Two archetypes of motor control research

Motor Control

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2010, Pages

  Latash, Mark L ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BODY EQUILIBRIUM; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM; COMPUTER SYSTEM; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; MEMBRANE DEPOLARIZATION; MOTOR CONTROL; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); NERVE CELL; NOTE; PHYSICS; PHYSIOLOGY;

EID: 77956403480     PISSN: 10871640     EISSN: 15432696     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1123/mcj.14.3.e41     Document Type: Note

References (48)

1. Bassin, P.V., Bernstein, N.A. & Latash, L.P. (1966) On the problem of the relation between structure and function in the brain from a contemporary viewpoint. In: Grastschenkov, N.I. (Ed.) Physiology in clinical practice, pp. 38-71, Nauka: Moscow.
2. Bernstein, N.A. (1947) On the Construction of Movements. Medgiz: Moscow (in Russian).
3. Bernstein, N.A. (1996) On dexterity and its development. In: In: Latash, M.L. & Turvey, M.T. (Eds.) Dexterity and Its Development, pp. 1-244, Erlbaum Publ.: Mahwah, NJ
4. Feigenberg, I.M. (1969) Probabilistic prognosis and its significance in normal and pathological subjects. In: Cole M, Maltzman I (Eds) Handbook of Contemporary Soviet Psychology, p. 355-369, Basic Books: London, New York.
5. Feigenberg, I.M. (1998) The model of the future in motor control. In: Latash, M.L. (Ed.) Progress in Motor Control, vol. 1, Bernstein's Traditions in Movement Studies, p. 89-104, Human Kinetics: Urbana, IL.
6. Feldman, A.G. (1980) Superposition of motor programs. I. Rhythmic forearm movements in man. Neuroscience 5: 81-90 (Pubitemid 10203403)
7. Feldman, A.G. (2009) New insights into action-perception coupling. Experimental Brain Research 194: 39-58.
8. Feldman, A.G., Goussev, V., Sangole, A. & Levin, M.F. (2007) Threshold position control and the principle of minimal interaction in motor actions. Progress in Brain Research 165: 267-281. (Pubitemid 47513878)
9. Feldman, A.G. & Latash, M.L. (1982) Interaction of afferent and efferent signals underlying joint position sense: Empirical and theoretical approaches. Journal of Motor Behavior 14: 174-193.
10. Feldman, A.G. & Latash, M.L. (2005) Testing hypotheses and the advancement of science: Recent attempts to falsify the equilibrium-point hypothesis. Experimental Brain Research 161: 91-103.
11. Feldman, A.G. & Levin, M.F. (1995) Positional frames of reference in motor control: their origin and use. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18: 723-806.
12. Feldman, A.G. & Levin, M.F. (2009) The equilibrium-point hypothesis--past, present and future. Adv Exp Med Biol 629, 699-726.
13. Feldman, A.G., Ostry, D.J., Levin, M.F., Gribble, P.L. & Mitnitski, A.B. (1998) Recent tests of the equilibrium-point hypothesis (model). Motor Control 2: 189-205
14. Fleckenstein, J.L., Watumull, D., Bertocci, L.A., Parkey, R.W. & Peshock, R.M. (1992) Finger-specific flexor recruitment in humans: depiction by exercise-enhanced MRI. Journal of Applied Physiology 72: 1974-1977.
15. Foisy, M. & Feldman, A. (2006) Threshold control of arm posture and movement adaptation to load. Experimental Brain Research 175: 726-744. (Pubitemid 44715514)
16. Gomi, H. & Kawato, M. (1996) Equilibrium-point hypothesis examined by measured arm stiffness during multijoint movement. Science 272: 117-120. (Pubitemid 26110765)
17. Gottlieb, G.L. (1998) Rejecting the equilibrium-point hypothesis. Motor Control 2: 10-12.
18. Harris, C.M. & Wolpert, D.M. (1998). Signal-dependent noise determines motor planning. Nature 394: 780-784.
19. Hinder, M.R. & Milner, T.E. (2003) The case for an internal dynamics model versus equilibrium point control in human movement. Journal of Physiology 549: 953-963.
20. Kilbreath, S.L. & Gandevia, S.C. (1994) Limited independent flexion of the thumb and fingers in human subjects. Journal of Physiology 479: 487-497
21. Kugler, P.N. & Turvey, M.T. (1987) Information, natural law, and the self-assembly of rhythmic movement. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. Latash, L.P., Latash, M.L. & Mejier, O.G. (1999) Thirty years later: On the problem of the relation between structure and function in the brain from a contemporary viewpoint (1966). Part I. Motor Control 3: 329-345.
