios y reptiles en Sulawesi, Indonesia

Conservation Biology

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 795-802

  Wanger, Thomas C ^a,b   Iskandar, Djoko T ^c   Motzke, Iris ^b   Brook, Barry W ^a   Sodhi, Navjot S ^d,e   Clough, Yann ^b   Tscharntke, Teja ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

^c BANDUNG INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Indonesia)

^d NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^e HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Amphibians; Bayesian modeling; Cacao agroforestry; Indonesia; Land use change; Reptiles; Southeast Asia

Indexed keywords

ABUNDANCE; AGROFORESTRY; AMPHIBIAN; ANTHROPOGENIC EFFECT; BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; COMMUNITY DYNAMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL DISTURBANCE; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; EVERGREEN TREE; FOREST COVER; FOREST ECOSYSTEM; HABITAT TYPE; LAND USE CHANGE; LEAF LITTER; PLANTATION FORESTRY; PRUNING; REPTILE; SPECIES RICHNESS; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; TROPICAL FOREST; TURNOVER;

AMPHIBIA; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIODIVERSITY; CLASSIFICATION; INDONESIA; REPTILE;

AMPHIBIANS; ANIMALS; BIODIVERSITY; INDONESIA; REPTILES;

GREATER SUNDA ISLANDS; SULAWESI; SUNDA ISLES;

AMPHIBIA; REPTILIA; THEOBROMA CACAO;

