Specific impairments in visual processing following lesion side in hemianopic patients

Cortex

Volumn 46, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 1123-1131

  Cavézian, Céline ^a,b   Gaudry, Isabelle ^a,b   Perez, Céline ^a,b   Coubard, Olivier ^a,b   Doucet, Gaëlle ^c   Peyrin, Carole ^a   Marendaz, Christian ^a   Obadia, Mickaël ^b   Gout, Olivier ^b   Chokron, Sylvie ^a,b  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b FONDATION OPHTALMOLOGIQUE ADOLPHE DE ROTHSCHILD   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

Author keywords

Categorization; Detection; Hemianopia; Natural scenes; Spatial frequencies

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BRAIN DAMAGE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER; CONTROLLED STUDY; ERROR; HEMISPHERE; HOMONYMOUS HEMIANOPIA; HUMAN; RESPONSE TIME; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

AGED; BRAIN INJURIES; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HEMIANOPSIA; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; VISION, OCULAR; VISUAL FIELDS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 77956468656     PISSN: 00109452     EISSN: 00109452     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2009.08.013     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Basole A., Kreft-Kerekes V., White L.E., Fitzpatrick D. Cortical cartography revisited: A frequency perspective on the functional architecture of visual cortex. Progress in Brain Research 2006, 154:121-134.
2. Benton A., Tranel D. Visuoperceptual, visuospatial, and visuoconstructive disorders. Clinical Neuropsychology 1993, 165-213. 3rd ed. K.M. Heilman, E. Valenstein (Eds.).
3. Bowers J.S., Jones K.W. Detecting objects is easier than categorizing them. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2008, 61:552-557.
4. Bullier J. Integrated model of visual processing. Brain Research Review 2001, 36:96-107.
5. Chokron S., Perez C., Obadia M., Gaudry I., Laloum L., Gout O. From blindsight to sight: Cognitive rehabilitation of visual field defects. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience 2008, 26:305-320.
6. Fabre-Thorpe M., Richard G., Thorpe S.J. Rapid categorization of natural images by rhesus monkeys. NeuroReport 1998, 9:303-308.
7. Findlay J.M., Gilchrist I.D. Visual orienting. Active Vision: The Psychology of Looking and Seeing 2003, 55-81. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
8. Fink G.R., Halligan P.W., Marshall J.C., Frith C.D., Frackowiak R.S., Dolan R.J. Where in the brain does visual attention select the forest and the trees?. Nature 1996, 382:626-628.
9. Fink G.R., Marshall J.C., Halligan P.W., Frith C.D., Frackowiak R.S., Dolan R.J. Hemispheric specialization for global and local processing: The effect of stimulus category. Proceedings in Biological Sciences 1997, 264:487-494.
10. Fink R., Marshall J.C., Halligan P.W., Dolan R.J. Neuronal activity in early visual areas during global and local processing: A comment on Heinze, Hinrichs, Scholz, Burchert and Mnagun. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2000, 12:355-356.
11. Ginsburg A.P. Spatial filtering and visual form perception. Handbook of Perception and Human Performance 1986, 1-41. Wiley, New York. K. Boff, L. Kaumann, J. Thomas (Eds.).
12. Grabowska A., Nowicka A., Szatkowska I. Asymmetry in visual evoked potentials to gratings registered in the two hemispheres of the human brain. Acta Neurobiologicae Experimentalis 1992, 52:239-249.
13. Grill-Spector K., Kanwisher N. Visual recognition: As soon as you know it is there, you know what it is. Psychological Science 2005, 16:152-160.
14. Guyader N., Chauvin A., Peyrin C., Hérault J., Marendaz C. Image phase or amplitude? Rapid scene categorization is an amplitude based process. Comptes Rendus Biologie 2004, 327:313-318.
15. Heinze H.J., Hinrichs H., Scholz M., Burchert W., Mangun G.R. Neural mechanisms of global and local processing. A combined PET and ERP study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1998, 10:485-498.
