Assessing recycled/secondary materials as pavement bases

Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Ground Improvement

Volumn 163, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 3-12

  Saride, Sireesh ^a   Puppala, Anand J ^a   Williammee, Richard ^b  

^a University of Texas at Arlington   (United States)

^b Texas Department of Transportation   (United States)

Author keywords

Pavement design; Recycling and reuse of materials; Sustainability

Indexed keywords

BASE MATERIAL; CONSERVATION OF ENERGY; CONVENTIONAL MATERIALS; FIELD MONITORING; LABORATORY STUDIES; LIFECYCLE COSTS; LONG TERM PERFORMANCE; PAVEMENT BASE MATERIALS; PAVEMENT CONSTRUCTION; PAVEMENT DESIGN; PAVEMENT SURFACE; PRESSURE CELL; RECLAIMED ASPHALT PAVEMENTS; RECYCLED MATERIALS; RESILIENT MODULUS TESTS; SECONDARY MATERIALS; SUSTAINABILITY; SUSTAINABILITY ISSUES; TEST SECTIONS; TEXAS , USA;

ASPHALT PAVEMENTS; CONSERVATION; MATERIALS; PAVEMENT OVERLAYS; RECYCLING; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

ROADS AND STREETS;

ASPHALT; COMPRESSIBILITY; DESIGN; PAVEMENT; RECYCLING; RESILIENCE; SUSTAINABILITY;

