The test of a full-scale three-story RC structure with masonry infill walls

Engineering Structures

Volumn 32, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 3112-3121

  Pujol, S ^a   Fick, D ^b  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SOUTH DAKOTA SCHOOL OF MINES AND TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cyclic load; Drift capacity; Earthquake; Full scale; Infill; Masonry; Reinforced concrete; Stiffness; Strength; Walls

Indexed keywords

DRIFT CAPACITY; FULL-SCALE; INFILL; MASONRY; STRENGTH; WALLS;

BRICK; BRICKMAKING; BUILDING MATERIALS; CONCRETE BUILDINGS; CYCLIC LOADS; EARTHQUAKES; REINFORCED CONCRETE;

STIFFNESS;

CONCRETE STRUCTURE; CYCLIC LOADING; GROUND MOTION; MASONRY; REINFORCED CONCRETE; SEISMIC RESPONSE; STIFFNESS; STRENGTH; WALL;

EID: 77956338238     PISSN: 01410296     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.05.030     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Aschheim M. 1999 Kocaeli, Turkey, Earthquake reconnaissance report, Supplement A to Volume 16. Earthquake Spectra. December 2000. p. 237-79.
2. Sezen H., Whittaker A.S., Elwood K.J., Mosalam K.M. Performance of reinforced concrete buildings during the August 17, 1999 Kocaeli, Turkey earthquake, and seismic design and construction practice in Turkey. Eng Struct 2003, 25:103-114.
3. Kyriakides MA, Billington SL. Seismic retrofit of masonry-infilled non-ductile reinforced concrete frames using sprayable ductile fiber-reinforced cementitious composites. 14 WCEE, Beijing. Paper Number 05-04-0063. 2008.
4. Murty C.V.R., et al. At risk: the seismic performance of reinforced concrete frames with masonry infill walls. EERI, World Housing Encyclopedia 2006.
5. Akin L. Behavior of reinforced concrete frames with masonry infills in seismic regions. Ph.D. thesis. West Lafayette (IN): Purdue University. 2006.
6. Calvi G.M., Bolognini D. Seismic response of reinforced concrete frames infilled with masonry panels weakly reinforced. J Earthq Eng 2001, 5:153-185.
7. Fardis M.N., Panagiotakos T.B. Seismic design and response of bare and masonry-infilled reinforced concrete buildings part II: infilled structures. J Earthq Eng 1997, 1(3):475-503.
8. Hassan A.F., Sozen M.A. Seismic vulnerability assessment of low-rise buildings in regions with infrequent earthquakes. ACI Struct J 1997, 94(1):31-39.
9. Henderson RC, Fricke KE, Jones WD, Beavers JE, Bennett RM. Summary of large- and small-scale unreinforced masonry test program. Cookeville (Tennessee): Department of Civil Engineering, Tennessee Technological University; 2002.
10. Lee H.S., Woo S.W. Effect of masonry infills on seismic performance of a 3-storey R/C frame with non-seismic detailing. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 2002, 31(2):353-378.
11. Mehrabi A.B., Shing P.B., Schuller M.P., Noland J.L. Experimental evaluation of masonry-infilled RC frames. J Struct Eng (ASCE) 1996, 122(3):228-237.
12. Pinto A, Verzeletti G, Molina J, Varum H. Pseudo-dynamic tests on non-seismic resisting RC frames (bare and selective retrofit frames), ICONS Topic 2 (Assessment, Strengthening and Repair), JRC-ISIS Report, September 1999.
13. Negro P., Colombo A. Irregularities induced by nonstructural masonry panels in framed structures. Engineering Structures 1997, 19:576-585.
14. Hashemi A., Mosalam K.M. Shake-table experiment on reinforced concrete structure containing masonry infill wall. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 2006, 35(14):1827-1852.
15. Dolsek, Fajfar Soft storey effects in uniformly infilled reinforced concrete frames. J Earthq Eng 2001, 5(1):1-12.
16. Negro P., Verzeletti G. Effect of infills on the global behaviour of frames: energy considerations from pseudodynamic tests. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 1996, 25(8):753-773.
