Biomechanical response of a mandible in a patient affected with hemifacial microsomia before and after distraction osteogenesis

Medical Engineering and Physics

Volumn 32, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 860-866

  Reina Romo, E ^a   Sampietro Fuentes, A ^b   Gomez Benito M J ^b,c   Dominguez J ^a   Doblare M ^b,c   Garcia Aznar J M ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SEVILLE   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZARAGOZA   (Spain)

^c BIOMATERIALES Y NANOMEDICINA CIBER BBN   (Spain)

Author keywords

Biomechanics; Distraction osteogenesis; Finite element analysis; Hemifacial microsomia

Indexed keywords

BEFORE AND AFTER; BIOMECHANICAL BEHAVIOR; BIOMECHANICAL RESPONSE; DISPLACEMENT FIELD; DISTRACTION OSTEOGENESIS; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HEMIFACIAL MICROSOMIA; NORMAL FUNCTION; PATIENT SPECIFIC; REACTION FORCES;

BIOMECHANICS;

FINITE ELEMENT METHOD;

ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CASE REPORT; CHILD; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISTRACTION OSTEOGENESIS; GEOMETRY; HEMIFACIAL MICROSOMIA; HUMAN; MALE; MANDIBLE CONDYLE; MASTICATION; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREDICTION; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

BIOMECHANICS; BITE FORCE; CHILD; FACIAL ASYMMETRY; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; MALE; MANDIBLE; MANDIBULAR CONDYLE; MODELS, ANATOMIC; OSTEOGENESIS, DISTRACTION;

