The science of sex appeal: An evolutionary perspective

Review of General Psychology

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 240-250

  Gallup, Gordon G ^a   Frederick, David A ^b  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Body configuration; Body fat; Dishonest signals; Evolutionary psychology; Facial attractiveness; Menstrual cycle; Muscularity; Voice

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956495786     PISSN: 10892680     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0020451     Document Type: Article

References (103)

1. Apicella C.L., Feinberg D.R., Marlowe F.W. Voice pitch predicts reproductive success in male hunter-gatherers. BiologyLetters 2007, 3:682-684.
2. Arden R., Gottfredson L.S., Miller G., Pierce A. Intelligence and semen quality are positively correlated. Intelligence 2009, 37:277-282.
3. Armstrong N.R., Wilson J.D. Did the "Brazilian" kill the pubic louse?. Sexually Transmitted Infections 2006, 82:265-266.
4. Barash D.P. The whisperings within: Evolution and the origin of human nature 1979, Harper & Row, New York.
5. Barrett H.C., Kurzban R. Modularity in cognition: Framing the debate. Psychological Review 2006, 113:628-647.
6. Brewer G., Archer J., Manning J. Physical attractiveness: The objective ornament and subjective self-ratings. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology 2007, 5:29-38.
7. Campos P., Saguy A., Ernsberger P., Oliver E., Gaesser G. The epidemiology of overweight and obesity: Public health crisis or moral panic?. International Journal of Epidemiology 2006, 35:55-60.
8. Cashdan E. Waist-to-hip ratio across cultures: Trade-offs between androgen- and estrogen-dependent traits. Current Anthropology 2008, 49:1099-1107.
9. Cunningham M.R., Roberts A.R., Barbee A.P., Druen P.B., Wu C.-H. Their ideas of beauty are, on the whole, the same as ours: Consistency and variability in the cross-cultural perception of female physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1995, 68:261-279.
10. DeLamater J.D., Hyde J.S. Essentialism vs. social constructionism in the study of human sexuality. Journal of Sex Research 1998, 35:10-18.
11. Dijkstra P., Buunk B.P. Sex differences in the jealousy-evoking nature of a rival's body build. Evolution and Human Behavior 2001, 22:335-341.
12. Doty R.L., Ford M., Preti G., Huggins G.R. Changes in the intensity and pleasantness of human vaginal odors during the menstrual cycle. Science 1975, 190:1316-1318.
13. Dufour D.L., Sauther M. Comparative and evolutionary dimensions of the energetic of human pregnancy and lactation. American Journal of Human Biology 2002, 14:584-602.
14. Eibl-Eibesfeltd I. Love and hate: On the natural history of behavior patterns 1970, Methuen, New York.
15. Etcoff N. Survival of the prettiest: The science of beauty 1999, First Anchor, New York.
16. Feinberg D.R., Jones B.C., Little A.C., Burt D.M., Perrett D.I. Manipulations of fundamental and formant frequencies influence the attractiveness of human male voices. Animal Behaviour 2005, 69:561-568.
17. Falk D. Brain evolution in Homo: The "radiator" theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1990, 13:333-381.
18. Fessler D.M.T., Haley K.J. Guarding the perimeter: The outside-inside dichotomy in disgust and bodily experience. Cognition and Emotion 2006, 20:3-19.
19. Fink B., Neave N., Seydel H. Male facial appearance signals physical strength to women. American Journal of Human Biology 2007, 19:82-87.
20. Flegal K.M., Graubard B.I., Williamson D.F., Gail M.H. Excess deaths associated with underweight, overweight, and obesity. Journal of the American Medical Association 2005, 293:1861-1867.
21. Ford C.S., Beach F.A. Patterns of sexual behavior 1951, Harper & Row, New York.
22. Frederick D.A., Buchanan G.M., Sadeghi-Azar L., Peplau L.A., Haselton M.G., Berezovskaya A., Lipinski R.E. Desiring the muscular ideal: Men's body satisfaction in the United States, Ukraine, and Ghana. Psychology of Men & Masculinity 2007, 8:103-117.
23. Frederick D.A., Fessler D.M.T., Haselton M.G. Do representations of male muscularity differ in men's and women's magazines?. Body Image 2005, 2:81-86.
24. Frederick D.A., Forbes G.B., Grigorian K., Jarcho J.M. The UCLA Body Project I: Gender and ethnic differences in self-objectification and body satisfaction among 2,206 undergraduates. Sex Roles 2007, 57:317-327.
25. Frederick D.A., Haselton M.G. Why is muscularity sexy? Tests of the fitness indicator hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2007, 33:1167-1183.
