Interactions of coronary artery smooth muscle cells with 3D porous polyurethane scaffolds

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A

Volumn 89, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 293-303

  Grenier, Stéphanie ^a   Sandig, Martin ^b   Holdsworth, David W ^a,c   Mequanint, Kibret ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^b WESTERN UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c ROBARTS RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Cell adhesion; Cell proliferation; Cell spreading; Polyurethane scaffold; Smooth muscle cell; Vascular grafts

Indexed keywords

3D SCAFFOLDS; CALDESMON; CELL MIGRATION; CELL NUMBER; CELL REPOPULATION; CELL SPREADING; CORONARY ARTERY SMOOTH MUSCLE CELLS; F-ACTIN; HUMAN CORONARY ARTERIES; INDIVIDUAL CELLS; INTERCONNECTED PORES; MARKER PROTEINS; MICRO CT; POLYURETHANE FILMS; POLYURETHANE SCAFFOLD; POLYURETHANE SCAFFOLDS; POROGENS; POROUS SCAFFOLD; SEM; SMOOTH MUSCLE CELL; SPHERICAL AGGREGATES; STRESS FIBERS; TISSUE REGENERATION; VASCULAR CELLS; VASCULAR GRAFTS; VASCULAR TISSUE ENGINEERING; VINCULIN;

ADHESION; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESES; CELL ADHESION; CELL MEMBRANES; CELL PROLIFERATION; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; GRAFTS; INTERCONNECTION NETWORKS; MUSCLE; STRUTS; THREE DIMENSIONAL; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

SCAFFOLDS;

CALDESMON; MATRIGEL; MOLECULAR SCAFFOLD; POLYURETHAN; VINCULIN; TISSUE SCAFFOLD;

ARTICLE; CELL ADHESION; CELL COUNT; CELL INTERACTION; CELL MIGRATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CORONARY ARTERY; FILM; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; MICRO-COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PHENOTYPE; POROSITY; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SMOOTH MUSCLE FIBER; SURFACE PROPERTY; VASCULAR SMOOTH MUSCLE; CELL CULTURE; CELL SHAPE; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CORONARY BLOOD VESSEL; CYTOLOGY; METABOLISM; TIME;