17. Negro P., Pinto A.V., Verzeletti G., Magonette G.E. PsD test on four-story RC building designed according to eurocodes. J Struct Eng 1996, 122:1409-1417.
18. Alcocer SM, Sanchez TA, Meli R. Comportamiento de La Estructura Tridimensional de Mampostería Confinada de Dos Niveles del CENAPRED, Centro Nacional de Prevención de Desastres, Mexico, June, 1993 [in Spanish].
19. Ocklestone A.J. Load tests on a three story reinforced concrete building in Johannesburg. The Structural Engineer 1955, 33(10):304-322.
20. Pujol S, Benavent-Climent A, Rodriguez ME, Smith-Pardo JP. Masonry infill walls: an effective alternative for seismic strengthening of low-rise reinforced concrete building structures. In: 14th World conference on earthquake enginering. 2008.
21. Read JB. Testing to destruction of full-size portal frames. Technical report TRA/390. London: Cement and Concrete Association. August 1965.
22. Fardis M.N., Bousias S.N., Franchioni G., Panagiotakos T.B. Seismic response and design of RC structures with plan-eccentric masonry infills. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 1999, 28:173-191.
23. Dolsek Matjaz, Peter Fajfar Mathematical modelling of an infilled RC frame structure based on the results of pseudo-dynamic tests. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 2001, 31:1215-1230.
24. Corte D.C., Fiorino L., Mazzolani F.M. Lateral-loading tests on a real RC building including masonry infill panels with and without FRP strengthening. J Mater Civil Eng, ASCE 2008, 20(6):419-431.
25. Benjamin J.R., Williams H.A. The behavior of one-story brick shear walls. J Struct Div, ASCE, Proc 1958, 84(ST4). Paper 1723, 1723.1-23.3.
26. Fiorato AE, Sozen MA, Gamble WL. An investigation of the interaction of reinforced concrete frames with masonry filler walls. Urbana (IL): Civil Engineering Studies, University of Illinois. 1970.
27. Brokken S, Bertero VV. Studies on effects of infills in seismic resistant RC construction. Report UCB/EERC, 81-12. Berkeley (CA): University of California. 1981.
28. Klingner R.E., Bertero V.V. Earthquake resistance of infilled frames. J Struct Div 1978, 104(6):973-989.
29. Aguilar G, Meli R, Díaz R, Vázquez del Mercado R. Influence of horizontal reinforcement on the behavior of confined masonry walls. In: Proc. 11th world conference on earthquake engineering. 1996, Paper No. 1380.
30. Zarnic R., Gosti S., Crewe A.J., Taylor C.A. Shaking table tests of 1:4 reduced-scale models of masonry infilled reinforced concrete frame buildings. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 2001, 30(6):819-834.
31. Fick D. Experimental investigation of a full-scale flat-plate reinforced concrete structure in the inelastic range of response. Ph.D. dissertation. W. Lafayette (IN): Purdue University. 2008.
32. Ozturk B. Seismic drift response of building structures in seismically active and near-fault regions, Ph.D. thesis. W. Lafayette (IN): Purdue University. 2003.
33. Shimazaki K, Sozen M. Strong ground motion drift and base shear coefficient for RC structures. In: Proc. 9th world conference on earthquake eng. vol. 5. 1988. p. 165-70.
34. Lepage A. A method for drift-control in earthquake-resistant design of RC building structures. Ph.D. thesis. Urbana: University of Illinois; 1997.
35. Shiga T, Shibata A, Takahashi T. Earthquake damage and wall index of reinforced concrete buildings, In: Proceedings, Tohuku district symposium, Architentural Institute of Japan, Dec. 1968, No. 12, 29-32 [in Japanese].
36. Wood S. Performance of reinforced concrete buildings during the 1985 Chile earthquake: implications for the design of structural walls. Earthquake Spectra 1991, 7(4):607-639.
37. Sezen H. Seismic behavior and modeling of reinforced concrete building columns, Berkeley: University of California; 2002.
38. Elwood K.J., Moehle J.P. Axial capacity model for shear-damaged columns. ACI Struct J, Amer Concr Inst 2005, 102(4):578-587.