Flood simulation using a well-balanced shallow flow model

Journal of Hydraulic Engineering

Volumn 136, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 669-675

  Liang, Qiuhua ^a  

^a NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Floods; Friction; Hydraulic models; Shallow water; Simulation; Topography

Indexed keywords

2D SHALLOW WATER EQUATIONS; ANALYTICAL SOLUTIONS; APPROXIMATE RIEMANN SOLVER; COMPLEX DOMAINS; DENSE URBAN AREAS; FINITE VOLUME; FLOOD PLAINS; FLOOD SIMULATION; FLOOD WAVES; LINEAR RECONSTRUCTION; MODIFICATION METHODS; NUMERICAL PREDICTIONS; NUMERICAL RESULTS; NUMERICAL SCHEME; RECONSTRUCTION METHOD; RUNGE-KUTTA; SECOND ORDERS; SHALLOW FLOW; SHALLOW WATERS; SIMULATION; SOURCE TERMS; TIME INTEGRATION METHODS; WETTING AND DRYING; COMPLEX TOPOGRAPHIES; FLOW MODELLING; FRICTION TERM; IMPROVE-A; RIEMANN SOLVER; SHALLOW WATER EQUATIONS; WELL BALANCED; WELL- BALANCED SCHEMES;

EQUATIONS OF MOTION; FLOODS; FRICTION; HYDRAULIC MODELS; RUNGE KUTTA METHODS; TOPOGRAPHY;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; FLOODS;

ALGORITHM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FINITE VOLUME METHOD; FLOOD; FLOODPLAIN; FRICTION; NUMERICAL MODEL; SHALLOW-WATER EQUATION;

EID: 77956341280     PISSN: 07339429     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000219     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Audusse E. Bouchut F. Bristeau M.-O. Klein R. Perthame B. A fast and stable well-balanced scheme with hydrostatic reconstruction for shallow water flows. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. (USA) 2004, 25(6):2050-2065. SJOCE3, 1064-8275, 10.1137/S1064827503431090, and.
2. Bates P.D. de Roo A.P. J. A simple raster-based model for flood inundation simulation. J. Hydrol. 2000, 236:54-77. JHYDA7, 0022-1694, 10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00278-X, and.
3. Bermúdez A. Vázquez M.E. Upwind methods for hyperbolic conservation laws with source terms. Comput. Fluids 1994, 23:1049-1071. CPFLBI, 0045-7930, 10.1016/0045-7930(94)90004-3, and.
4. Brufau P. García-Navarro P. Vázquez-Cendón M.E. Zero mass error using unsteady wetting-drying conditions in shallow flows over dry irregular topography. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 2004, 45:1047-1082. IJNFDW, 0271-2091, 10.1002/fld.729, and.
5. Bussing T.R. A. Murman E.M. Finite volume method for the calculation of compressible chemically reacting flows. AIAA J. 1988, 26(9):1070-1078. AIAJAH, 0001-1452, 10.2514/3.10013, and.
6. Fiedler F.R. Ramirez J.A. A numerical method for simulating discontinuous shallow flow over an infiltrating surface. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 2000, 32(2):219-239. IJNFDW, 0271-2091, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0363(20000130)32:2<219::AID-FLD936>3.0.CO;2-J, and.
7. Greenberg J.M. LeRoux A.-Y. A well-balanced scheme for the numerical processing of source terms in hyperbolic equations. SIAM (Soc. Ind. Appl. Math.) J. Numer. Anal. 1996, 33:1-16. SJNAAM, 0036-1429, 10.1137/0733001, and.
8. Harten A. Engquist B. Osher S. Chakravarthy S.R. Uniformly high order accurate essentially non-oscillatory schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 1987, 71:231-303. JCTPAH, 0021-9991, 10.1016/0021-9991(87)90031-3, and.
9. Hirsch C. Computational methods for inviscid and viscous flows: Numerical computation of internal and external flows 1990, 2. Vol. Wiley, New York.
10. Hunter N.M. Benchmarking 2D hydraulic models for urban flood simulations. Proceedings of ICE, Water Management 2008, 161(1):13-30. 10.1680/wama.2008.161.1.13.
11. Liang Q. Borthwick A.G. L. Adaptive quadtree simulation of shallow flows with wet-dry fronts over complex topography. Comput. Fluids 2009, 38(2):221-234. CPFLBI, 0045-7930, 10.1016/j.compfluid.2008.02.008, and.
12. Liang Q. Borthwick A.G. L. Stelling G. Simulation of dam and dyke-break hydrodynamics on dynamically adaptive quadtree grids. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 2004, 46:127-162. IJNFDW, 0271-2091, 10.1002/fld.748, and.
13. Liang Q. Du G. Hall J.W. Borthwick A.G. L. Flood inundation modelling with an adaptive quadtree grid shallow water equation solver. J. Hydraul. Eng. 2008, 134(11):1603-1610. JHEND8, 0733-9429, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2008)134:11(1603), and.
14. Liang D. Lin B. Falconer R.A. A boundary-fitted numerical model for flood routing with shock-capturing capability. J. Hydrol. 2007, 332:477-486. JHYDA7, 0022-1694, 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.08.002, and.
15. Liang Q. Marche F. Numerical resolution of well-balanced shallow water equations with complex source terms. Adv. Water Resour. 2009, 32(6):873-884. AWREDI, 0309-1708, 10.1016/j.advwatres.2009.02.010, and.
16. Mignot E. Paquier A. Haider S. Modelling floods in a dense urban area using 2D shallow water equations. J. Hydrol. 2006, 327:186-199. JHYDA7, 0022-1694, 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.11.026, and.
17. Syme W.J. Dynamically linked two-dimensional/one-dimensional hydrodynamic modelling program for rivers, estuaries & coastal waters. 1991, M.Eng Thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Queensland, Australia.
18. Tarrant O. Todd M. Ramsbottom D. Wicks J. 2D floodplain modelling in the tidal Thames-Addressing the residual risk. J. Chart. Inst. Water Environ. Manag. 2005, 19(2):125-134. 10.1111/j.1747-6593.2005.tb00560.x, 1360-4015, and.
19. Thacker W.C. Some exact solutions to the nonlinear shallow-water wave equations. J. Fluid Mech. 1981, 107:499-508. JFLSA7, 0022-1120, 10.1017/S0022112081001882.
20. Toro E.F. Shock-capturing methods for free-surface shallow flows 2001, Wiley, Chichester, England.
21. van Leer B. Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme. V-A second-order sequel to Godunov's method. J. Comput. Phys. 1979, 32:101-136. JCTPAH, 0021-9991, 10.1016/0021-9991(79)90145-1.