Biomechanical and radiographic comparison of demineralized bone matrix, and a coralline hydroxyapatite in a rabbit spinal fusion model

Journal of Biomaterials Applications

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 195-215

  Dodds, Robert A ^a   York Ely, Amanda M ^a   Zhukauskas, Rasa ^a   Arola, Travis ^a   Howell, John ^a   Hartill, Caroline ^a   Cobb, Ronald R ^a   Fox, Casey ^b  

^a RTI Biologics Inc   (United States)

^b BioMedical Enterprises Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

biomechanical testing; demineralized bone matrix; palpation; rabbit spinal fusion; radiology

Indexed keywords

ARTHRODESIS; BIOMECHANICAL TESTING; BONE FORMATION; BONE GRAFT; CORALLINE HYDROXYAPATITE; DEMINERALIZED BONE MATRIX; ESSENTIAL COMPONENT; IN-VIVO; MECHANICAL STRENGTH; MOTION SEGMENTS; PALPATION; POTENTIAL SOURCES; RABBIT MODELS; SPINAL FUSION;

ANIMALS; APATITE; BIOMATERIALS; BIOMECHANICS; GRAFTS; HYDROXYAPATITE; POLYMETHYL METHACRYLATES; RADIATION; RADIOLOGY;

BONE;

CORALLINE HYDROXYAPATITE; HYDROXYAPATITE;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; AUTOTRANSPLANTATION; BIOMECHANICS; BONE DEVELOPMENT; BONE PROSTHESIS; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; CERAMICS; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; METHODOLOGY; RABBIT; RADIOGRAPHY; SPINE; SPINE FUSION; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ANIMALS; BIOMECHANICS; BONE SUBSTITUTES; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; CERAMICS; HYDROXYAPATITES; OSTEOGENESIS; RABBITS; SPINAL FUSION; SPINE; TRANSPLANTATION, AUTOLOGOUS;

