Analysis of patients preferences: Direct assessment and discrete-choice experiment in therapy of adults with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder

Patient

Volumn 3, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 285-294

  Mühlbacher, Axel C ^a,b   N̈bling, Matthias ^b  

^a Hochschule Neubrandenburg   (Germany)

^b GEB Gesellschaft für Empirische Beratung mbH Empirical Consulting   (Germany)

Author keywords

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, treatment; Conjoint analysis; Patient preference

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ATTENTION DEFICIT DISORDER; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; DECISION MAKING; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FACTORIAL DESIGN; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MENTAL HEALTH SERVICE; PATIENT ADVOCACY; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RATING SCALE; SOCIAL STATUS;

EID: 77956523727     PISSN: 11781653     EISSN: 11781661     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2165/11584640-000000000-000009     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Barkley RA, Fischer M, Smallish L, et al. The persistence of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder into young adulthood as a function of reporting source and definition of disorder. J Abnorm Psychol 2002; 111 (2): 279-89
2. Faraone SV, Biederman J, Spencer T, et al. Attention-deficit/ hyperactivity disorder in adults: an overview. Biol Psychiatry 2000; 48 (1): 9-20
3. Able SL, Johnston JA, Adler LA, et al. Functional and psychosocial impairment in adults with undiagnosed ADHD. Psychol Med 2007; 37 (1): 97-107
4. Barkley RA. Challenges in diagnosing adults with ADHD. J Clin Psychiatry 2009; 69 (12): e36
5. Kendall T, Taylor E, Perez A, et al. Diagnosis and management of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children, young people, and adults: summary of NICE guidance. BMJ 2008 Sep 24; 337: a1239 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/extract/337/sep24-1/ a1239 [Accessed 2010 Aug 25]
6. Taylor E, Döpfner M, Sergeant J, et al. European clinical guidelines for hyperkinetic disorder: first upgrade. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2004; 13 Suppl. 1: I7-30
7. Wasserstein J. Diagnostic issues for adolescents and adults with ADHD. J Clin Psychol 2005; 61 (5): 535-47
8. Biederman J, Mick E, Faraone SV. Age-dependent decline of symptoms of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: impact of remission definition and symptom type. Am J Psychiatry 2000; 157 (5): 816-8
9. Edel M-A. Epidemiologie der ADHS. In: Edel M-A, Vollmoeller W, editors. Aufmerksamkeitsdefizit-/Hyperaktivita ̈tsstörung bei Erwachsenen. Heidelberg: Springer, 2005: XII, 157 S
10. Bundesärztekammer (2005) Stellungnahme zur " Aufmerksamkeitsdefizit-/ Hyperaktivitätsstörung (ADHS)" [online]. Available from URL: http://www.bundesaerztekammer. de/downloads/ADHSLang.pdf [Accessed 2010 Aug 18]
11. Döpfner M, Steinhausen HC, Coghill D, et al. Cross-cultural reliability and validity of ADHD assessed by the ADHD rating scale in a pan-European study [published erratum appears in Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2009; 18 (3): 194- 6]. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2006; 15 Suppl. 1: I46-55
12. Polanczyk G, de Lima MS, Horta BL, et al. The worldwide prevalence of ADHD: a systematic review and metaregression analysis. Am J Psychiatry 2007; 164 (6): 942-8
13. Harpin VA. The effect ofADHD on the life of an individual, their family, and community from preschool to adult life. Arch Dis Child 2005; 90 Suppl. 1: i2-7
14. Miranda A, Jarque S, Rosel J. Treatment of children with ADHD: psychopedagogical program at school versus psychostimulant medication. Psicothema 2006; 18 (3): 335-41
15. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: diagnosis and management of ADHD in children, young people and adults [clinical guideline 72]. London: NICE, 2008 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/ pdf/CG72NiceGuidelinev3. pdf [Accessed 2010 Aug 18]
16. Weiss M, Murray C. Assessment and management of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in adults. CMAJ 2003; 168 (6): 715-22
17. Banaschewski T, Coghill D, Santosh P, et al. Long-acting medications for the hyperkinetic disorders: a systematic review and European treatment guideline. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2006; 15 (8): 476-95
