How minimalized extracorporeal circulation compares with the off-pump technique in coronary artery bypass grafting

ASAIO Journal

Volumn 56, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 446-456

  Harling, Leanne ^a   Warren, Oliver J ^a   Rogers, Paula L B ^a   Watret, Amy L ^a   Choong, Andrew M ^a   Darzi, Ara ^a   Angelini, Gianni D ^a   Athanasiou, Thanos ^a  

^a ST MARY S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADVERSE EFFECT; ADVERSE OUTCOMES; ALTERNATIVE TECHNOLOGIES; AREAS OF INTERESTS; BLOOD LOSS; CIRCULATORY SUPPORT; CORONARY ARTERIES; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFTING; EXTRACORPOREAL CIRCULATION; HIGH QUALITY; HIGH-RISK PATIENTS; LENGTH OF STAY; MODELING TECHNIQUE; RANDOM EFFECTS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REVASCULARIZATION; STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE;

BLOOD; GRAFTING (CHEMICAL); HEART; PUMPS;

INTENSIVE CARE UNITS;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; EXTRACORPOREAL CIRCULATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; META ANALYSIS; METHODOLOGY; OFF PUMP CORONARY SURGERY;

CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS, OFF-PUMP; EXTRACORPOREAL CIRCULATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE;