TEXAS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 77956439978     PISSN: 17550750     EISSN: 17550769     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1680/grim.2010.163.1.3     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Abreu DG, Jefferson I, Braithwaite PA and Chapman DN (2008) Why sustainability is important in geotechnical engineering. In Geo Congress 2008: Geosustainability and Geohazard Mitigation (Khire MV, Reddy KR and Alshawabkeh AN (eds)). American Society for Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, USA, Geotechnical Special Publication 178, pp. 821-828.
2. Alkins AE, Lane B and Kazmierowski T (2008) Sustainable pavements - environmental, economic, and social benefits of in-situ pavement recycling. Transportation Research Record 2084: 100-103.
3. AASHTO (American Association of State Highway Transportation Officials) (1993) AASHTO Guide for Design of Pavement Structures. AASHTO, Washington, DC, USA.
4. AASHTO (2003) AASHTO T 307-99: Standard Method of Test for Determining the Resilient Modulus of Soils and Aggregate Materials. AASHTO, Washington, DC, USA.
5. ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials) (2004) ASTM D2435: Standard Test Methods for One-Dimensional Consolidation Properties of Soils Using Incremental Loading. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA.
6. ASTM (2005) ASTM D4318: Standard Test Methods for Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, and Plasticity Index of Soils. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA.
7. ASTM (2006) ASTM D2166: Standard Test Method for Unconfined Compressive Strength of Cohesive Soil. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA.
8. ASTM (2008) ASTM D4546: Standard Test Methods for One- Dimensional Swell or Settlement Potential of Cohesive Soils. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA.
9. Chesner WH, Simon MJ and Eighmy TT (2001) Recent federal initiatives for recycled material use in highway construction in the United States. In Beneficial Use of Recycled Materials in Transportation Applications - Arlington Virginia, November 13-15, 2001 (Eighmy TT (ed.)). Air and Waste Management Association, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, pp. 3-10.
10. Collins RJ and Ciesielski SK (1994) Recycling and use of waste materials and by-products in highway construction. In Synthesis of Highway Practice 199. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 1-77.
11. Das SC, Bakeer R, Zhong J and Schutt M (1990) Assessment of Mitigation Embankment Settlement with Pile Supported Approach Slabs. Louisiana Transportation and Research Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.
12. Eades JL and Grim RE (1966) A quick test to determine lime requirements for lime stabilization. Highway Research Record 139: 61-72.
13. Ellis SJ (2003) Recycling in transportation. In Transportation Geotechnics (Frost MW, Jefferson I, Faragher E, Roff TEJ and Fleming PR (eds)). Thomas Telford, London, pp. 177-188.
14. Fleming PR, Rogers CDF, Thom NH and Frost MW (2003) A performance specification for pavement foundations. In Transportation Geotechnics (Frost MW, Jefferson I, Faragher E, Roff TEJ and Fleming PR (eds)). Thomas Telford, London, pp. 161-176.
15. Fraser J and McBride RA (2002) The utility of aggregate processing fines in the rehabilitation of dolomite quarries. Land Degradation and Development 11: 1-17.
16. Harbottle MJ, Tabbaa AA and Evans CW (2008) Sustainability of land remediation. Part I: overall analysis. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, Geotechnical Engineering 161(2): 75-92.
17. Horvath A (2003) Life-cycle Environmental and Economic Assessment of Using Recycled Materials in Asphalt Pavements. University of California Transportation Center, Berkeley, CA, USA, Technical Report, p. 29.
18. Huffman M (2001) Limestone pond fines case study: subtitle D landfill soil infiltration layer and other applications. Proceedings ICAR 9th Annual Symposium, Austin TX, USA, p. 15 (CD-ROM).
19. James RW, Zhang H and Zollinger DG (1991) Observations of severe abutment back wall damage. Transportation Research Record 1319: 55-61.
20. Janoo VC (1994) Layer Coefficients for NHDOT Pavement Material. Prepared for New Hampshire Department of Transportation and US Department of Transportation, Special Report 94-30.
21. Jefferis SA (2008) Moving towards sustainability in geotechnical engineering. In Geo Congress 2008: Geosustainability and Geohazard Mitigation (Khire MV, Reddy KR and Alshawabkeh AN (eds)). American Society for Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, USA, Geotechnical Special Publication 178, pp. 844-851.
22. Jefferson I, Hunt DVL, Birchall CA and Rogers CDF (2007) Sustainability indicators for environmental geotechnics. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, Engineering Sustainability 160(2): 57-78.
23. Kumar DS and Hudson WR (1993) Potential uses for quarry fines. Stone Review 9(2): 12-14.
24. Lambert P, Fleming PR and Frost MW (2006) Material testing for sustainable pavement foundation design. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, Construction Materials 159(4): 139-146.
25. Lee MT and Nicholson PG (1997) An engineering test program of MSW ash mixed with quarry tailings for use as a construction material. In Testing of Soil Mixed with Waste or Recycled Materials (Wasemiller MA and Hoddinott KB (eds)). American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA, USA, ASTM STP 1275, pp. 205-218.
26. Manning D (2004) Exploration and use of quarry fines. In Mineral Solutions. Manchester Institute of Science and Technology, Manchester, Report No. 087/MIST2/DACM/01, MIST project reference: MA/2/4/003.
27. Naik TR and Kumar R (2003) Use of Limestone Quarry Byproducts for Developing Economical Self-compacting Concrete. UWM Center for By-Products Utilization, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee, WI, USA, Report No. CBU-2003-15.
28. NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) (2008) See http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/ncdc.html (accessed 10/10/2008).
29. Nunes M, Bridges M and Dawson A (1996) Assessment of secondary materials for pavement construction: Technical and environmental aspects. Waste Management 16(1-3): 87-96.
30. Okamura H (1997) Self-compacting high performance concrete. ACI Concrete International 19(7): 50-54.
31. Puppala AJ, Griffin JA, Hoyos LR and Chomtid S (2004) Studies on sulfate-resistant cement stabilization methods to address sulfate-induced soil heave. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE 130(4): 391-402.
32. Puppala AJ, Saride S, Potturi A and Hoyos LR (2009) Resilient behavior of cement-fiber treated reclaimed asphalt pavement (rap) aggregates as bases. In Contemporary Topics in Ground Modification, Problem Soils, and Geo-Support (Hussein MH, Iskander MG and Laefer DF (eds)). American Society for Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, USA, Geotechnical Special Publication 187, pp. 433-440.
33. Reid MJ and Chandler JWE (2001) Recycling in Transportation Infrastructure. TRL Limited, Crowthorne.
34. Sirivitmaitrie C (2008) Novel Stabilization Methods for Sulfate and Non-sulfate Soils. PhD thesis, The University of Texas at Arlington, 294 pp.
35. Soosan TG, Jose BT and Abraham BM (2001) Use of quarry dust in embankment and highway construction. In Proceedings of Indian Geo-Technical Conference, Indore. New Phoenix, New Delhi, India, pp. 274-277.
36. Taha R, Ali G, Basma A and Al-Turk O (1999) Evaluation of reclaimed asphalt pavement aggregate in road bases and sub bases. In Proceedings of 7th International Conference on Low-volume Roads. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 264-269 and Transportation Research Record 1652: 1.
37. Taha R, Ali A, Khalid A and Muamer A (2002) Cement stabilization of reclaimed asphalt pavement aggregates for road bases and subbases. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering 14(3): 239-245.
38. Tao M, Zhang Z and Wu Z (2008) Simple procedure to assess performance and cost benefits of using recycled materials in pavement construction. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, ASCE 20(11): 718-725.
39. Tarun RN, Rudolph NK, Chun YM, Fethullah C and Bruce WR (2005) Use of fly ash and limestone quarry by-products for developing economical self-compacting concrete. Proceedings of the International Congress on Fly Ash Utilization, New Delhi, India, 4-7 December.
40. Tepordei VV (1992) Construction Sand and Gravel. Annual Report 1990. US Department of Interior, Bureau of Mines, Washington, DC, USA.
41. TxDOT (Texas Department of Transportation) (1999) Tex- 124-E: Test Procedure for Determining Potential Vertical Rise. TxDOT, Austin, TX, USA, Designation: Tex-124-E, p. 11.
42. TxDOT (2008) Tex-1001-S: Test Procedure for Operating Internal Profilers and Evaluating Pavement Profiles. TxDOT, Austin, TX, USA, Designation: Tex-1001-S. p. 17.
43. Zoorob SE and Suparma LB (2000) Laboratory design and investigation of the properties of continuously graded asphaltic concrete containing recycled plastics aggregate replacement (Plastiphalt). Cement and Concrete Composites 22(2): 233-242.