18. Cunningham CE, Deal K, Rimas H, et al. Modeling the information preferences of parents of children with mental health problems: a discrete choice conjoint experiment. J Abnorm Child Psychol 2008; 36 (7): 1123-38
19. Cunningham CE, Deal K, Rimas H, et al. Providing information to parents of children with mental health problems: a discrete choice conjoint analysis of professional preferences. J Abnorm Child Psychol 2009; 37 (8): 1089-102
20. Mühlbacher AC, Rudolph I, Lincke HJ, et al. Preferences for treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): a discrete choice experiment. BMC Health Serv Res 2009; 9: 149
21. Ryan M, Gerard K, Amaya-Amaya M, editors. Using discrete choice experiments to value health and health care. The economics of non-market goods and resources series. Vol. 11. Dordrecht: Springer, 2008
22. Ryan M, Farrar S. Using conjoint analysis to elicit preferences for health care. BMJ 2000; 320: 1530-3
23. Ryan M, Gerard K. Using discrete choice experiments to value health care programmes: current practice and future research reflections. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2003; 2 (1): 55-64
24. Ryan M, Hughes J. Using conjoint analysis to assess womens preferences for miscarriage management. Health Econ 1997; 6 (3): 261-73
25. McFadden D. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior [working paper]. Berkeley (CA): Institute of Urban & Regional Development, University of California, 1973: 199
26. Ben-Akiva ME, Lerman SR. Discrete choice analysis: theory and application to travel demand. MIT Press series in transportation studies. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press, 1985
27. Lancaster K. Consumer demand: a new approach. Columbia studies in economics. New York: Columbia University Press, 1971
28. Lancaster KJ. A new approach to consumer theory. Indianapolis (IN): Bobbs-Merrill, 1966
29. Hauber AB. Healthy-years equivalent: wounded but not yet dead. Exp Rev Pharmacoeconomics Outcomes Res 2009; 9 (3): 265-70
30. Telser H, editor. Nutzenmessung im Gesundheitswesen: die Methode der Discrete-Choice-Experimente. S.v. Forschungsergebnisse. Vol. 78. Hamburg: Kova, 2002
31. Lancsar E, Louviere J. Conducting discrete choice experiments to inform healthcare decision making: a users guide. Pharmacoeconomics 2008; 26 (8): 661-78
32. Lancsar E, Louviere J, Flynn T. Several methods to investigate relative attribute impact in stated preference experiments. Soc Sci Med 2007; 64 (8): 1738-53
33. Mühlbacher AC, Nübling M. Analysis of physicians perspective versus patients preferences: direct assessment and discrete choice experiments in therapy of multiple myeloma. Eur J Health Econ. Epub 2010 Jan 28
34. Mühlbacher AC, Rudolph I, Lincke HH, et al. Preferences for treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): a discrete choice experiment. BMC Health Serv Res 2009 Aug 13; 9: 149
35. Telser H, Becker K, Zweifel P. Validity and reliability of willingness-to-pay estimates: evidence from two overlapping discrete-choice- experiments. Patient 2008; 1 (4): 283-93
36. Mühlbacher AC, Lincke H-J, Nübling M. Evaluating patients preferences for multiple myeloma therapy, a discrete- choice-experiment. Psychosoc Med 2008; 5: Doc10
37. Johnson FR, Ozdemir S, Mansfield C, et al. Crohns disease patients risk-benefit preferences: serious adverse event risks versus treatment efficacy. Gastroenterology 2007; 133 (3): 769-79
38. Johnson FR, Hauber AB, Özdemir S. Using conjoint analysis to estimate healthy-year equivalents for acute conditions: an application to vasomotor symptoms. Value Health 2009; 12 (1): 146-52
39. Phillips KA, Johnson FR, Maddala T. Measuring what people value: a comparison of attitude and preference surveys. Health Serv Res 2002; 37 (6): 1659-79
40. Baumgartner H, Steenkamp J-B. Response styles in marketing research: a cross-national investigation. J Mark Res 2001; 38 (2): 143-56
41. Nübling M, Andersen HH, Mühlbacher A, et al. Computation of standard values for physical and mental health scale scores using the SOEP version of SF-12v2. Schmollers Jahrbuch 2007; 127 (1): 171-82
42. Flynn TN, Louviere JJ, Peters TJ, et al. Best-worst scaling: what it can do for health care research and how to do it. J Health Econ 2007; 26 (1): 171-89
43. Burgess L. Discrete choice experiments [computer software]. Sydney (NSW): Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Technology, 2007
44. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2001
45. Wasson JH, Johnson DJ, Benjamin R, et al. Patients report positive impacts of collaborative care. J Ambul Care Manage 2006; 29 (3): 199-206