EID: 77956394076     PISSN: 10582916     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MAT.0b013e3181e61a21     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Gibbon JH Jr: Application of a mechanical heart and lung appa-ratus to cardiac surgery. Minn Med 37: 171-185, 1954.
2. Smith JA, Mack JA, Rosenfeldt FL, et al: Outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting: A 3 year analysis using the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database. Heart Lung Circ 9: 5-8, 2000.
3. Warren OJ, Smith AJ, Alexiou C, et al: The inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass: Part 1\mechanisms of pathogen-esis. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 23: 223-231, 2009.
4. Warren OJ, Watret AL, de Wit KL, et al: The inflammatory re-sponse to cardiopulmonary bypass: Part 2\Anti-inflammatory therapeutic strategies. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 23: 384-393, 2009.
5. Abu-Omar Y, Taggart DP: The present status of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 36: 312-321, 2009.
6. Biancari F, Rimpiläinen R: Meta-analysis of randomised trials comparing the effectiveness of miniaturised versus conventional cardiopulmonary bypass in adult cardiac surgery. Heart 95: 964-969, 2009.
7. Rimpilainen R, Biancari F, Wistbacka JO, et al: Outcome after coronary artery bypass surgery with miniaturized versus conventional cardiopulmonary bypass. Perfusion 23: 361-367, 2008.
8. Hou X, Yang F, Liu R, et al: Retrograde autologous priming of the cardiopulmonary bypass circuit reduces blood transfusion in small adults: A prospective, randomized trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol 26: 1061-1066, 2009.
9. Warren OJ, Wallace S, de Wit KL, et al: Variations in the application of various perfusion technologies in Great Britain and Ireland\A national survey. Artif Organs 34: 200-205, 2010.
10. Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, et al: Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: The QUOROM statement. Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses. Lancet 354: 1896-1900, 1999.
11. Alderson P, Green S, Higgins JPT (ed): Cochrane Reviewers' Handbook 4.2.1 [updated December 2003], Vol.1. Chichester, Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2004.
12. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C: Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 315: 629-634, 1997.
13. DerSimonian R, Laird N: Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 7: 177-188, 1986.
14. Higgins JP, Thompson SG: Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 21: 1539-1558, 2002.
15. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG: Measuring in-consistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 327: 557-560, 2003.
16. Egger M, Smith GD: Misleading meta-analysis. BMJ 310: 752-754, 1995.
17. Van Boven WJ, Gerritsen WB, Waanders FG, et al: Mini extracorpo-real circuit for coronary artery bypass grafting: Initial clinical and biochemical results: A comparison with conventional and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafts concerning global oxidative stress and alveolar function. Perfusion 19: 239-246, 2004.
18. Mazzei V, Nasso G, Salamone G, et al: Prospective randomized comparison of coronary bypass grafting with minimal extracor-poreal circulation system (MECC) versus off-pump coronary surgery. Circulation 116: 1761-1767, 2007.
19. Murakami T, Iwagaki H, Saito S: Equivalence of the acute cytokine surge and myocardial injury after coronary artery bypass grafting with and without a novel extracorporeal circulation system. J Int Med Res 33: 133-149, 2005.
20. Panday GF, Fischer S, Bauer A, et al: Minimal extracorporeal circulation and off-pump compared to conventional cardiopul-monary bypass in coronary surgery. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 9: 832-836, 2009.
21. Puehler T, Haneya A, Philipp A, et al: Minimal extracorporeal circulation: An alternative for on-pump and off-pump coronary revascularization. Ann Thorac Surg 87: 766-772, 2009.
22. Gerritsen WB, van Boven WJ, Wesselink RM, et al: Significant reduction in blood loss in patients undergoing minimal extra-corporeal circulation. Transfus Med 16: 329-334, 2006.
23. Stover EP, Siegel LC, Parks R, et al: Variability in transfusion practice for coronary artery bypass surgery persists despite national consensus guidelines: A 24-institution study. Institutions of the Multicenter Study of Perioperative Ischemia Research Group. Anesthesiology 88: 327-333, 1998. (Pubitemid 28081191)
24. Norman MJ, Sistino JJ, Acsell JR: The effectiveness of low-prime cardiopulmonary bypass circuits at removing gaseous emboli. J Extra Corpor Technol 36: 336-342, 2004.
25. Nollert G, Schwabenland I, Maktav D, et al: Miniaturized cardio-pulmonary bypass in coronary artery bypass surgery: Marginal impact on inflammation and coagulation but loss of safety margins. Ann Thorac Surg 80: 2326-2332, 2005.
26. Panesar SS, Chikwe J, Mirza SB, et al: Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery may reduce the incidence of stroke in patients with significant left main stem disease. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 56: 247-255, 2008.
27. Potger KC, McMillan D, Connolly T, et al: Coronary artery bypass grafting: An off-pump versus on-pump review. J Extra Corpor Technol 34: 260-266, 2002.
28. Hogue CW, Gottesman RF, Stearns J: Mechanisms of cerebral injury from cardiac surgery. Crit Care Clin 24: 83-98, 2008.
29. Mulholland JW, Anderson JR, Yarham GJ, et al: Miniature cardio-pulmonary bypass\The Hammersmith experience. Perfusion 22: 161-166, 2007.
30. Kaireviciute D, Aidietis A, Lip GY: Atrial fibrillation following cardiac surgery: Clinical features and preventative strategies. Eur Heart J 30: 410-425, 2009.
31. Raja SG, Behranwala AA, Dunning J: Does off-pump coronary artery surgery reduce the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 3: 647-652, 2004.
32. Athanasiou T, Aziz O, Mangoush O, et al: Does off-pump coro-nary artery bypass reduce the incidence of post-operative atrial fibrillation? A question revisited. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 26: 701-710, 2004. (Pubitemid 39273567)
33. Kuss O, von Salviati B, Borgermann J: Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: A systematic review and meta-analysis of propensity score analyses. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010 (in press).
34. Whitson BA, Huddleston SJ, Savik K, Shumway SJ: Risk of adverse outcomes associated with blood transfusion after cardiac surgery depends on the amount of transfusion. J Surg Res 158: 20-27, 2010.
35. Ferraris VA, Ferraris SP, Saha SP, et al: Perioperative blood transfu-sion and blood conservation in cardiac surgery: The Society of Thoracic Surgeons and The Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists clinical practice guideline. Ann Thorac Surg 83: S27-S86, 2007.
36. Niranjan G, Asimakopoulos G, Karagounis A, et al: Effects of cell saver autologous blood transfusion on blood loss and homologous blood transfusion requirements in patients undergoing cardiac surgery on-versus off-cardiopulmonary bypass: A randomised trial. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 30: 271-277, 2006.
37. Scott BH, Seifert FC, Grimson R, Glass PS: Resource utilization in on-and off-pump coronary artery surgery: Factors influencing postoperative length of stay\An experience of 1,746 consecutive patients undergoing fast-track cardiac anesthesia. J Car-diothorac Vasc Anesth 19: 26-31, 2005.
38. Sistino J: Using decision-analysis and meta-analysis to predict coronary artery bypass surgical outcomes\A model for comparing off-pump surgery to miniaturized cardiopulmonary bypass circuits. Perfusion 23: 255-260, 2008.
39. Davey Smith G, Egger M, Phillips AN: Meta-analysis. Beyond the grand mean? BMJ 315: 1610-1614, 1997.
40. Brown P, Brunnhuber K, Chalkidou K, et al: How to formulate research recommendations. BMJ 333: 804-806, 2006.