EID: 77956566408     PISSN: 08888892     EISSN: 15231739     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01434.x     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Barlow, J., et al. 2007. Quantifying the biodiversity value of tropical primary, secondary, and plantation forests. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104:18555-18560.
2. Bawa, K. S., W. J. Kress, N. M. Nadkarni, S. Lele, P. H. Raven, D. H. Janzen, A. E. Lugo, P. S. Ashton, and T. E. Lovejoy. 2004. Tropical ecosystems into the 21st century. Science 306:227-228.
3. Clough, Y., A. Holzschuh, D. Gabriel, T. Purtauf, D. Kleijn, A. Kruess, I. Steffan-Dewenter, and T. Tscharntke. 2007. Alpha and beta diversity of arthropods and plants in organically and conventionally managed wheat fields. Journal of Applied Ecology 44:804-812.
4. Clough, Y., D. Dwi Putra, R. Pitopang, and T. Tscharntke. 2009a. Local and landscape factors determine functional bird diversity in Indonesian cacao agroforestry. Biological Conservation 142:1032-1041.
5. Clough, Y., H. Faust, and T. Tscharntke. 2009b. Cacao boom and bust: sustainability of agroforests and opportunities for biodiversity conservation. Conservation Letters: 2:197-205.
6. de Lang, R., and G. Vogel 2005. The snakes of Sulawesi. A field guide to the land snakes of Sulawesi with identification keys. Edition Chimaira, Frankfurt.
7. Direktorat Jenderal Perkebunan. 2008. Statistik Perkebunan Indonesia 2006-2008. Departemen Pertanian Direktorat Jenderal Perkebunan, Jakarta.
8. Faria, D., M. L. B. Paciencia, M. Dixo, R. R. Laps, and J. Baumgarten. 2007. Ferns, frogs, lizards, birds and bats in forest frag-ments and shade cacao plantations in two contrasting landscapes in the Atlantic forest, Brazil. Biodiversity and Conservation 16:2335-2357.
9. Foley, J. A., et al. 2005. Global consequences of land use. Science 309:570-574.
10. Gardner, T. A., J. Barlow, and C. A. Peres. 2007. Paradox, presumption and pitfalls in conservation biology: the importance of habitat change for amphibians and reptiles. Biological Conservation 138:166-179.
11. Gillespie, G., S. Howard, D. Lockie, M. Scroggie, and Boeadi. 2005. Herpetofaunal richness and community structure of offshore islands of Sulawesi, Indonesia. Biotropica 37:279-290.
12. Golicher, D. J., R. B. O'Hara, L. Ruiz-Montoya, and L. Cayuela. 2006. Lifting a veil on diversity: a Bayesian approach to fitting relative-abundance models. Ecological Applications 16:202-212.
13. Huey,R.B.,C.A.Deutsch,J.J.Tewksbury,L.J.Vitt,P.E.Hertz,H. J. A. Pérez, and T. Garland. 2009. Why tropical forest lizards are vulnerable to climate warming. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2008.1957.
14. Inger, R. F., and R. Colwell. 1977. Organization of contiguous communities of amphibians and reptiles in Thailand. Ecological Monographs 47:229-253.
15. IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature). 2008. Red List of threatened species. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland. Available from: http://www.iucnredlist.org (accessed December 2008).
16. King, D. I., M. D. Hernandez-Mayorga, R. Trubey, R. Raudales, and J. H. Rappole. 2007. An evaluation of the contribution of cultivated allspice (Pimenta dioca) to vertebrate biodiversity conservation in Nicaragua. Biodiversity and Conservation 16:1299-1320.
17. Koh, L. P. 2008. Can oil palm plantations be made more hospitable for forest butterflies and birds? Journal of Applied Ecology 45:1002-1009.
18. Luja, V. H., S. Herrando-Perez, D. Gonzalez-Solis, and L. Luiselli. 2008. Secondary rain forests are not havens for reptile species in tropical Mexico. Biotropica 40:747-757.
19. Magurran, A. E. 2004. Measuring biological diversity. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, United Kingdom.
20. Manthey, U., and W. Grossmann. 1997. Amphibien und Reptilien Südostasiens. Natur und Tier Verlag, Münster.
21. McKay, J. L. 2006. A field guide to the amphibians and reptiles of Bali. Krieger Publishing, Malabar, Florida.
22. Pineda, E., and G. Halffter. 2004. Species diversity and habitat fragmentation: frogs in a tropical montane landscape in Mexico. Biological Conservation 117:499-508.
23. Pineda, E., C. Moreno, F. Escobar, and G. Halffter. 2005. Frog, bat, and dung beetle diversity in the cloud forest and coffee agroecosystems of Veracruz, Mexico. Conservation Biology 19:400-410.
24. Qian, S. S., and Z. Shen. 2007. Ecological applications of multilevel analysis of variance. Ecology 88:2489-2495.
25. Rödel, M.-O., and R. Ernst. 2004. Measuring and monitoring amphibian diversity in tropical forests. I. An evaluation of methods with recommendations for standardization. Ecotropica 10:1-14.
26. Shahabuddin, C. H., Schulze, and T. Tscharntke. 2005. Changes of dung beetle communities from rainforests towards agroforestry systems and annual cultures in Sulawesi (Indonesia). Biodiversity and Conservation 14:863-877.
27. Sodhi, N. S., D. Bickford, A. C. Diesmos, T. Lee, L. P. Koh, B. W. Brook, C. H. Sekercioglu, and C. J. A. Bradshaw. 2008. Measuring the meltdown: drivers of global amphibian extinction and decline. Public Library of Science ONE DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001636.
28. Sodhi, N. S., M. Posa, T. Lee, D. Bickford, L. Koh, and B. W. Brook. 2009. The state and conservation of Southeast Asian biodiversity. Biodiversity and Conservation DOI: 10.1007/s10531-009-9607-5.
29. Spiegelhalter, D. J., N. G. Best, B. R. Carlin, and A. Van Der Linde. 2002. Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B-Statistical Methodology 64:583-616.
30. Suaz-Ortuno, I., J. Alvarado-Diaz, and M. Martinez-Ramos. 2008. Effects of conversion of dry tropical forest to agricultural mosaic on herpetofaunal assemblages. Conservation Biology 22:362-374.
31. Wake, D. B., and V. T. Vredenburg. 2008. Are we in the midst of the sixth mass extinction? A view from the world of amphibians. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105:11466-11473.
32. Wanger,T.C.,A.Saro,D.T.Iskandar,B.W.Brook,N.S.Sodhi,Y. Clough, and T. Tscharntke. 2009. Conservation value of cacao agro-forestry for amphibians and reptiles in Southeast Asia: combining correlative models with follow-up field experiments. Journal of Applied Ecology 46:823-832.
33. Whitfield, S. M., K. E. Bell, T. Philippi, M. Sasa, F. Bolanos, G. Chaves, J. M. Savage, and M. A. Donnelly. 2007. Amphibian and reptile declines over 35 years at La Selva, Costa Rica. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104:8352-8356.
34. Whitten, A. J., M. Mustafa, and G. S. Henderson. 2002. The ecology of Sulawesi. 2nd edition. Gadjah Mada University Press, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.