Application of MPA to estimate probability of collapse of structures

Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics

Volumn 39, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 1259-1278

  Han, Sang Whan ^a   Moon, Ki Hoon ^a   Chopra, Anil K ^b  

^a Hanyang University   (South Korea)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Collapse capacity; Modal pushover analysis; Moment Resisting steel frames; Probability

Indexed keywords

DYNAMIC ANALYSIS; EARTHQUAKE RESISTANCE; EQUATIONS OF MOTION; METAL ANALYSIS; PROBABILITY; STEEL CONSTRUCTION; STRUCTURAL FRAMES; VIBRATION ANALYSIS;

APPROXIMATE PROCEDURES; COLLAPSE CAPACITY; COLLAPSE POTENTIAL; COLLAPSE STRENGTH; COMPUTATIONAL EFFORT; EMPIRICAL EQUATIONS; FRAGILITY CURVES; GROUND MOTIONS; HIGHER MODE; INCREMENTAL DYNAMIC ANALYSIS; MODAL PUSHOVER ANALYSIS; MOMENT-RESISTING STEEL FRAMES; SINGLE-DEGREE-OF-FREEDOM; STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS;

MODAL ANALYSIS;

COLLAPSE; DYNAMIC ANALYSIS; GROUND MOTION; PROBABILITY; VIBRATION;

EID: 77956472548     PISSN: 00988847     EISSN: 10969845     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.992     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Bernal D. Instability of buildings during seismic response. Engineering Structures 1998; 20(4-6):496-502.
2. Challa VRM, Hall JF. Earthquake collapse analysis of steel frames. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1994; 23(11):1199-1218.
3. Roeder C, Schneider SP, Carpenter JE. Seismic behavior of moment-resisting steel frames; analytical study. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 1993; 119(6):1867-1884.
4. Roeder C, Schneider SP, Carpenter JE. Seismic behavior of moment-resisting steel frames; experimental study. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 1993; 119(6):1885-1902.
5. Zareian F, Krawinkler H. Assessment of probability of collapse and design for collapse safety. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2007; 36(13):1901-1914.
6. Krawinkler H, Zareian F, Medina RA, Ibarra LF. Decision support for conceptual performance-based design. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2006; 35(1):115-133.
7. Liel AB, Haselton CB, Deierlein GG, Baker JW. Incorporating modeling uncertainties in the assessment of seismic risk of buildings. Structural Safety 2009; 31(2):197-211.
8. Goulet CA, Haselton CB, Mitrani-Reiser J, Beck JL, Deierlein GG, Porter KA, Stewart JP. Evaluation of the seismic performance of a code-conforming reinforced-concrete frame building-from seismic hazard to collapse safety and economic losses. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2007; 36(13):1973-1997.
9. Bernal D. Instability of buildings subjected to earthquakes. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 1992; 118(8):2239-2260.
10. Jennings PC, Husid R. Collapse of yielding structures during earthquakes. Journal of Engineering Mechanics Division (ASCE) 1968; 94(5):1045-1065.
11. Bernal D. Amplification factors for inelastic dynamic P-delta effects in earthquake analysis. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1987; 15(5):635-651.
12. Han SW, Kwon OS, Lee LH. Investigation of dynamic P-▶ effect on ductility factor. International Journal of Structural Engineering Mechanics 2001; 12(3):249-266.
13. Miranda E, Akkar S. Dynamic instability of simple structural systems. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 2003; 129(12):1722-1726.
14. Villaverde R. Methods to assess the seismic collapse capacity of building structures: state of the art. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 2007; 133(1):57-66.
15. Vamvatsikos D, Cornell CA. Incremental dynamic analysis. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2002; 31:491-514.
16. Vamvatsikos D, Cornell CA. Direct estimation of seismic demand and capacity of multidegree-of-freedom systems through incremental dynamic analysis of single degree of freedom approximation. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 2005; 131(4):589-599.
17. Vamvatsikos D, Cornell CA. Direct estimation of the seismic demand and capacity of oscillators with multi-linear static pushovers through IDA. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2006; 35(9):1097-1117.
18. Chopra AK, Goel RK. A modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands for buildings. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2002; 31:561-582.
19. Chopra AK. Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering (3rd edn). Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 20 Section 19.7.3.
20. Han SW, Chopra AK. Approximate incremental dynamic analysis using the modal pushover analysis procedure. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2006; 135:1853-1873.
21. Gupta A, Krawinkler H. Seismic demands for performance evaluation of steel moment resisting frame structures (SAC Task 5.4.3). Report No. 132, John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 1999.
22. Vamvatsikos D, Cornell CA. Applied incremental dynamic analysis. Earthquake Spectra 2004; 20:523-553.
23. Han SW, Wen YK. Methods of reliability-based seismic design II: calibration of code parameters. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 1997; 123(3):256-263.
24. Ibarra LF, Medina RA, Krawinkler H. Hysteretic models that incorporate strength and stiffness deterioration. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2005; 34(12):1489-1511.
25. ATC-63 Recommended methodology for quantification of building system performance and response parameters, Redwood City, CA, 2007
26. Chopra AK, Goel RK. Capacity-demand-diagram methods based on inelastic design spectrum. Earthquake Spectra 1999; 15(4):637-656.
27. Fajfar P, Fischinger M. N2-a method for nonlinear seismic analysis of regular structures. Proceedings of the 9th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Tokyo-Kyoto, Japan, vol. 5, 1988; 111-116.
28. Ruiz-Garći{dotless}a J, Miranda E. Performance-based assessment of existing structures accounting for residual displacement. Report No-153, John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 2005.