26. Frederick D.A., Peplau L.A., Lever J. The Barbie mystique: Satisfaction with breast size and shape across the lifespan. International Journal of Sexual Health 2008, 20:200-211.
27. Frederick, D. A., Swami, V., & the 56 Members of the International Body Project. (2010, April). Preferences for muscularity in 26 countries across 10 world regions: Results from the International Body Project I. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Western Psychological Association, Cancun, Mexico.
28. Frisch R.E. Body fat, puberty and fertility. Biological Reviews 2008, 59:161-188.
29. Gallup A.C., White D.D., Gallup G.G. Handgrip strength predicts body morphology, aggression, and sexual behavior in males. Evolution and Human Behavior 2007, 28:423-429.
30. Gallup G.G. Permanent breast enlargement in human females: A sociobiological analysis. Journal of Human Evolution 1982, 11:597-601.
31. Gallup G.G., Cameron P.A. Modality specific metaphors: Is our mental machinery "colored" by a visual bias?. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 1992, 7:93-98.
32. Gallup G.G., Finn M.M., Sammis B. On the origin of descended scrotal testicles: The activation hypothesis. Evolutionary Psychology 2009, 7:517-526.
33. Gallup G.G., Frederick M.J., Pipitone R.N. Morphology and behavior: Phrenology revisited. Review of General Psychology 2008, 12:297-304.
34. Gangestad S.G., Haselton M.G., Buss D.M. Evolutionary foundations of cultural variation: Evoked culture and mate preferences. Psychological Inquiry 2006, 17:75-96.
35. Geher G. Accuracy and oversexualization in cross-sex mind-reading: An adaptationist approach. Evolutionary Psychology 2009, 7:331-347.
36. Grammer K., Thornhill R. Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection: The role of symmetry and averageness. Journal of Comparative Psychology 1994, 108:233-242.
37. Gulledge A.K., Gulledge M.H., Stahmann R.F. Romantic physical affection types and relationship satisfaction. The American Journal of Family Therapy 2003, 31:233-242.
38. Haselton M.G., Buss D.M., Oubaid V., Angleitner A. Sex, lies, and strategic interference: The psychology of deception between the sexes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2005, 31:3-23.
39. Haselton M.G., Gangestad S.W. Conditional expression of women's desires and men's mate guarding across the ovulatory cycle. Hormones and Behavior 2006, 49:509-518.
40. Haselton M.G., Mortezaie M., Pillsworth E.G., Bleske-Rechek A., Frederick D.A. Ovulatory shifts in human female ornamentation: Near ovulation, women dress to impress. Hormones and Behavior 2007, 51:40-45.
41. Henderson J.A., Anglin J.M. Facial attractiveness predicts longevity. Evolution and Human Behavior 2003, 24:351-356.
42. Hughes S.M., Dispenza F., Gallup G.G. Ratings of voice attractiveness predict sexual behavior and body configuration. Evolution and Human Behavior 2004, 25:295-304.
43. Hughes S.M., Gallup G.G. Sex differences in morphological predictors of sexual behavior: Shoulder to hip and waist to hip ratios. Human Behavior and Evolution 2003, 24:173-178.
44. Hughes S.M., Harrison M.A., Galllup G.G. Sex differences in romantic kissing among college students: An evolutionary perspective. Evolutionary Psychology 2007, 5:612-631.
45. Hughes S.M., Harrison M.A., Gallup G.G. The sound of symmetry: Voice as a marker of developmental instability. Evolution and Human Behavior 2002, 23:173-180.
46. Hughes S.M., Pastizzo M.J., Gallup G.G. The sound of symmetry revisited: Subjective and objective analyses of voice. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 2008, 32:93-108.
47. Jasienska G., Ziomkiewicz A., Ellison P.T., Lipson S.F., Thune I. Large breasts and narrow waists indicate high reproductive potential. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, Biological Sciences 2004, 271:1213-1217.
48. Jokela M. Physical attractiveness and reproductive success in humans: Evidence from the last 20th century United States. Evolution and Human Behavior 2009, 30:342-350.
49. Karremans J.C., Frankenhuis W.E., Arons S. Blind men prefer a low waist-to-hip ratio. Evolution and Human Behavior 2010, 31:182-186.
50. Kasperk C., Helmboldt A., Borcsok I., Heuthe S., Cloos O., Niethard F., Ziegler R. Skeletal site-dependent expression of the androgen receptor in human osteoblastic cell populations. Calcified Tissue 1997, 61:464-473.
51. Kirchengast S., Gartner M. Changes in fat distribution (WHR) and body weight across the menstrual cycle. Colleqium Antropoloqium 2002, 26:47-57.
52. Kruger D.J. Male financial consumption is associated with higher mating intentions and mating success. Evolutionary Psychology 2008, 6:603-612.