23. Latash, L.P., Latash, M.L. & Mejier, O.G. (2000) Thirty years later: On the problem of the relation between structure and function in the brain from a contemporary viewpoint (1966). Part II. Motor Control 4: 125-149.
24. Latash, M.L. (2008) Synergy. Oxford University Press: New York.
25. Latash, M.L. (2010) Stages in learning motor synergies: A view based on the equilibriumpoint hypothesis. Human Movement Science (in press).
26. Latash, M.L., Friedman, J., Kim, S.W., Feldman, A.G. & Zatsiorsky, V.M. (2010) Prehension synergies and control with referent hand configurations. Experimental Brain Research (in press).
27. Latash, M.L. & Gottlieb, G.L. (1990) Equilibrium-point hypothesis and variability of the amplitude, speed, and time of single-joint movements. Biofizika 35: 870-874
28. Latash, M.L., Kang, N. & Patterson, D. (2002) Finger coordination in persons with Down syndrome: Atypical patterns of coordination and the effects of practice. Experimental Brain Research 146: 345-355.
29. Latash, M.L., Scholz, J.P. & Schöner, G. (2002) Motor control strategies revealed in the structure of motor variability. Exercise and Sport Science Reviews 30: 26-31. (Pubitemid 34272900)
30. Latash, M.L., Scholz, J.P. & Schöner, G. (2007) Toward a new theory of motor synergies. Motor Control 11: 275-307.
31. Levin, M.F., Selles, R.W., Verheul, M.H.G. & Meijer, O.G. (2000) Deficits in the coordination of agonist and antagonist muscles in stroke patients: Implications for normal motor control. Brain Research 853: 352-369.
32. Musampa, N.K., Mathieu, P.A. & Levin, M.F. (2007) Relationship between stretch reflex thresholds and voluntary arm muscle activation in patients with spasticity. Experimental Brain Research 181: 579-593.
33. Newell, K.M. & Carlton, L.G. (1993) Force variability in isometric responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 14: 37-44.
34. Olafsdottir, H., Zhang, W., Zatsiorsky, V.M. & Latash, M.L. (2007) Age related changes in multi-finger synergies in accurate moment of force production tasks. Journal of Applied Physiology 102: 1490-1501. (Pubitemid 46571045)
35. Pilon, J.-F., De Serres, S.J. & Feldman, A.G. (2007) Threshold position control of arm movement with anticipatory increase in grip force. Experimental Brain Research 181: 49-67
36. Popescu, F.C., Hidler, J.M. & Rymer, W.Z. (2003) Elbow impedance during goal-directed movements. Experimental Brain Research 152: 17-28
37. Reisman, D.S. & Scholz, J.P. (2003). Aspects of joint coordination are preserved during pointing in persons with post-stroke hemiparesis. Brain 126:2510-2527.
38. Reisman, D.S. & Scholz, J.P. (2006) Workspace location influences joint coordination during reaching in post-stroke hemiparesis. Experimental Brain Research 170: 265-276.
39. Scholz, J.P., Kang, N., Patterson, D. & Latash, M.L. (2003) Uncontrolled manifold analysis of single trials during multi-finger force production by persons with and without Down syndrome. Experimental Brain Research 153: 45-58.
40. Scholz, J.P. & Schöner, G. (1999). The uncontrolled manifold concept: Identifying control variables for a functional task. Experimental Brain Research 126, 289-306.
41. Serlin, D.M. & Schieber, M.H. (1993) Morphologic regions of the multitendoned extrinsic finger muscles in the monkey forearm. Acta Anatomica 146: 255-266.
42. Shadmehr, R. & Wise, S.P. (2005) The computational neurobiology of reaching and pointing. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
43. Shinohara, M., Li, S., Kang, N., Zatsiorsky, V.M. & Latash, M.L. (2003) Effects of age and gender on finger coordination in maximal contractions and submaximal force matching tasks. Joural of Applied Physiology 94: 259-270.
44. Shinohara, M., Scholz, J.P., Zatsiorsky, V.M. & Latash, M.L. (2004) Finger interaction during accurate multi-finger force production tasks in young and elderly persons. Experimental Brain Research 156: 282-292.
45. Stepp, N. & Turvey, M.T. (2010) On strong anticipation. Cognitive Systems Research 11: 148-164.
46. Todorov, E. (2004). Optimality principles in sensorimotor control. Nature Neuroscience 7: 907-915.
47. Todorov, E. & Jordan, M.I. (2002) Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination. Nature Neuroscience 5: 1226-1235.
48. Zatsiorsky, V.M., Li, Z.M. & Latash, M.L. (2000) Enslaving effects in multi-finger force production. Experimental Brain Research 131: 187-195.