EID: 77956307027     PISSN: 08853282     EISSN: 15308022     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0885328209345552     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Silber, J.S., Anderson, D.G., Daffner, S.D. et al. Donor Site Morbidity After Anterior Iliac Crest Bone Harvest for Single-level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion, Spine, 2003: 28: 134-139.
2. Younger, E.M. and Chapman, M.W. Morbidity at Bone Graft Donor Sites, J. Orthop. Trauma, 1989: 3: 192-195.
3. Zhang, M., Powers Jr, R.M. and Wolfinbarger Jr, L. Effect(s) of the Demineralization Process on the Osteoinductivity of Demineralized Bone Matrix, J. Periodontol., 1997: 68: 1085-1092.
4. Chesmel, K.D., Branger, J., Wertheim, H. and Scarborough, N. Healing Response to Various Forms of Human Demineralized Bone Matrix in Athymic Rat Cranial Defects, J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg., 1998: 56: 857-863 ; discussion 864-865.
5. Cobos, J.A., Lindsey, R.W. and Gugala, Z. The Cylindrical Titanium Mesh Cage for Treatment of a Long Bone Segmental Defect: Description of a New Technique and Report of Two Cases, J. Orthop. Trauma, 2000: 14: 54-59.
6. Edwards, J.T., Diegmann, M.H. and Scarborough, N.L. Osteoinduction of Human Demineralized Bone: Characterization in a Rat Model, Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., 1998: 357: 219-228.
7. Kado, K.E., Gambetta, L.A. and Perlman, M.D. Uses of Grafton for Reconstructive Foot and Ankle Surgery, J. Foot Ankle Surg., 1996: 35: 59-66.
8. Russell, J., Scarborough, N. and Chesmel, K. Re: Ability of Commercial Demineralized Freeze-dried Bone Allograft to Induce New Bone Formation (1996;67:918-26), J. Periodontol., 1997: 68: 804-806.
9. Urist, M.R. and Dowell, T.A. Inductive Substratum for Osteogenesis in Pellets of Particulate Bone Matrix, Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., 1968: 61: 61-78.
10. Martin Jr, G.J., Boden, S.D., Titus, L. and Scarborough, N.L. New Formulations of Demineralized Bone Matrix as a More Effective Graft Alternative in Experimental Posterolateral Lumbar Spine Arthrodesis, Spine, 1999: 24: 637-645.
11. Morone, M.A. and Boden, S.D. Experimental Posterolateral Lumbar Spinal Fusion with a Demineralized Bone Matrix Gel, Spine, 1998: 23: 159-167.
12. Mulliken, J.B., Glowacki, J., Kaban, L.B., Folkman, J. and Murray, J.E. Use of Demineralized Allogeneic Bone Implants for the Correction of Maxillocraniofacial Deformities, Ann. Surg., 1981: 194: 366-372.
13. Reddi, A.H. Initiation of Fracture Repair by Bone Morphogenetic Proteins, Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., 1998: 355 (Suppl): S66 - S72.
14. Stevenson, S. Enhancement of Fracture Healing with Autogenous and Allogeneic Bone Grafts, Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., 1998: 355 (Suppl): S239 - S246.
15. Urist, M.R. Bone: Formation by Autoinduction, Science, 1965: 150: 893-899.
16. Urist, M.R., DeLange, R.J. and Finerman, G.A. Bone Cell Differentiation and Growth Factors, Science, 1983: 220: 680-686.
17. Urist, M.R. and Strates, B.S. Bone Formation in Implants of Partially and Wholly Demineralized Bone Matrix. Including Observations on Acetone-fixed Intra and Extracellular Proteins, Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., 1970: 71: 271-278.
18. Grauer, J.N., Bomback, D.A., Lugo, R., Troiano, N.W., Patel, T.C. and Friedlaender, G.E. Posterolateral Lumbar Fusions in Athymic Rats: Characterization of a Model, Spine J., 2004: 4: 281-286.
19. Lee, Y.P., Jo, M., Luna, M., Chien, B., Lieberman, J.R. and Wang, J.C. The Efficacy of Different Commercially Available Demineralized Bone Matrix Substances in an Athymic Rat Model, J. Spinal Disord. Tech., 2005: 18: 439-444.
20. Lomas, R.J., Gillan, H.L., Matthews, J.B., Ingham, E. and Kearney, J.N. An Evaluation of the Capacity of Differently Prepared Demineralised Bone Matrices (DBM) and Toxic Residuals of Ethylene Oxide (EtOx) to Provoke an Inflammatory Response In Vitro, Biomaterials, 2001: 22: 913-921.
21. Peterson, B., Whang, P.G., Iglesias, R., Wang, J.C. and Lieberman, J.R. Osteoinductivity of Commercially Available Demineralized Bone Matrix. Preparations in a Spine Fusion Model, J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., 2004: 86-A: 2243-2250.
22. Adkisson, H.D., Strauss-Schoenberger, J., Gillis, M., Wilkins, R., Jackson, M. and Hruska, K.A. Rapid Quantitative Bioassay of Osteoinduction, J. Orthop. Res., 2000: 18: 503-511.