16. Hirvela H., Koskela P., Laatikainen L. Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity in the elderly. Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica 1995, 73:111-115.
17. Hughes H.C., Nozawa G., Kitterle F. Global precedence, spatial frequency channels, and the statistics of natural images. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1996, 8:197-230.
18. Jonsson J., Helige J. Lateralized effects of blurring: A test of the visual spatial frequency model of cerebral hemisphere asymmetry. Neuropsychologia 1986, 24:351-362.
19. Kerkhoff G. Neurovisual rehabilitation: Recent developments and future directions. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 2000, 68:691-706.
20. Kitterle F., Christman S., Hellge J.B. Hemispheric differences are found in the identification, but not in the detection task, of low versus high spatial frequencies. Perception Psychophysics 1990, 48:297-306.
21. Leff A.P., Spitsyna G., Plant G.T., Wise R.J. Structural anatomy of pure and hemianopic alexia. Journal Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 2006, 77:1004-1007.
22. Mack M.L., Gauthier I., Sadr J., Palmeri T.J. Object detection and basic-level categorization: Sometimes you know it is there before you know what it is. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2008, 15:28-35.
23. Oliva C., Schyns P. Coarse bolds or fine edges? Evidence that information diagnosticity changes the perception of complex visual stimuli. Cognitive Psychology 1997, 34:72-107.
24. Paramei G.V., Sabel B.A. Contour-integration deficits on the intact side of the visual field in hemianopia patients. Behavioural Brain Research 2008, 188:109-124.
25. Peyrin C., Chauvin A., Chokron S., Marendaz C. Hemispheric specialisation for spatial frequency processing in the analysis of natural scenes. Brain and Cognition 2003, 53:278-282.
26. Peyrin C., Baciu M., Segebarth C., Marendaz C. Cerebral regions and hemispheric specialization for processing spatial frequencies during natural scene recognition. An event-related fMRI study. NeuroImage 2004, 23:698-707.
27. Peyrin C., Mermillod M., Chokron S., Marendaz C. Effect of temporal constraints on hemispheric asymmetries during spatial frequency processing. Brain and Cognition 2006, 62:214-220.
28. Peyrin C., Chokron S., Guyader N., Gout O., Moret J., Marendaz C. Neural correlates of spatial frequency processing: A neuropsychological approach. Brain Research 2006, 1073-1074:1-10.
29. Rebaï M., Bernard C., Lannou J., Jouen F. Spatial frequency and right hemisphere: An electrophysiological investigation. Brain Cognition 1998, 36:21-29.
30. Robertson L.C., Lamb M.R., Knight R.T. Effects of lesions of temporal-parietal junction on perceptual and attentional processing. Journal of Neuroscience 1988, 8:3757-3769.
31. Schyns P.G., Oliva A. From blobs to boundary edges: Evidence for time- and spatial-scale-dependant scene recognition. American Psychological Society 1994, 54:195-200.
32. Sergent J. The cerebral balance of power: Confrontation or cooperation?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1982, 8:253-272.
33. Stoerig P. Blindsight, conscious vision, and the role of the primary visual cortex. Progress in Brain Research 2006, 155:217-234.
34. Stoerig P., Zontanou A., Cowey A. Aware or unaware: Assessment of cortical blindness in four men and a monkey. Cerebral Cortex 2002, 12:565-574.
35. Tant M.L.M., Brouwer W.H., Cornelissen F.W., Kooijman A.C. Driving and visuospatial performance in people with hemianopia. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 2002, 12:419-437.
36. Van Essen D.C., DeYoe E.A. Concurrent processing in the primate visual cortex. The Cognitive Neurosciences 1995, 383-400. MIT Press, Cambrige, MA. M.S. Gazzaniga (Ed.).
37. Wilkinson D.T., Hallligan P.W., Marshall J.C., Büchel C., Dolan R.J. Switching between the forest and the trees: Brain systems involved in local/global changed-level judgments. NeuroImage 2001, 13:56-67.
38. Yamaguchi S., Yamagata S., Kobayashi S. Cerebral asymmetry of the " top-down" allocation of attention tp global and local features. Journal of Neuroscience 2000, 20:RC72.