Online-questionnaire design guidelines

Handbook of Research on Electronic Surveys and Measurements

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 44-64

  Lumsden, Joanna ^a  

^a NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL CANADA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956291928     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59140-792-8.ch005     Document Type: Chapter

References (31)

1. American Statistical Association. (1999). American Statistical Association series: What is a survey? Retrieved July 7, 2003, from http://www.amstat.org/sections/srms/brochures/designquest.pdf
2. Badre, A. N. (2002). Shaping Web usability: Interaction design in context. Boston, MA: Pearson Education Inc.
3. Bandilla, W., Bosnjak, M., & Altdorfer, P. (2003). Self-administration effects? Acomparison of Webbased and traditional written self-administered surveys using the ISSP Environment Module. Social Science Computer Review, 21(2), 235-243.
4. Belson, W.A. (1981). The design and understanding of survey qestions. UK: Gower Publishing Co. Ltd.
5. Brewer, J. (2001, January 4). How people with disabilities use the Web (Report W3C). [Working draft].
6. Brewer, J. (2001), How people with disabilities use the Web. W3C Technical Report (Working Draft). Accessed January 4, 2005.
7. CASRO (1998). Council of American Survey Research Organization guidelines for survey research quality. Retrieved 7th July 2003, from http://www.casro.org/guidelines.cfm
8. Coyne, K. P., & Nielsen, J. (2001). Beyond ALT text: Making the Web easy to use for users with disabilities. Fremont, CA: Nielsen Norman Group.
9. Coyne, K. P., & Nielsen, J. (2002). Web usability for senior citizens. Fremont, CA: Nielsen Norman Group.
10. Crawford, S. D., Couper, M. P., & Lamias, M. J. (2001). Web surveys: Perceptions of burden. Social Science Computer Review, 19(2), 146-162.
11. Dillman, D. A. (1978). Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method. New York: Wiley-Interscience.
12. Dillman, D. A. (2000). Mail and Internet surveys: The tailored design method. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
13. Fink, A. (1995). How to ask survey questions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
14. Hinton, S. M. (1998, April 14-18). From home page to home site: Effective Web resource discovery at the ANU. In Proceedings of Seventh International World Wide Web Conference (WWW7), Brisbane, Australia, The Australian National University.
15. Jackson, W. (1988). Research methods: Rules for survey design and analysis. Scarborough: Prentice-Hall.
16. Kothari, R., & Basak, J. (2002, May 7-11). Perceptually automated evaluation of Web page layouts. In Proceedings of Eleventh International World Wide Web Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii. IBM India Research Laboratory.
17. Kwak, N., & Radler, B. (2002). A comparison between mail and Web surveys: Response pattern, respondent profile, and data quality. Journal of Official Statistics, 18(2), 257-274.
18. Lindgaard, G. (1994). Usability testing and system evaluation. London: Chapman & Hall Inc.
19. Lumsden, J., & Morgan, W. (2005, May 15-18). Online questionnaire design: Establishing guidelines and evaluating existing support. In Proceedings of International Conference of the Information Resources Management Association (IRMA'2005), San Diego.
20. Lynch, P. J., & Horton, S. (1997). Web style guide. Yale Center for Advanced Instructional Media, Italy.
21. National Cancer Institute (2002). National Cancer Institute's research-based Web design and usability guidelines. Retrieved June 10, 2003, from http://usability.gov/guidelines/index.html
22. National Institute on Aging and the National Library of Medicine (2001). Making your Web site senior friendly. Retrieved June 19, 2003, fromhttp://www.nlm.nih.gov/pubs/checklist.pdf
23. Norman, K. L., Lee, S., Moore, P., Murry, G. C., Rivadeneira, W., Smith, B. K., & Verdines, P. (2003). Online survey design guide. University of Maryland. Retrieved June 17, 2003, from http://lap.umd.edu/survey_design/tools.html
24. OECD. (2001). Bridging the "digital divide": Issues and policies in OECD countries. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. Retrieved July 3, 2003, from http://www.oecd.org
25. OECD. (2002). Organisation for economic cooperation and development ITC database. Organisa tion for Economic Cooperation and Development. Retrieved July 2, 2003, from http://www.oecd.org/EN/statistics/0,EN-statistics-13-nodirectorate-no-no--13,00.html
26. Oppenheim, A. N. (1992). Questionnaire design, interviewing and attitude measurement. London: Pinter Publishers.
27. Schonlau, M., Fricker, R. D., & Elliott, M. N. (2001). Conducting research via e-mail and the Web. RAND. Retrieved June 16, 2003, from http://www.rand.org/publications/MR/MR1480/
28. Stover, A., Coyne, K. P., & Nielsen, J. (2002). Designing usable site maps for Web sites. Fremont, CA: Nielsen Norman Group.
29. Stover, A., & Nielsen, J. (2002). Accessibility and usability of flash for users with disabilities. Fremont, CA: Nielsen Norman Group.
30. Taylor-Powell, E. (1998). Questionnaire design: Asking questions with a purpose (Report G3658-2). University of Wisconsin - Extension, Wisconsin, May.
31. W3C (1999). Web content accessibility guidelines 1.0. Retrieved une 8, 2003, from http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/WAI-WEBCONTENT-19990505