CELL COUNT; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SHAPE; CELLS, CULTURED; CORONARY VESSELS; HUMANS; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; MYOCYTES, SMOOTH MUSCLE; POLYURETHANES; POROSITY; TIME FACTORS; TISSUE SCAFFOLDS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 65549130018     PISSN: 15493296     EISSN: 15524965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.31972     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. American Heart Association. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics. Dallas, TX: American Heart Association; 2006.
2. Ghosh P, Unger F. Cardiac surgery and catheter-based coronary interventions in Europe in 2002. Cardiovascular forum online, European Heart Institute, Salzburg, Austria, 2004;1-19.
3. Eisenberg MJ, Filion KB, Azoulay A, Brox AC, Haider S, Pilote L. Outcomes and cost of coronary artery bypass graft surgery in the United States and Canada. Arch Intern Med 2005;165:1506-1513.
4. Yow KH, Ingram J, Korossis SA, Ingham E, Homer-Vanniasinkam S. Tissue engineering of vascular conduits. Br J Surg 2006;93:652-661.
5. Crombez M, Chevallier P, Gaudreault RC, Petitclerc E, Mantovani D, Laroche G. Improving arterial prosthesis neo-endothelialization: Application of a proactive VEGF construct onto PTFE surfaces. Biomaterials 2005;26:7402-7409.
6. Blanchemain N, Haulon S, Martel B, Traisnel M, Morcellet M, Hildebrand HF. Vascular PET prostheses surface modification with cyclodextrin coating: Development of a new drug delivery system. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2005;29:628-632.
7. Agarwal SC, Adams PC, Ahmed JM. Aneurysm of saphenous vein graft causing anterior myocardial infarction by possibly compressing left internal mammary artery. Int J Cardiol 2006;109:284-285.
8. Halabi AR, Alexander JH, Shaw LK, Lorenz TJ, Liao L, Kong DF, Milano CA, Harrington RA, Smith PK. Relation of early saphenous vein graft failure to outcomes following coronary artery bypass surgery. Am J Cardiol 2005;96:1254-1259.
9. Gusic RJ, Petko M, Myung R, William Gaynor J, Gooch KJ. Mechanical properties of native and ex vivo remodeled porcine saphenous veins. J Biomech 2005;38:1770-1779.
10. Higgins SP, Solan AK, Niklason LE. Effects of polyglycolic acid on porcine smooth muscle cell growth and differentiation. J Biomed Mater Res A 2003;67:295-302.
11. Williams C, Wick TM. Perfusion bioreactor for small diameter tissue-engineered arteries. Tissue Eng 2004;10:930-941.
12. Lau KK, Jones DP, Gaber O, Nezakatgoo N. Use of a "composite" vascular access graft in a young child on hemodialysis. Hemodial Int 2007;11:190-192.
13. Ratcliffe A. Tissue engineering of vascular grafts. Matrix Biol 2000;19:353-357.
14. Tiwari A, Salacinski HJ, Punshon G, Hamilton G, Seifalian AM. Development of a hybrid cardiovascular graft using a tissue engineering approach. Faseb J 2002;16:791-796.
15. Sarkar S, Schmitz-Rixen T, Hamilton G, Seifalian AM. Achieving the ideal properties for vascular bypass grafts using a tissue engineered approach: A review. Med Biol Eng Comput 2007;45:327-336.
16. Williamson MR, Black R, Kielty C. PCL-PU composite vascular scaffold production for vascular tissue engineering: Attachment, proliferation and bioactivity of human vascular endothelial cells. Biomaterials 2006;27:3608-3616.
17. Choi YJ, Noh I. Media tissue regeneration of the hybrid expanded polytetrafluoroethylene vascular graft via gelatin coating. Curr Appl Phys 2005;5:463-467.
18. Gulbins H, Pritisanac A, Dauner M, Petzold R, Goldemund A, Doser M, Meiser B, Reichart B. Seeding of human vascular cells onto small diameter polyurethane vascular grafts. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006;54:102-107.
19. Ishii Y, Kronengold RT, Virmani R, Rivera EA, Goldman SM, Prechtel EJ, Schuessler RB, Damiano RJ Jr. Novel bioengineered small caliber vascular graft with excellent one-month patency. Ann Thorac Surg 2007;83:517-525.
20. Fields C, Cassano A, Allen C, Meyer A, Pawlowski KJ, Bowlin GL, Rittgers SE, Szycher M. Endothelial cell seeding of a 4-mm I.D. polyurethane vascular graft. J Biomater Appl 2002;17:45-70.
21. Bezuidenhout D, Davies N, Zilla P. Effect of well defined dodecahedral porosity on inflammation and angiogenesis. Asaio J 2002;48:465-471.
22. Seifalian AM, Tiwari A, Hamilton G, Salacinski HJ. Improving the clinical patency of prosthetic vascular and coronary bypass grafts: The role of seeding and tissue engineering. Artif Organs 2002;26:307-320.
23. Daxini SC, Nichol JW, Sieminski AL, Smith G, Gooch KJ, Shastri VP. Micropatterned polymer surfaces improve retention of endothelial cells exposed to flow-induced shear stress. Biorheology 2006;43:45-55.
24. Hsu SH, Chuang SC, Chen CH, Chen DC. Endothelial cell attachment to the gamma irradiated small diameter polyurethane vascular grafts. Biomed Mater Eng 2006;16:397-404.
25. Grenier S, Sandig M, Mequanint K. Polyurethane biomaterials for fabricating 3D porous scaffolds and supporting vascular cells. J Biomed Mater Res A 2007;82:802-809.
26. Li X, Tsai P, Wieder ED, Kribben A, Van Putten V, Schrier RW, Nemenoff RA. Vascular smooth muscle cells grown on Matrigel. A model of the contractile phenotype with decreased activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase. J Biol Chem 1994;269:19653-19658.
27. Kleinman HK, Martin GR. Matrigel: Basement membrane matrix with biological activity. Semin Cancer Biol 2005;15:378-386.
28. Ferreira AM, McNeil CJ, Stallaert KM, Rogers KA, Sandig M. Interleukin-1beta reduces transcellular monocyte diapedesis and compromises endothelial adherens junction integrity. Microcirculation 2005;12:563-579.
29. Noh I, Choi YJ, Son Y, Kim CH, Hong SH, Hong CM, Shin IS, Park SN, Park BY. Diffusion of bioactive molecules through the walls of the medial tissue-engineered hybrid ePTFE grafts for applications in designs of vascular tissue regeneration. J Biomed Mater Res A 2006;79:943-953.
30. Yarlagadda PK, Chandrasekharan M, Shyan JY. Recent advances and current developments in tissue scaffolding. Biomed Mater Eng 2005;15:159-177.
31. Wang Z, Liu S, Guidoin R, Kodama M. Polyurethane vascular grafts with thorough porosity: Does an internal or an external membrane wrapping improve their in vivo blood compatibility and biofunctionality? Artif Cells Blood Substit Immobil Biotechnol 2004;32:463-484.
32. Contreras MA, Quist WC, Logerfo FW. Effect of porosity on small-diameter vascular graft healing. Microsurgery 2000;20:15-21.
33. Murphy WL, Dennis RG, Kileny JL, Mooney DJ. Salt fusion: An approach to improve pore interconnectivity within tissue engineering scaffolds. Tissue Eng 2002;8:43-52.
34. Banerjee S, Premchandran R, Tata M, John VT, McPherson GL, Akkara J, Kaplan D. Polymer precipitation using a micellar nonsolvent: The role of surfactant-polymer interactions and the development of a microencapsulation technique. Ind Eng Chem Res 1996;35:3100-3107.
35. Lin-Gibson S, Cooper JA, Landis FA, Cicerone MT. Systematic investigation of porogen size and content on scaffold morphometric parameters and properties. Biomacromolecules 2007;8:1511-1518.
36. Danielsson C, Ruault S, Simonet M, Neuenschwander P, Frey P. Polyesterurethane foam scaffold for smooth muscle cell tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2006;27:1410-1415.
37. Nasseri BA, Pomerantseva I, Kaazempur-Mofrad MR, Sutherland FW, Perry T, Ochoa E, Thompson CA, Mayer JE Jr, Oesterle SN, Vacanti JP. Dynamic rotational seeding and cell culture system for vascular tube formation. Tissue Eng 2003;9:291-299.
38. Soletti L, Nieponice A, Guan J, Stankus JJ, Wagner WR, Vorp DA. A seeding device for tissue engineered tubular structures. Biomaterials 2006;27:4863-4870.
39. Wendt D, Marsano A, Jakob M, Heberer M, Martin I. Oscillating perfusion of cell suspensions through three-dimensional scaffolds enhances cell seeding efficiency and uniformity. Biotechnol Bioeng 2003;84:205-214.
40. Perea H, Aigner J, Hopfner U, Wintermantel E. Direct magnetic tubular cell seeding: A novel approach for vascular tissue engineering. Cells Tissues Organs 2006;183:156-165.