New development and validation of a scenario-based measure of sexual aggression tendencies;Neuentwicklung und Validierung eines szenariobasierten Verfahrens zur Erfassung der Neigung zu sexueller Aggression

Diagnostica

Volumn 55, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 117-127

  Eyssel, Friederike ^a   Bohner, Gerd ^a   Philipp Sussenbach ^a   Schreiber, Paul ^a  

^a BIELEFELD UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Rape myth acceptance; Rape proclivity; Sexual violence

Indexed keywords

EID: 67649550639     PISSN: 00121924     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1026/0012-1924.55.2.117     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Abrams, D., Viki, G. T., asser, B.&Bohner, G. (2003). Perceptions of stranger and acquaintance rape: The role of benevolent and hostile sexism in victim blame and rape proclivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 111-125.
2. Bohner, G. (1998). Vergewaltigungsmythen. Landau: Verlag Empirische Pädagogik.
3. Bohner, G., Jarvis, C. I., Eyssel, F.&Siebler, F. (2005). The causal impact of rape myths acceptance on men's rape proclivity: Comparing sexually coercive and noncoercive men. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 819-828.
4. Bohner, G., Reinhard, M.-A., Rutz, S., Sturm, S., Kerschbaum, B.&Effler, D. (1998). Rape myths as neutralizing cognitions: Evidence for a causal impact of anti-victim attitudes on men's self-reported likelihood of raping. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 257-268.
5. Bohner, G., Siebler, F.&Schmelcher, J. (2006). Social norms and the likelihood of raping: Perceived rape myth acceptance of others affects men's rape proclivity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 286-297.
6. Burt, M. R. (1980). Cultural myths and supports of rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 217-230.
7. Chiroro, P., Bohner, G., Viki, G. T.&Jarvis, C. I. (2004). Rape myth acceptance and rape proclivity: Expected dominance versus expected arousal as mediators in acquaintance-rape situations. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 427-442.
8. Costin, F. (1985). Beliefs about rape and women's social roles. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 14, 319-325.
9. Dalbert, C., Montada, L.&Schmitt, M. (1987). Glaube an eine gerechte Welt als Motiv: Validierungskorrelate zweier Skalen. Psychologische Beiträge, 29, 596-615.
10. Eckes, T.&Six-Materna, I. (1999). Hostilität und Benevolenz: Eine Skala zur Messung des ambivalenten Sexismus. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 30, 211-228.
11. Eyssel, F.&Bohner, G. (in press). Modern rape myths: The Acceptance of Modern Myths about Sexual Aggression scale. In M. A. Morrison&T. G. Morrison (Eds.), The psychology of modern prejudice. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
12. Eyssel, F., Bohner, G.&Siebler, F. (2006). Perceived rape myth acceptance of others predicts rape proclivity: Social norm or judgmental anchoring? Swiss Journal of Psychology, 65, 93-99.
13. Gerger, H., Kley, H., Bohner, G.&Siebler, F. (2007). The Acceptance of Modern Myths About Sexual Aggression (AMMSA) Scale: Development and validation in German and English. Aggressive Behavior, 33, 422-440.
14. Glick, P.&Fiske, S. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491-512.
15. Koss, M. P.&Oros, C. J. (1982). Sexual Experiences Survey: A research instrument investigating sexual aggression and victimization. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50, 455-457.
16. Krahé, B., Scheinberger-Olwig, R.&Waizenhöfer, E. (1999). Sexuelle Aggression zwischen Jugendlichen: Eine Prävalenzerhebung mit Ost-West-Vergleich. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 30, 165-178.
17. Lisak, D.&Roth, S. (1988). Motivational factors in nonincarcerated sexually aggressive men. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 795-802.
18. Lonsway, K. A.&Fitzgerald, L. F. (1994). Rape myths: In review. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 133-164.
19. Malamuth, N. M. (1981). Rape proclivity among males. Journal of Social Issues, 37, 138-157.
20. Malamuth, N. M. (1989 a). The attraction to sexual aggression scale: Part one. The Journal of Sex Research, 26, 26-49.
21. Malamuth, N. M. (1989 b). The attraction to sexual aggression scale: Part two. The Journal of Sex Research, 26, 324-354.
22. Murnen, S. K., Wright, C.&Kaluzny, G. (2002). If Žboys will be boys," then girls will be victims? A meta-analytic review of the research that relates masculine ideology to sexual aggression. Sex Roles, 46, 359-375.
23. Musch, J., Brockhaus, R.&Bröder, A. (2002). Ein Inventar zur Erfassung von zwei Faktoren sozialer Erwünschtheit. Diagnostica, 48, 121-129.
24. Paulhus, D. L. (1998). The Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding. Toronto/Buffalo: Multi-Health Systems.
25. Payne, D. L., Lonsway, K. A.&Fitzgerald, L. F. (1999). Rape myth acceptance: Exploration of its structure and its measurement using the Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 33, 27-68.
26. Ross, R. R.&Allgeier, E. R. (1996). Behind the pencil/paper measurement of sexual coercion: Interview-based clarification of men's interpretation of Sexual Experiences Survey items. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26, 1587-1616.
27. Stöber, J. (1999). Die Soziale-Erwünschtheits-Skala-17 (SES- 17). Entwicklung und erste Befunde zu Reliabilität und Validität. Diagnostica, 45, 173-177.
28. Tieger, T. (1981). Self-rated likelihood of raping and the social perception of rape. Journal of Research in Personality, 15, 147-158.