Conceptualizing teacher immediacy through the 'companion' metaphor

Teaching in Higher Education

Volumn 15, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 531-542

  Sibii, Razvan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

Author keywords

Companion; Critical; Immediacy; Metaphor; Pedagogy

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956533052     PISSN: 13562517     EISSN: 14701294     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13562517.2010.491908     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Andersen, J.F. 1979. Teacher immediacy as a predictor of teaching effectiveness. In Communication yearbook 3, ed. D. Nimmo, 543-59. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
2. Andersen, P., and J. Andersen. 1982. Nonverbal immediacy in instruction. In Communication in the classroom, ed. L.L. Barker, 98-120. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
3. Campbell, E. 2003. The ethical teacher. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
4. Carr, D. 2000. Professionalism and ethics in teaching. New York: Routledge.
5. Denscombe, M. 1985. Classroom control: A sociological perspective. Boston, MA: George Allen & Unwin.
6. Follett, M.P. 1970. The teacher-student relation. Administrative Science Quarterly 15, no. 2: 137-48.
7. Freire, P. 1970. Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.
8. Jacobsen, C. 1991. Violations of the supervisory relationship: An ethical and educational blind spot. Social Work 36, no. 2: 130-5.
9. Jenkins, R. 2007. Your friendly neighborhood instructor. The Chronicle of Higher Education, January 31. http://chronicle.com/article/Your-Friendly-Neighborhood-/46667/ (accessed March 6, 2010).
10. Jewel, E.J., ed. 2002. The Oxford desk dictionary and thesaurus. 2nd American ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
11. MacKenzie, R.J. 1996. Setting limits in the classroom: How to move beyond the classroom dance of discipline. Rocklin, CA: Prima.
12. McCroskey, J.C., and V.P. Richmond. 1992. Increasing teacher influence through immediacy. In Power in the classroom: Communication, control, and concern, ed. V.P. Richmond and J.C. McCroskey. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13. Mehrabian, A. 1971. Silent messages. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
14. Pate-Bain, H., C. Achilles, J. Boyd-Zaharias, and B. McKenna. 2002. Class size does make a difference. In Readings for reflective teaching, ed. A. Pollard, 200-2. New York: Continuum.
15. Pellegrini, A. 1999. Pedagogy's turn: Observations on students, teachers, and transferencelove. Critical Inquiry 25, no. 3: 617-25.
16. Rex, L.A. 2006. Acting "cool" and "appropriate": Toward a framework for considering literacy classroom interactions when race is a factor. Journal of Literacy Research 39, no. 3. http://www-personal.umich.edu/-rex/Cool.pdf (accessed March 6, 2010).
17. Samuels, R. 2002. Being outside the circle: Postmodern composition, pedagogy, and psychoanalytic theory. In Pedagogical desire: Authority, seduction, transference, and the question of ethics, ed. J. Jagodzinski. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
18. Shelley, P.H. 2005. Colleges need to give students intensive care. The Chronicle of Higher Education, January 7. http://chronicle.com/article/Colleges-Need-to-Give-Students/16508 (accessed March 6, 2010).
19. Shor, I. 1992. Empowering education: Critical teaching for social change. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
20. Skeggs, B. 2004. Uneasy alignments, resourcing respectable subjectivity. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies 10, no. 2: 291-8.
21. Sweeton, N., and J. Davis. 2003-2004. The evolution of in loco parentis. Journal of Student Affairs 13. http://www.sahe.colostate.edu/Data/Sites/1/documents/journal/Journal2003-2004vol13/Loco-Parentis.pdf (accessed March 6, 2010).
22. Tobin, K., and S.U. LaMaster. 1992. An interpretation of high school science teaching based on metaphors and beliefs for specific roles. In Teacher personal theorizing: Connecting curriculum practice, theory, and research, ed. E.W. Ross, J.W. Cornett, and G. McCutcheon. Albany, GA: State University of New York Press.
23. Too, Y.L. 2000. The pedagogical contract: The economies of teaching and learning in the ancient world. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
24. Wanzer, M.B., and A.B. Frymier. 1999. The relationship between student perceptions of instructor humor and students' reports of learning. Communication Education 48, no. 1: 48-62.
25. Wilkins, A.C. 2008. Wannabes, goths, and christians: The boundaries of sex, style, and status. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
26. Woods, P. 2002. The self-determination of creative teachers. In Readings for reflective teaching, ed. A. Pollard. New York: Continuum.