Factors affecting agreement between participant and collateral reports of participant drug use among college students

Addictive Disorders and their Treatment

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 123-134

  Hagman, Brett T ^a   Cohn, Amy M ^a   Noel, Nora E ^b  

^a The State University of New Jersey   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA WILMINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

collaterals; college students; drug use; self report; validity

Indexed keywords

AMPHETAMINE; BARBITURIC ACID DERIVATIVE; BENZODIAZEPINE; CANNABIS; COCAINE; DIAMORPHINE; OPIATE; PSYCHEDELIC AGENT; TRANQUILIZER;

ADULT; ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION; ARTICLE; COLLEGE STUDENT; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DATA ANALYSIS; DRINKING BEHAVIOR; DRUG USE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INHALANT ABUSE; MALE; PARTICIPANT OBSERVATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SELF REPORT; SOCIAL ATTITUDE;

EID: 77956450396     PISSN: 15315754     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ADT.0b013e3181e5c21e     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. College enrollment status and past year illicit drug use among young adults: 2002, 2003, 2004. National Survey of Drug Use and Health. Available online www.oas.samsha.gov/2k5/College/ college.pdf, 2005.
2. Gillespie W, Holt JL, Blackwell RL. Measuring outcomes of alcohol, marijuana, and cocaine use among college students: a preliminary test of the shortened inventory of problems-alcohol and drugs (SIP-AD). J Drug Issues. 2007;37:549-568.
3. Martens MP, Brown NT, Donovan BM, et al. Measuring negative consequences of college student substance use: a psychometric evaluation of the core alcohol and drug survey. Measur Eval Coun Develop. 2005;28:164-175.
4. Hagman BT, Clifford PR, Noel NE, et al. The utility of collateral informants in substance use research involving college students. Addict Behav. 2007;32: 2317-2323.
5. Laforge RG, Borsari B, Baer JS. The utility of collateral informant assessment in college alcohol research: results from a longitudinal prevention trial. J Stud Alcohol. 2005;66:479-487.
6. Maisto SA, McKay JR, Connors GJ. Self-report issues in substance abuse: State of the art and future directions. Behav Assess. 1990;12:117-134.
7. Babor TF, Stephens RS, Marlatt GA. Verbal report methods in clinical research on alcoholism: response bias and its victimization. J Stud Alc. 1987; 48:410-424.
8. Connors CJ, Maisto SA. Drinking reports from collateral individuals. Addict. 2003;98(suppl. 2):21-29.
9. Del Boca FK, Darkes J. The validity of self-reports of alcohol consumption: state of the science and challenges for research. Addict. 2003;98(suppl. 3):1-12.
10. Neumann T, Spies C. Use of biomarkers for alcohol use disorders in clinical practice. Addict. 2003;98 (suppl. 2):81-91.
11. Sobell LC, Sobell MB. Timeline Follow-Back: a technique for assessing self-reported alcohol consumption. In: Litten RZ, Allen J, eds. Measuring Alcohol Consumption: Psychosocial and Biological Methods. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 1992:41-72.
12. Walker S, Cosden M. Reliability of college student self-reported drinking behavior. J Sub Abuse Treat. 2007;33:405-409.
13. Borsari B, Muullerleile P. Collateral reports in the college setting: a meta-analytic integration. Alc Clin Exper Research. 2009;33:826-838.
14. Baer JS, Kivlahan DR, Blume AW, et al. Brief intervention for heavy-drinking college students: 4-year follow-up and natural history. Am J Pub Health. 2001;91:1310-1316.
15. Larimer ME, Cronce JM, Lee CM, et al. Brief intervention in college settings. Alc Res Health. 2004;28: 94-104.
16. Borsari B, Carey KB. Two brief alcohol interventions for mandated college students. Psychol Addict Behav. 2005;19:296-302.
17. Curtin L, Stephens RS, Bonenberger JL. Goal setting and feedback in the reduction of heavy drinking in female college students. J Coll Student Psychother. 2001;15:17-37.
18. Marlatt GA, Baer JS, Kivlahan DR, et al. Screening and brief intervention for high-risk college student drinkers: results from a 2-year follow-up assessment. J Cons Clin Psycho. 1998;66:604-615.
19. Stacy AW, Widaman KF, Hays R, et al. Validity of selfreports of alcohol and other drug use: a multi-trait multi-method assessment. J Person Social Psychol. 1985;49:219-232.
20. Stasiewicz PR, Vincent PC, Bradizza CM, et al. Factors affecting agreement between severely mentally ill alcohol abusers' and collaterals' reports of alcohol and other substance use. Psychol Addict Behav. 2008;22:78-87.
21. Sharabany R. Intimate friendship scale: conceptual underpinnings, psychometric properties and construct validity. J Soc Person Relat. 1994;11:449-469.
22. Koch G. "Intraclass correlation coefficient". In: Kotz S, Johnson NL. Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences. 4th ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1982: 213-217.
23. Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res. 1999;8:135-160.
24. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;346:307-310.
25. Yi Q, Wang PP, He Y. Reliability analysis for continuous measurement: equivalence test for agreement. Stat Med. 2008;27:2816-2825.
26. Andersson SW, Niklasson A, Lapidus L, et al. Poor agreement between self-reported birth weights from original records in adult women. Am J Epidem. 2000; 152:609-615.
27. Cahan C, Decker MJ, Hoekje PL, et al. Agreement between noninvasive oximetric values for oxygen saturation. Chest. 1990;97:814-819.
28. Cohen J, Cohen P. Applied Multiple Regression/ Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1983.
29. Jaccard J, Turrisi R. Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression. Newbury Park: Sage; 2002.
30. Wetherill R, Fromme K. The effects of perceived awareness and caring, family motives and social motives on alcohol use by high school and first semester college students. Psychol Addict Behav. 2007;21:147-154.