23. Glowacki, J. A Review of Osteoinductive Testing Methods and Sterilization Processes for Demineralized Bone, Cell Tissue Bank., 2005: 6 (1). 3-12.
24. Han, B., Tang, B. and Nimni, M.E. Quantitative and Sensitive In Vitro Assay for Osteoinductive Activity of Demineralized Bone Matrix, J. Orthop. Res., 2003: 21: 648-654.
25. Honsawek, S., Powers, R.M. and Wolfinbarger, L. Extractable Bone Morphogenetic Protein and Correlation with Induced New Bone Formation in an In Vivo Assay in the Athymic Mouse Model, Cell Tissue Bank., 2005: 6: 13-23.
26. Wang, J. and Glimcher, M.J. Characterization of Matrix-induced Osteogenesis in Rat Calvarial Bone Defects: I. Differences in the Cellular Response to Demineralized Bone Matrix Implanted in Calvarial Defects and in Subcutaneous Sites, Calcif. Tissue Int., 1999: 65: 156-165.
27. Wang, J.C., Alanay, A., Mark, D. et al. A Comparison of Commercially Available Demineralized Bone Matrix for Spinal Fusion, Eur. Spine J., 2007: 16: 1233-1240.
28. Zhang, M., Powers Jr, R.M. and Wolfinbarger Jr, L. A Quantitative Assessment of Osteoinductivity of Human Demineralized Bone Matrix, J. Periodontol., 1997: 68: 1076-1084.
29. Damien, C.J., Parsons, J.R., Benedict, J.J. and Weisman, D.S. Investigation of a Hydroxyapatite and Calcium Sulfate Composite Supplemented with an Osteoinductive Factor, J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 1990: 24: 639-654.
30. Damien, C.J., Parsons, J.R., Prewett, A.B., Huismans, F., Shors, E.C. and Holmes, R.E. Effect of Demineralized Bone Matrix on Bone Growth within a Porous HA Material: A Histologic and Histometric Study, J. Biomater. Appl., 1995: 9: 275-288.
31. Elsinger, E.C. and Leal, L. Coralline Hydroxyapatite Bone Graft Substitutes, J. Foot Ankle Surg., 1996: 35: 396-399.
32. Holmes, R., Mooney, V., Bucholz, R. and Tencer, A. A Coralline Hydroxyapatite Bone Graft Substitute. Preliminary Report, Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., 1984: 188: 252-262.
33. Holmes, R.E., Bucholz, R.W. and Mooney, V. Porous Hydroxyapatite as a Bone-graft Substitute in Metaphyseal Defects. A Histometric Study, J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., 1986: 68: 904-911.
34. Holmes, R.E., Bucholz, R.W. and Mooney, V. Porous Hydroxyapatite as a Bone Graft Substitute in Diaphyseal Defects: A Histometric Study, J. Orthop. Res., 1987: 5: 114-121.
35. Light, M. and Kanat, I.O. The Possible Use of Coralline Hydroxyapatite as a Bone Implant, J. Foot Surg., 1991: 30: 472-476.
36. Marchac, D. and Sandor, G. Use of Coral Granules in the Craniofacial Skeleton, J. Craniofac. Surg., 1994: 5: 213-217.
37. Mooney, V., Massie, J.B., Lind, B.I., Rah, J.H., Negri, S. and Holmes, R.E. Comparison of Hydroxyapatite Granules to Autogenous Bone Graft in Fusion Cages in a Goat Model, Surg. Neurol., 1998: 49: 628-633 ; discussion 633-634.
38. Sartoris, D.J., Holmes, R.E., Bucholz, R.W., Mooney, V. and Resnick, D. Coralline Hydroxyapatite Bone-graft Substitutes in a Canine Metaphyseal Defect Model. Radiographic-histometric Correlation, Invest. Radiol., 1986: 21: 851-857.
39. Sartoris, D.J., Holmes, R.E., Bucholz, R.W., Mooney, V. and Resnick, D. Coralline Hydroxyapatite Bone-graft Substitutes in a Canine Diaphyseal Defect Model. Radiographic-Histometric Correlation, Invest. Radiol., 1987: 22: 590-596.
40. Walsh, W.R., Chapman-Sheath, P.J., Cain, S., Debes, J., Bruce, W.J., Svehla, M.J. and Gillies, R.M. A Resorbable Porous Ceramic Composite Bone Graft Substitute in a Rabbit Metaphyseal Defect Model, J. Orthop. Res., 2003: 21: 655-661.
41. Parikh, S.N. Bone Graft Substitutes in Modern Orthopedics, Orthopedics, 2002: 25: 1301-1309 ; quiz 1310-1311.
42. Khan, S.N., Tomin, E. and Lane, J.M. Clinical Applications of Bone Graft Substitutes, Orthop. Clin. North Am., 2000: 31: 389-398.
43. Leupold, J.A., Barfield, W.R., An, Y.H. and Hartsock, L.A. A Comparison of ProOsteon, DBX, and Collagraft in a Rabbit Model, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater., 2006: 79: 292-297.
44. Bomback, D.A., Grauer, J.N., Lugo, R., Troiano, N., Patel, T. and Friedlaender, G.E. Comparison of Posterolateral Lumbar Fusion Rates of Grafton Putty and OP-1 Putty in an Athymic Rat Model, Spine, 2004: 29: 1612-1617.
45. Frenkel, S.R., Moskovich, R., Spivak, J., Zhang, Z.H. and Prewett, A.B. Demineralized Bone Matrix. Enhancement of Spinal Fusion, Spine, 1993: 18: 1634-1639.