Hemolysis by peripheral intravenous catheters: Materials comparison;Valutazione dell'emolisi agocannula dipendente: Comparazione di materiali

Rivista Italiana della Medicina di Laboratorio

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 216-221

  Giavarina, Davide ^a   Pasqualeb, L ^a   Mezzenaa, G ^a   Soffiatia, G ^a  

^a SAN BORTOLO HOSPITAL   (Italy)

Author keywords

Blood collection; Catheter materials; Haemolysis; Phlebotomist

Indexed keywords

BILIRUBIN; HEMOGLOBIN; TRIACYLGLYCEROL;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLOOD SAMPLING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; EMERGENCY WARD; FEMALE; HEMOLYSIS; HUMAN; INTRAVENOUS CATHETER; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; VEIN PUNCTURE;

EID: 77956486666     PISSN: 1825859X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Lippi G, Caputo M, Banfi G, Buttarello M, Ceriotti F, Daves M, et al. Raccomandazioni per il prelievo di sangue venoso. RIMeL/IJLaM 2008; 4:249-58.
2. Kennedy C, Angermuller S, King R, Noviello S, Walker J, Warden J, et al. A comparison of hemolysis rates using intravenous catheters versus venipuncture tubes for obtaining blood samples. J Emerg Nurs 1996; 22:566-9.
3. Grant MS. The effect of blood drawing techniques and equipment on the hemolysis of ED laboratory blood samples. J Emerg Nurs 2003; 29:116-21.
4. Lowe G, Stike R, Pollack M, Bosley J, O'Brien P, Hake A, et al. Nursing blood specimen collection techniques and hemolysis rates in an emergency department: analysis of venipuncture versus intravenous catheter collection techniques. J Emerg Nurs 2008; 34:26-32.
5. http://www.bd.com/infusion/products/ivcatheters/autoguard/ index.asp (data di consultazione: 3.06.2010).
6. http://www.bbraun.com/cps/rde/xchg/bbraun-com/ hs.xsl/products.html?id= 00020741510000000305&prid= PRID00000988 (data di consultazione: 3.06.2010).
7. http://www.terumo-europe.com/-hospi-pdf/surflo-wings.pdf (data di consultazione: 3 giugno 2010).
8. http://www.deltamedit.com/servizi/catalogoonline/catalogoonline-fase02. aspx?ID=18 (data di consultazione:3.06.2010).
9. Carraro P, Servidio G, Plebani M. Hemolysed specimens: a reason for rejection or a clinical challenge? Clin Chem 2000; 46:306-7.
10. Dugan L, Leech L, Speroni KG, Corriher J. Factors affecting hemolysis rates in blood sample drawn from newly placed IV sites in the emergency department. J Emerg Nurs 2005; 31:338-45. (Pubitemid 41213615)
11. Lippi G, Salvagno GL, Montagnana M, Poli G, Guidi GC. Influence of the needle bore size on platelet count and routine coagulation testing. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 2006; 17:557-61. (Pubitemid 44434967)
12. Lippi G, Salvagno GL, Montagnana M, Brocco G, Guidi GC. Influence of the needle bore size used for collecting venous blood samples on routine clinical chemistry testing. Clin Chem Lab Med 2006; 44:1009-14. (Pubitemid 44155873)
13. Cox SR, Dages JH, Jarjoura D, Hazelett S. Blood samples drawn from IV catheters have less hemolysis when 5-mL (vs 10-mL) collection tubes are used. J Emerg Nurs 2004; 30:529-33. (Pubitemid 39625262)
14. Halm MA, Gleaves M. Obtaining blood samples from peripheral intravenous catheters: best practice? Am J Crit Care 2009; 18:474-8.