Simulation of dam- and dyke-break hydrodynamics on dynamically adaptive quadtree grids

International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids

Volumn 46, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 127-162

  Liang, Q ^a   Borthwick, A G L ^a   Stelling, G ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Adaptive quadtree grid; Dam dyke break; Godunov type scheme; HLLC approximate Riemann solver; MUSCL Hancock method; Shallow water equations

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE QUADTREE GRIDS; FINITE VOLUME SOLVER; INTERFACE FLUXES;

COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; DAMS; DATA REDUCTION; FINITE VOLUME METHOD; FLOODS; INTERFACES (MATERIALS); MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS;

HYDRODYNAMICS;

DAM FAILURE; FLOOD; HYDRODYNAMICS; MODELING; SHALLOW-WATER EQUATION;

EID: 4344607336     PISSN: 02712091     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/fld.748     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Sakkas JG, Strelkoff T. Dam-break flood in a prismatic dry channel. Journal of Hydraulic Division (ASCE) 1973; 99(HY12):2195-2216.
2. Chen C. Laboratory verification of a dam-break flood model. Journal of Hydraulic Division (ASCE) 1980; 106:535-556.
3. Katopodes ND, Schamber DR. Applicability of dam-break flood wave models. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering (ASCE) 1983; 109(5):702-721.
4. Toro EF. Shock-Capturing Methods for Free-surface Shallow Flows. Wiley: Chichester, 2001.
5. García-Navarro P, Alcrudo F, Savirón JM. 1-D Open-channel flow simulation using TVD-McCormack scheme. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering (ASCE) 1992; 118(10):1359-1372.
6. Aureli F, Mignosa P, Tomirotti M. Numerical simulation and experimental verification of dam-break flows with shocks. Journal of Hydraulic Research 2000; 38(3):197-206.
7. Garcia-Navarro P, Fras A, Villanueva I. Dam-break flow simulation: some results for one-dimensional models of real cases. Journal of Hydrology 1999; 216:227-247.
8. Rahman M, Chaudhry MH. Simulation of dam-break flow with grid adaptation. Advances in Water Resources 1998; 21(1):1-9.
9. Akanbi AA, Katopodes ND. Models for flood propagation on initially dry land. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering (ASCE) 1988; 114(7):686-706.
10. Zoppou C, Roberts S. Catastrophic collapse of water supply reservoirs in urban areas. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering (ASCE) 1999; 125(7):686-695.
11. Alcrudo F, García-Navarro P. A high-resolution Godunov-type scheme in finite volumes for the 2D shallow-water equations. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 1993; 16:489-505.
12. Roe PL, Pike J. Efficient construction and utilisation of approximate Riemann solutions. In Computing Methods in Applied Science and Engineering. North-Holland: Amsterdam, 1984.
13. Zhao DH, Shen HW, Tabious III GQ, Lai SJ, Tan WY. Finite-volume two-dimensional unsteady-flow model for river basins. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering (ASCE) 1994; 120(7):864-883.
14. Osher S. Numerical solution of singular perturbation problems and hyperbolic systems of conservation laws. In Mathematical Studies, Axelsson O et al. (eds), vol. 47. North-Holland: Amsterdam, 1981.
15. Anastasiou K, Chan CT. Solution of the 2D shallow water equations using the finite volume method on unstructured triangular meshes. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 1997; 24:1225-1245.
16. Roe PL. Approximate Riemann solvers, parameter vectors and difference schemes. Journal of Computational Physics 1981; 43:357-372.
17. Sleigh PA, Gaskell PH, Berzina M, Wright NG. An unstructured finite-volume algorithm for predicting flow in rivers and estuaries. Computers and Fluids 1998; 27(4):479-508.
18. Toro EF, Spruce M, Speares W. Restoration of the contact surface in the HLL Riemann solver. Shock Waves 1994; 4:25-34.
19. Toro EF. A weighted average flux method for hyperbolic conservation laws. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London (A) 1989; 423:401-418.
20. Fraccarollo L, Toro EF. Experimental and numerical assessment of the shallow water model for two-dimension dam-break type problems. Journal of Hydraulic Research 1995; 33(6):843-863.
21. Zoppou C, Roberts S. Numerical solution of the two-dimensional unsteady dam break. Applied Mathematical Modelling 2000; 24:457-475.
22. Van Leer B. Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme IV: a new approach to numerical convection. Journal of Computational Physics 1977; 23:276.
23. Van Leer B. Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme V: a second order sequel to Godunov's method. Journal of Computational Physics 1979; 32:101.
24. Hu K, Mingham CG, Causon DM. A bore-capturing finite volume method for open-channel flows. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 1998; 28:1241-1261.
25. Causon DM, Ingram DM, Mingham CG, Yang G, Pearson RV. Calculation of shallow water flows using a Cartesian cut cell approach. Advances in Water Resources 2000; 23:545-562.
26. Greaves DM, Borthwick AGL. Hierarchical tree-based finite element mesh generation. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1999; 45:447-471.
27. Borthwick AGL, Marchant RD, Copeland GJM. Adaptive hierarchical grid model of water-borne pollutant transport. Advances in Water Resources 2000; 23:849-865.
28. Yiu C, Greaves DM, Cruz S, Saalehi A, Borthwick AGL. Quadtree grid generation: information handling, boundary fitting and CFD applications. Computers and Fluids 1996; 25(8):759-769.
29. Sibson R. A vector identity for the Dirichlet Tessellation. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 1980; 87:151-155.
30. Lloyd PM, Ball DJ, Stansby PK. Unsteady surface-velocity field measurement using particle tracking. Journal of Hydraulic Research 1995; 33(4):519-534.
31. Rogers BD, Fujihara M, Borthwick AGL. Adaptive Q-tree Godunov-type scheme for shallow water equations. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 2001; 35:247-280.
32. Rogers BD, Borthwick AGL, Taylor PH. Mathematical balancing of flux gradient and source terms prior to using Roe's approximate Riemann solver. Journal of Computational Physics 2003; 192(2):422-451.
33. Harten A, Lax PD, van Leer B. On upstream differencing and Godunov-type schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws. SIAM Review 1983; 25(1):35-61.
34. Toro EF. Riemann Solvers and Numerical Methods for Fluid Dynamics-A Practical Introduction. Springer: Berlin, 1997.
35. Hu K, Mingham GG, Causon DM. Numerical simulation of wave overtopping of coastal structures using the non-linear shallow water equations. Coastal Engineering 2000; 41:433-465.
36. Mingham CG, Causon DM. A high resolution finite volume method for the shallow water equations. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 1998; 124(6):605-614.
37. Fujihara M, Borthwick AGL. Godunov-type solution of curvilinear shallow-water equations. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering (ASCE) 2000; 126(11):827-836.
38. Zhou JG, Causon DM, Ingram DM, Mingham CG. Numerical solutions of the shallow water equations with discontinuous bed topography. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 2002; 38:769-788.
39. Soares Frazao S, Sillen S, Zech Y. Dam-break flow through sharp bends: physical model and 2D Boltzmann model validation. Proceedings of the CADAM Meeting, Wallingford, UK, 1998.
40. Duinmeijer SPA. Verification of Delft FLS. Technical Report, Delft University of Technology, 2002.
41. Henderson FM. Open Channel Flow. Macmillan: New York, 1966.
42. Battjes JA, Gerritsen H. Coastal modelling for flood defence. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 2002; 360(1796):1461-1475.