A comparison of ProOsteon, DBX, and collagraft in a rabbit model

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials

Volumn 79, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 292-297

  Leupold, John A ^a   Barfield, William R ^a,b   An, Yuehuei H ^a   Hartsock, Langdon A ^a  

^a MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b School of Business   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; BIOMECHANICS; BONE; DEFECTS; GROWTH KINETICS; RADIOGRAPHY;

ALLOGRAFT BONE; BONE GRAFT SUBSTITUTES (BGS); BONY INGROWTH; OSTEOCONDUCTIVITY;

GRAFTS;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BONE CONDUCTION; BONE GRAFT; BONE GROWTH; BONE INDUCTION; COMPOSITE GRAFT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMINERALIZATION; IN VIVO STUDY; MORBIDITY; MORPHOMETRICS; NONHUMAN; OSTEOLYSIS; PROSTHESIS MATERIAL; RABBIT; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

ANIMALS; BONE DEMINERALIZATION TECHNIQUE; BONE MATRIX; BONE SUBSTITUTES; CALCIUM PHOSPHATES; CERAMICS; COLLAGEN; FEMALE; MODELS, ANIMAL; RABBITS;

EID: 33750479048     PISSN: 00219304     EISSN: 15524981     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.30541     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Khan SN, Tomin E, Lane JM. Clinical applications of bone graft substitutes. Orthop Clin North Am 2000;31:389-398.
2. Behairy Y, Jasty M. Bone grafts and bone substitutes in hip and knee surgery. Orthop Clin North Am 1999;30:661-671.
3. Greenwald AS, Boden SD, Goldberg VM, Khan Y, Laurencin CT, Rosier RN, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, The Committee on Biological Implants. Bone-graft substitutes: Facts, fictions, and applications. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001;83 (Suppl 2, Part 2):98-103.
4. Behravesh E, Yasko AW, Engel PS, Mikos AG. Synthetic biodegradable polymers for orthopaedic applications. Clin Orthop 1999;367 (Suppl):S118-Sl29.
5. Eggli PS, Müller W, Schenk RK. Porous hydroxyapatite and tricalcium phosphate cylinders with two different pore size ranges implanted in the cancellous bone of rabbits. Clin Orthop 1988;232:127-138.
6. Grundel R, Chapman M, Yee T, Moore D. Autogenic bone marrow and porous biphasic calcium phosphate ceramic for segmented defects in the canine ulna. Clin Orthop 1991;266:244-258.
7. Jensen SS, Aaboe M, Pinholt EM, Hjorting-Hansen E, Melsen F, Ruyter IE. Tissue reaction and material characteristics of four bone substitutes. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:55-66.
8. Louisia S, Stromboni M, Meunier A, Sedel L, Petite H. Coral grafting supplemented with bone marrow. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1999;81:719-724.
9. Moore D, Chapman M, Marske D. The evaluation of a biphasic calcium phosphate ceramic for use in grafting long bone defects. J Orthop Res 1987;5:356-365.
10. Shimazaki K, Mooney V. Comparative study of porous hydroxyapatite and tricalcium phosphate as bone substitute. J Orthop Res 1985;3:301-310.
11. Russell JL, Block JE. Clinical utility of demineralized bone matrix for osseous defects, arthrodesis, and reconstruction: Impact of processing techniques and study methodology. Orthop Rev 1999;22:524-531.
12. Hopp SG, Dahners LE, Gilbert JA. A study of the mechanical strength of long bone defects treated with various bone autograft substitutes: An experimental investigation in the rabbit. J Orthop Res 1989;7:579-584.
13. Ohura K, Bohner M, Hardouin P, Lemaitre J, Pasquier G, Flautre B. Resorption of, and bone formation from, new β-tricalcium phosphate-monocalcium phosphate cements: An in vivo study. J Biomed Mater Res 1996;30:193-200.
14. Bauer TW, Mahovlic D. Cutting and grinding methods for hard-tissue histology. In: An YH, Martin KL, editors. Handbook of Histology Methods for Bone and Cartilage. Totowa, NJ: Humana; 2003. p 233-242.
15. Spurr AR. A low-viscosity epoxy resin embedding medium for electron microscopy. J Ultrastruct Res 1969;26:31-43.
16. Blomlof L, Lindskog S, Appelgren R, Jonsson B, Weintraub A, Hammarstrom L. New attachment in monkeys with experimental periodontitis with and without removal of the cementum. J Clin Periodontol 1987;14:136-143.
17. Friedman RJ, Bauer TW, Garg K, Jiang M, An YH, Draughn RA. Histological and mechanical comparison of hydroxyapatite coated cobalt-chrome and titanium implants in the rabbit femur. J Appl Biomater 1995;6:231-235.
18. An YH, Moreira PL, Kang QK. Principles of embedding and common protocols. In: An YH, Martin KL, editors. Handbook of Histology Methods for Bone and Cartilage. Totowa, NJ: Humana; 2003. p 185-197.
19. An YH, Friedman RJ. Animal models of bone defect repair. In: An YH, Friedman RJ, editors. Animal Models in Orthopaedic Research. Boca Raton: CRC; 1999. p 241-255.
20. Hollinger JO, Kleinschmidt JC. The critical size defect as an experimental model to test bone repair materials. J Craniofac Surg 1990;1:60-68.
21. Burchardt H. The biology of bone graft repair. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1983;174:28-42.
22. Boyce T, Edwards J, Scarborough N. Allograft bone. The influence of processing on safety and performance. Orthop Clin North Am 1999;30:571-581.
23. Cornell CN. Osteobiologics. Bull Hosp Joint Dis 2004;62:13-17.
24. Parikh SN. Bone graft substitutes in modern orthopedics. Orthopedics Rev 2002;25:1301-1309.
25. Gazdag AR, Lane JM, Glaser D, Forster RA. Alternatives to autogenous bone graft: Efficacy and indications. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 1995;3:1-8.
26. Finkemeier CG. Bone-grafting and bone-graft substitutes. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002;84:454-464.
27. Buser D, Hoffmann B, Bernard JP, Lussi A, Mauler D, Schenk RK. Evaluation of filling materials in membrane-protected bone defects. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998;9:137-150.