Adolescent Literacy—Reviewing Adolescent Literacy Reports: Key Components and Critical Questions

Journal of Literacy Research

Volumn 41, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 453-475

  Faggella Luby, Michael N ^a   Ware, Sharon M ^a   Capozzoli, Ashley ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956351827     PISSN: 1086296X     EISSN: 15548430     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10862960903340199     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. ACT. (2005). Reading between the lines: What the ACT reveals about college readiness in reading. Iowa City, IA: Author.
2. Applegate A. J. Applegate M. DeKonty McGeehan C. M. Pinto C. M. Kong A. (2009). The assessment of thoughtful literacy in NAEP: Why states aren't measuring up. The Reading Teacher, 62(5), 372–381.
3. Barber M. Mourshed M. (2007). How the world's best-performing school systems come out on top. London: McKinsey & Company.
4. Biancarosa G. Snow C. E. (2004.) Reading next—a vision for action and research in middle and high school literacy: A report to Carnegie Corporation of New York. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.
5. Ehren B. J. (2005). Looking for evidence-based practice in reading comprehension instruction. Topics in Language Disorders, 25(4), 310–321.
6. Faggella-Luby M. N. Deshler D. (2008). Reading comprehension in adolescents with LD: What we know; what we need to learn. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 23(2), 70–78.
7. Heller R. Greenleaf C. (2007). Literacy instruction in the content areas: Getting to the core of middle and high school improvement. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.
8. International Reading Association. (2006). Standards for middle and high school literacy coaches. Newark, DE: Author.
9. Kamil M. L. Borman G. D. Dole J. Kral C. C. Salinger T. Torgesen J. (2008). Improving adolescent literacy: Effective classroom and intervention practices: A practice guide (NCEE #2008-4027). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
10. Lee J. Grigg W. Donahue P. (2007). The nation's report card: Reading 2007 (NCES 2007496). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
11. Levy F. Murnane R. J. (2004). The new division of labor: How computers are creating the next job market. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
12. Mastropieri M. Scruggs T. Graetz J. (2003). Reading comprehension instruction for secondary students: Challenges for struggling students and teachers. Learning Disability Quarterly, 26(2), 103–116.
13. McPeak L. Trygg L. (2007). The secondary literacy and intervention guide: Helping high school districts transform into systems that produce life-changing results for all children. Mill Valley, CA: The Stupski Foundation.
14. Moje E. B. (2008). Youth cultures, literacies, and identities in and out of school. In Flood J. Heath S. B. Lapp D. (Eds.), Handbook of research in teaching the communicative and visual arts (pp. 207–219). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. National Center for Education Statistics. (2007). Mapping 2005 state proficiency standards onto the NAEP scales (NCES 2007-482). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
16. National Governors Association. (2005). Reading to achieve: A governor's guide to adolescent literacy. Washington, DC: National Governors Association, Center for Best Practices.
17. National School Boards Association. (2006). The next chapter: A school board guide to improving adolescent literacy. Alexandria, VA: Author.
18. Rowan B. Correnti R. Miller R. J. (2002). What large-scale, survey research tells us about teacher effects on student achievement: Insights from the Prospects study of elementary schools. Teachers College Record, 104(8), 1525–1567.
19. Scammacca N. Roberts G. Vaughn S. Edmonds M. Wexler J. Reutebuch C. K. (2007). Interventions for adolescent struggling readers: A meta-analysis with implications for practice. Portsmouth, NH: RMC Research Corporation, Center on Instruction.
20. Short D. Fitzsimmons S. (2007). Double the work: Challenges and solutions to acquiring language and academic literacy for adolescent English language learners—a report to Carnegie Corporation of New York. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.
21. Southern Regional Education Board. (2009). A critical mission: Making adolescent reading an immediate priority in SREB states, the report of the Committee to Improve Reading and Writing in Middle and High Schools. Atlanta, GA: Author.
22. Swanson H. L. (1999). Reading research for students with LD: A meta-analysis of intervention outcomes. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32(6), 504–532.
23. Torgesen J. K. Miller D. H. (2009). Assessments to guide adolescent literacy instruction. Portsmouth, NH: RMC Research Corporation, Center on Instruction.
24. Torgesen J. K. Houston D. D. Rissman L. M. Decker S. M. Roberts G. Vaughn S. (2007). Academic literacy instruction for adolescents: A guidance document from the Center on Instruction. Portsmouth, NH: RMC Research Corporation, Center on Instruction.
25. Viadero D. (2008, June 11). What works offers “quick reviews” of new studies. Education Week, 27(43), 1.