EID: 77956418144     PISSN: 13504533     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2010.05.012     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. McCarthy J.G., Schreiber J., Karp N., Thorne C.H., Grayson B.H. Lengthening the human mandible by gradual distraction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992, 89:1-8.
2. Dictionary.com. The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English language, fourth ed.; 2010. arch. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/branchial.
3. Gorlin R.J., Cohen M.M.J., Levin L.S. Syndromes of the head and neck 1990, Oxford University Press, New York.
4. Loboa E.G., Fang T.D., Parker D.W., Warren S.M., Fong K.D., Longaker M.T., et al. Mechanobiology of mandibular distraction osteogenesis: finite element analyses with a rat model. J Orthop Res 2005, 23:663-670.
5. Carter D.R., Beaupré G.S., Giori N.J., Helms J.A. Mechanobiology of skeletal regeneration. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998, 355S:S41-S55.
6. Idelsohn S., Planell J.A., Gil F.J., Lacroix D. Development of a dynamic mechano-regulation model based on shear strain and fluid flow to optimize distraction osteogenesis. J Biomech 2006, 39S:S1-S684.
7. Isaksson H., Comas O., Van Donkelaar C.C., Mediavilla J., Wilson W., Huiskes R., et al. Bone regeneration during distraction osteogenesis: mechano-regulation by shear strain and fluid velocity. J Biomech 2007, 40:2002-2011.
8. Reina-Romo E., Gómez-Benito M.J., García-Aznar J.M., Domínguez J., Doblaré M. Modeling distraction osteogenesis: analysis of the distraction rate. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 2009, 8:323-335.
9. Reina-Romo E., Gómez-Benito M.J., García-Aznar J.M., Domínguez J., Doblaré M. Growth mixture model of distraction osteogenesis: effect of pre-traction stresses. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 2010, 9:103-115.
10. Reina-Romo E, Gómez-Benito MJ, García-Aznar JM, Domínguez J, Doblaré M. An interspecies computational study on limb lengthening. Proc Inst Mech Eng H, in press, doi:10.1243/09544119JEIM787.
11. Kofod T., Cattaneo P.M., Melsen B. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the mandible and temporomandibular joint on simulated occlusal forces before and after vertical ramus elongation by distraction osteogenesis. J Craniofac Surg 2005, 16:421-429.
12. Cattaneo P.M., Kofod T., Dalstra M., Melsen B. Using the finite element method to model the biomechanics of the asymmetric mandible before, during and after skeletal correction by distraction osteogenesis. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 2005, 8:157-165.
13. Boccaccio A., Lamberti L., Pappalettere C., Carano A., Cozzani M. Mechanical behavior of an osteotomized mandible with distraction orthodontic devices. J Biomech 2006, 39:2907-2918.
14. Boccaccio A., Prendergast P., Pappalettere C., Kelly D. Tissue differentiation and bone regeneration in an osteotomized mandible: a computational analysis of the latency period. Med Biol Eng Comput 2008, 46:283-298.
15. Korioth T., Romilly D., Hannam A. Three-dimensional finite element stress analysis of the dentate human mandible. Am J Phys Anthropol 1992, 88:69-96.
16. Weijs W.A., Hillen B. Relationship between the physiological cross-section of the human jaw muscles and their cross-sectional area in computer tomograms. Acta Anat 1984, 118:129-138.
17. Reina J., García-Aznar J., Domínguez J., Doblaré M. Numerical estimation of bone density and elastic constants distribution in a human mandible. J Biomech 2007, 40:828-836.
18. Takashima M., Kitai N., Murakami S., Furukawa S., Kreiborg S., Takada K. Volume and shape of masticatory muscles in patients with hemifacial microsomia. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2003, 40:6-12.
19. Kane A.A., Lo L.J., Christensen G.E., Vannier M.W., Marsh J.L. Relationship between bone and muscles of mastication in hemifacial microsomia. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997, 99:990-997.
20. Marsh J.L., Baca D., Vannier M.W. Facial musculoskeletal asymmetry in hemifacial microsomia. Cleft Palate J 1989, 26:292-302.
21. Rubin C.T., Lanyon L.E. Dynamic strain similarity in vertebrates; an alternative to allometric limb bone scaling. J Theor Biol 1984, 107:321-327.
22. Burr D.B., Milgrom C., Fyhrie D., Forwood M., Nyska M., Finestone A., et al. In vivo measurement of human tibial strains during vigorous activity. Bone 1996, 18:405-410.
23. Frost H.M. A brief review for orthopedic surgeons: fatigue damage (microdamage) in bone (its determinants and clinical implications). J Orthop Sci 1998, 3:272-281.
24. Naeije M., Hofman N. Biomechanics of the human temporomandibular joint during chewing. J Dent Res 2003, 82:528-531.
25. Breul R., Mall G., Landgraf J., Scheck R. Biomechanical analysis of stress distribution in the human temporomandibular-joint. Ann Anat 1999, 181:55-60.
26. dos Santos J.J. Supportive conservative therapies for temporomandibular disorders. Dent Clin North Am 1995, 39:459-477.
27. Sato M., Ochi T., Nakase T., Hirota S., Kitamura Y., Nomura S., et al. Mechanical tension-stress induces expression of bone morphogenetic protein (bmp)-2 and bmp-4, but not bmp-6, bmp-7, and gdf-5 mrna, during distraction osteogenesis. J Bone Miner Res 1999, 14:1084-1095.
28. Sonnesen L., Bakke M., Solow B. Bite force in pre-orthodontic children with unilateral crossbite. Eur J Orthod 2001, 23:741-749.
29. Kiliaridis S., Kjellberg H., Wenneberg B., Engström C. The relationship between maximal bite force, bite force endurance, and facial morphology during growth. A cross-sectional study. Acta Odontol Scand 1993, 51:323-331.
30. Marinescu R., Dealing D., Rapoff A. Finite element modeling of the anthropoid mandible: the effects of altered boundary conditions. Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol 2005, 283:300-309.
31. Barbenel J. The mechanics of the temporomandibular joint-theoretical and electromyographical study. J Oral Rehabil 1974, 1:19-27.
32. Weijs W.A., Hillen B. Cross-sectional areas and estimated intrinsic strength of the human jaw muscles. Acta Morphol Neerl Scand 1985, 23:267-274.
33. Koolstra J., van Eijden T. A method to predict muscle control in the kinematically and mechanically indeterminate human masticatory system. J Biomech 2001, 34:1179-1188.
34. Hart R., Hennebel V.V., Thongpreda N., Van Buskirk W.C., Anderson R.C. Modeling the biomechanics of the mandible: a three-dimensional finite element study. J Biomech 1992, 25:261-286.
35. Ferrario V.F., Sforza C., Tartaglia G.M., Fugazzola P., Serrao G. Harmonic analysis of mandibular form and symmetry with computerized tomographic views. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000, 89:112-117.
36. Zachow S., Hege H.C., Deuflhard P. Computer assisted planning in cranio-maxillofacial surgery. J Comput Inform Technol 2006, 14:53-64.
37. Smit T., Huyghe J., Cowin S. Estimation of the poroelastic parameters of cortical bone. J Biomech 2002, 35:829-835.
38. Misch C., Qu Z., Bidez W. Mechanical properties of trabecular bone in the human mandible: implications for dental implant treatment planning and surgical placement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999, 57:700-706.
39. Giesen E., Ding M., Dalstra M., van Eijden M. Mechanical properties of cancellous bone in the human mandibular condyle are anisotropic. J Biomech 2001, 34:799-803.
40. Craig R.G., Peyton F.A. Elastic and mechanical properties of human dentin. J Dent Res 1958, 37:710-718.
41. Tanaka M., Naito T., Yokota M., Kohno M. Finite element analysis of the possible mechanism of cervical lesion formation by occlusal force. J Oral Rehabil 2003, 30:60-67.
42. Toparli M., Sasaki S. Finite element analysis of the temperature and thermal stress in a postrestored tooth. J Oral Rehabil 2003, 30:921-926.
43. Nelson GJ. Three dimensional computer modeling of human mandibular biomechanics. PhD thesis, University of British Columbia; 1986.
44. Van Eijden T.M., Korfage J.A., Brugman P. Architecture of the human jaw-closing and jaw-opening muscles. Anat Rec 1997, 248:464-474.