Reliability analysis for continuous measurements: Equivalence test for agreement

Statistics in Medicine

Volumn 27, Issue 15, 2008, Pages 2816-2825

  Yi, Qilong ^a,b   Wang, P Peter ^c,d   He, Yaohua ^e  

^a CANADIAN BLOOD SERVICES   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^c TIANJIN MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^d MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY OF NEWFOUNDLAND   (Canada)

^e UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK   (Canada)

Author keywords

Agreement; Equivalence test; Reliability

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; CALCULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DESCRIPTIVE RESEARCH; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; INTRARATER RELIABILITY; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; POWER ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY; SAMPLE SIZE; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE;

HUMANS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; OBSERVER VARIATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 47249098484     PISSN: 02776715     EISSN: 10970258     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sim.3110     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. White SA, Van den Broek NR. Methods for assessing reliability and validity for a measurement tool: a case study and critique using the WHO haemoglobin colour scale. Statistics in Medicine 2004; 23:1603-1619.
2. Rousson V, Gasser T, Seifert B. Assessing interrater and test-retest reliability of continuous measurements. Statistics in Medicine 2002; 21:3431-3446.
3. Lin L. A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics 1989; 45:255-268.
4. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurements. The Lancet 1986; 1:307-310.
5. Bland JM, Altman DG. A note on the use of the intraclass correlation coefficient in the evaluation of agreement between two methods of measurement. Computers in Biology and Medicine 1990; 20(5):337-340.
6. Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Statistical Methods in Medical Research 1999; 8:135-160.
7. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlation: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin 1979; 86(2):420-428.
8. Lee J, Koh D, Ong CN. Statistical evaluation of agreement between two methods for measuring a quantitative variable. Computers in Biology and Medicine 1989; 19:61-70.
9. Müller R, Büttner P. A critical discussion of intraclass correlation coefficients. Statistics in Medicine 1994; 13: 2465-2476.
10. Donner A, Eliasziw M. Sample size requirements for reliability studies. Statistics in Medicine 1987; 6:441-448.
11. Walter SD, Eliasziw M, Donner A. Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies. Statistics in Medicine 1998; 17:101-110.