53. Langlois J.H., Kalakanis L., Rubenstein A.J., Larson A., Hallam M., Smoot M. Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin 2000, 126:390-423.
54. Lassek W.D., Gaulin S.J.C. Waist-hip ratio and cognitive ability: Is gluteofemoral fat a privileged store of neurodevelopmental resources. Evolution and Human Behavior 2008, 29:26-34.
55. Lassek W.D., Gaulin S.J.C. Costs and benefits of fat-free muscle mass in men: Relationship to mating success, dietary requirements, and native immunity. Evolution and Human Behavior 2009, 30:322-328.
56. Law-Smith M.J., Perrett D.I., Jones B.C., Cornwell R.E., Moore F.R., Feinberg D.R., Hillier S.G. Facial appearance is a cue to oestrogen levels in women. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 2006, 273:135-140.
57. Livshits G., Kobyliansky E. Fluctuating asymmetry as a possible measure of developmental homeostasis in humans: A review. Human Biology 1991, 63:441-466.
58. Manning J.T. Digit ratio: A pointer to fertility, behavior, and health 2002, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, N. J.
59. Manning J.T., Scutt D., Whitehouse G.H., Leinster S.J. Breast asymmetry and phenotypic quality in women. Evolution and Human Behavior 1997, 18:223-236.
60. Miller G., Tybur J.M., Jordan B.D. Ovulatory cycle effects on tip earnings by lap dancers: Economic evidence for human estrus. Evolution and Human Behavior 2007, 28:375-381.
61. Mortensen E.L., Michaelsen K.F., Sanders S.A., Reinisch J.M. The association between duration of breastfeeding and adult intelligence. The Journal of the American Medical Association 2002, 287:2365-2371.
62. Pagel M., Bodmer W. A naked ape would have fewer parasites. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: B 2003, 270:117-119.
63. Peplau L.A., Frederick D.A., Yee C.K., Maisel N., Lever J., Ghavami N. Body image satisfaction in heterosexual, gay, and lesbian adults. Archives of Sexual Behavior 2009, 38:713.
64. Perrett D.I., Burt D.M., Penton-Voak I.S., Lee K.J., Rowland D.A., Edwards R. Symmetry and human facial attractiveness. Evolution and Human Behavior 1999, 20:295-307.
65. Pillsworth E.G. Mate preferences among the Shuar of Ecuador: Trait rankings and peer evaluations. Evolution and Human Behavior 2008, 29:256-267.
66. Pillsworth E.G., Haselton M.G. Male sexual attractiveness predicts differential ovulatory shifts in female extra-pair attraction and male mate retention. Evolution and Human Behavior 2006, 27:247-258.
67. Pinker S. The blank slate: The modern denial of human nature 2002, Penguin, New York.
68. Pipitone R.N., Gallup G.G. Women's voice attractiveness varies across the menstrual cycle. Evolution and Human Behavior 2008, 29:268-274.
69. Platek S.M., Singh D. Optimal waist-to-hip ratios in women activate neural reward centers in men. PLoS ONE 2010, 5:e9042.
70. Puts D.A. Mating context and menstrual cycle phase affect women's preferences for male voice pitch. Evolution and Human Behavior 2005, 26:388-397.
71. Puts D.A. Beauty and the beast: Mechanisms of sexual selection in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior 2010, 31:157-175.
72. Ramsey J.L., Langlois J.H., Hoss R.A., Rubenstein A.J., Griffin A. Origins of a stereotype: Categorization of facial attractiveness by 6-month-old infants. Developmental Science 2004, 7:201-211.
73. Rhodes G. The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annual Review of Psychology 2006, 57:199-226.
74. Rigby N. Commentary: Counterpoint to Campos et al. International Journal of Epidemiology 2006, 35:79-80.
75. Roberts S.C., Little A.C., Gosling L.M., Perret D.I., Carter V., Jones B.C., Petrie M. MHC-herterozygosity and human facial attractiveness. Evolution and Human Behavior 2005, 26:213-216.
76. Rule N.O., Ambady N. The face of success: Inferences from chief excecutive officer's appearance predict company profits. Psychological Science 2008, 19:109-111.
77. Saxton T.K., Caryl P.G., Roberts S.C. Vocal and facial attractiveness judgements of children, adolescents and adults: The ontogeny of mate choice. Ethology 2006, 112:1179-1185.
78. Sell A., Bryant G.A., Cosmides L., Tooby J., Sznycer D., von Reuden C., Krauss A., Gurven M. Adaptations in humans for assessing physical strength from the voice. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 2010, doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.0769.
