Responsiveness of the bournemouth questionnaire in determining minimal clinically important change in subgroups of low back pain patients

Spine

Volumn 35, Issue 19, 2010, Pages 1801-1806

  Newell, David ^a   Bolton, Jennifer E ^a  

^a ANGLO EUROPEAN COLLEGE OF CHIROPRACTIC   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

clinical change; duration; low back pain; outcome measures; psychosocial; responsiveness; severity

Indexed keywords

ACUTE DISEASE; ARTICLE; BOURNEMOUTH QUESTIONNAIRE; CHIROPRACTIC; CHRONIC DISEASE; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LOW BACK PAIN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SCORING SYSTEM; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ACUTE DISEASE; ADULT; CHRONIC DISEASE; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; ENGLAND; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOW BACK PAIN; MALE; MANIPULATION, CHIROPRACTIC; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 77956405000     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181cc006b     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Steenstra IA, Anema JR, van Tulder MW, et al. Economic evaluation of a multistage return to work program for workers on sick leave due to low back pain. J Occup Rehabil 2006;16:557-578
2. Chou R, Huffman LH. Medications for acute and chronic low back pain: a review of the evidence for an American Pain Society/American College of Physicians clinical practice guideline. Ann Intern Med 2007;147:505-514 (Pubitemid 351664521)
3. Chou R, Huffman LH. Non-pharmacologic therapies for acute and chronic low back pain: a review of the evidence for an American Pain Society/ American College of Physicians clinical practice guideline. Ann Intern Med 2007;147:492-504. (Pubitemid 351664520)
4. Bogduk N. Outcome research. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2007;30:333-334
5. Van der Roer N, Ostelo RW, Bekkering GE, et al. Minimal clinically important change for pain intensity, functional status and general health status in patients with nonspecific low back pain. Spine 2006;31:578-582
6. Kovacs FM, Abraira V, Royuela A, et al. Minimum detectable and minimal clinically important changes for pain in patients with nonspecific neck pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2008;9:43.
7. Ostelo RW, de Vet HC. Clinically important outcomes in low back pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2005;19:593-607.
8. Ostelo RW, Deyo RA, Stratford P, et al. Interpreting change scores for pain and functional status in low back pain: towards international consensus regarding minimal important change. Spine 2008;33:90-94
9. Bolton JE, Breen A. The Bournemouth Questionnaire: a short form comprehensive outcome measure. I: psychometric properties in back pain patients. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1999;22:503-510
10. Bolton JE, Humphreys K. The Bournemouth Questionnaire: a short form comprehensive outcome measure. II: psychometric properties in neck pain patients. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2002;25:141-148
11. Hurst H, Bolton JE. Assessing the clinical significance of change scores recorded on subjective outcome measures. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2004; 27:26-35.
12. Perillo M, Bulbulian R. Responsiveness of the Bournemouth and Oswestry Questionnaires: a prospective pilot study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2003; 26:77-86.
13. Bolton JE. Sensitivity and specificity of outcome measures in patients with neck pain: detecting clinically significant improvement. Spine 2004;29: 2410-2417
14. Gay RE, Madson TJ, Cieslak KR. Comparison of the neck disability index and the neck Bournemouth Questionnaire in a sample of patients with chronic uncomplicated neck pain. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2007;30: 259-262
15. Heish C, Philips R, Adams A, et al. Functional outcomes of low back pain: comparison of four treatment groups in a randomized clinical trial. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1992;15:4-9.
16. Grotle M, Brox JI, Vollestad NK. Concurrent comparison of responsiveness in pain and functional status measurements used for patients with low back pain. Spine 2004;29:E492-501.
17. Rankin P. The Bournemouth questionnaire as an outcome measure in the rehabilitation of a person suffering with mechanical neck and arm pain and concurrent Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease: a case report. J Can ChiroprAssoc 2006;50:190-194
18. Larsen K, Le Boeuf-Yde C. The Bournemouth Questionnaire: can it be used to monitor and predict treatment outcome in chiropractic patients with persistent low back pain. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2005;28:219-227 (Pubitemid 41556923)
19. Newell D, Field J. Who will get better? Predicting clinical outcomes in a chiropractic practice. Clin Chiropr 2007;10:179-186
20. Leboeuf-Yde C. Low back pain. Time to get off the treadmill. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2001;24:63-65
21. Brennan GP, Fritz JM, Hunter SJ, et al. Identifying subgroups of patients with acute/sub acute "nonspecific" low back pain: results of a randomized clinical trial. Spine 2006;31:623-631
22. Turk DC. Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of treatments for patients with chronic pain. Clin J Pain 2002;18:355-365
23. Kovacs FM, Abraira V, Royuela A, et al. Minimal clinically important change for pain intensity and disability in patients with nonspecific low back pain. Spine 2007;32:2915-2920
24. Lauridsen HH, Hartvigsen J, Manniche LK, et al. Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference for pain and disability instruments in low back pain patients. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2006;7:82-98.
25. Guyatt GH, Norman GR, Juniper EF, et al. A critical look at transition ratings. J Clin Epidemiol 2002;55:900-908
26. Pincus T, Burton AK, Vogel S, et al. A systematic review of psychosocial factors as predictors of chronicity/disability in prospective cohorts of low back pain. Spine 2002;27:E109-20.
27. Waddell G, Burton AK, Main CJ. Introduction. In: Screening to Identify People at Risk of Long-Term Incapacity for Work: A Conceptual and Scientific Review. London, United Kingdom: Royal Society of Medicine Press Ltd; 2003;1-4.
28. Linton SJ. Do psychological factors increase the risk for back pain in the general population in both a cross-sectional and prospective analysis? Eur J Pain 2005;9:355-361
29. Bolton JE. Psychological distress and disability in back pain patients: evidence of sex differences. J Psychosom Res 1994;38:849-858