79. Sell A., Cosmides L., Tooby J., Sznycer D., von Rueden C., Gurven M. Human adaptations for the visual assessment of strength and fighting ability from the body and face. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 2009, 276:575-584.
80. Shoup M.L., Gallup G.G. Men's faces convey information about their bodies and their behavior: What you see is what you get. Evolutionary Psychology 2008, 6:469-479.
81. Singh D. Adaptive significance of female attractiveness: Role of waist-to-hip ratio. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1993, 65:293-307.
82. Singh D., Bronstad P.M. Female body odour is a potential cue to ovulation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 2001, 268:797-801.
83. Singh D., Dixson B.J., Jessop T.S., Morgan B., Dixson A.F. Cross-cultural consensus for waist-hip ratio and women's attractiveness. Evolution and Human Behavior 2010, 31:176-181.
84. Singh D., Singh D. Role of body fat and body shape on judgement of female health and attractiveness: An evolutionary perspective. Psychological Topics 2006, 2:331-350.
85. Soler C., Nunez M., Gutierrez R., Nunez J., Medina P., Sancho M., Nunez A. Facial attractiveness in men provides clues to semen quality. Evolution and Human Behavior 2003, 24:199-207.
86. Spitzer B.L., Henderson K.A., Zivian M.T. Gender differences in population versus media body sizes: A comparison over four decades. Sex Roles 1999, 40:545-565.
87. Sugiyama L.S. Physical attractiveness in adaptationist perspective. The handbook of evolutionary psychology 2005, 292-343. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ. D.M. Buss (Ed.).
88. Swami V., Frederick D.A., Aavik T., Alcalay L., Allik J., Anderson D., Zivcic-Becirevic I. Body weight ideals and body dissatisfaction in 26 countries across 10 world regions: Results of the International Body Project I. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2010, 36:309-325.
89. Swami V., Gray M., Furnham A. The female nude in Rubens: Disconfirmatory evidence of the waist-to-hip ratio hypothesis of female physical attractiveness. Imagination, Cognition, and Personality 2007, 26:139-147.
90. Swami V., Jones J., Einon D., Furnham A. Men's preference for women's profile waist-to-hip ratio, breast size, and ethnic group in Britain and South Africa. British Journal of Psychology 2009, 100:313-325.
91. Symons D. Beauty is in the adaptations of the beholder. Sexual nature, sexual culture 1995, 80-118. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. P.R. Abramson, S.D. Pinkerson (Eds.).
92. Thornhill R., Gangestad S.W. Facial attractiveness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 1999, 3:452-460.
93. Thornhill R., Gangestad S.W. Facial sexual dimorphism, developmental stability, and susceptibility to disease in men and women. Evolution and Human Behavior 2006, 27:131-144.
94. Thornhill R., Gangestad S.W. The evolutionary biology of human female sexuality 2008, Oxford University, New York.
95. Tovee M.J., Mason S.M., Emery J.L., McCluskey E.M., Cohen-Tovee E.M. Supermodels: Stick insects or hourglasses?. Lancet 1997, 350:1474-1475.
96. Tovee M.J., Swami V., Furnham A., Mangalparsad R. Changing perceptions of attractiveness as observers are exposed to a different culture. Evolution and Human Behavior 2006, 27:443-456.
97. Van Hoof M.H., Voorhorst F.J., Kaptein M.B., Hirasing R.A., Koppenaal C., Schoemaker J. Insulin, androgen, and gonadotropin concentration, body mass index, and waist-to-hip ratio in the first years after menarche in girls with regular menstrual cycle, irregular menstrual cycles, or oligomenorrhea. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 2000, 85:1394-1400.
98. Voracek M., Fisher M.L. Shapely centrefolds? Temporal change in body measures: Trend analysis. British Medical Journal 2002, 325:1447-1448.
99. Voracek M., Fisher M.L. Success is all in the measures: Androgenousness, curvaceousness, and starring frequencies in adult media actresses. Archives of Sexual Behavior 2006, 35:297-304.
100. Waas P., Waldenstrom V., Rossner S., Hellberg D. An adroid body fat distribution in females impairs the pregnancy rate of in-vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Human Reproduction 1997, 12:2057-2060.
101. Weeden J., Sabini J. Physical attractiveness and health in western societies: A review. Psychological Bulletin 2005, 131:635-653.
102. Zaadstra B.M., Seidell J.C., Van Noord P.A.H., Te Velde E.R., Habbema J.D.F., Vrieswijk B., Karbaat J. Fat and female fecundity: Prospective study of body fat distribution in conception rates. British Medical Journal 1993, 306:484-487.
103. Zebrowitz L.A., Hall J.A., Murphy N.A., Rhodes G. Looking smart and looking good: Facial cues to intelligence and their origins. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2002, 28:238-249.