Performance of a generic approach in automated essay scoring

Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 1-17

  Attali, Yigal ^a   Bridgeman, Brent ^b   Trapani, Catherine ^a  

^a EDUCATIONAL TESTING SERVICE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956291605     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15402525     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Attali, Y., & Burstein, J. (2006). Automated essay scoring with e-rater( V.2. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 4(3). Available from http://www.jtla.org.
2. Attali, Y. (2007). Construct Validity of e-rater in Scoring TOEFL Essays (ETS RR-07-21). Educational Testing Service: Princeton, NJ.
3. Attali, Y., & Powers, D. (2008). A developmental writing scale (ETS RR-08-19). Educational Testing Service: Princeton, NJ.
4. Attali, Y., & Powers, D. (2009). Validity of scores for a developmental writing scale based on automated scoring. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 978-993.
5. Ben-Simon, A., & Bennett, R.E. (2007). Toward more substantively meaningful automated essay scoring. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 6(1). Available from http://www.jtla.org.
6. Breland, H. M., & Jones, R. J. (1984). Perceptions of writing skills. Written Communication, 1, 101-119.
7. Written Communication, 1, 101-119. Burstein, J.C., Kukich, K.,Wolff, S., Lu, C., & Chodorow, M. (1998, April). Computer analysis of essays. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council of Measurement in Education, San Diego, CA.
8. Elliot, S.M. (2001, April). IntelliMetric™: From here to validity. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA.
9. Elliott, S. (2003). Intellimetric™: From here to validity. In M.D. Shermis & J.C. Burstein (Eds.), Automated essay scoring: A cross-disciplinary perspective (pp. 71-86). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10. Elliot, S., & Mikulas, C. (2004, April). How does IntelliMetric™ score essay responses? A mind based approach. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
11. th ed., pp. 187-220). Westport, CT: Praeger.
12. Huot, B. (1988). The validity of holistic scoring: A comparison of the talk-aloud protocols of novice and expert holistic raters. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Indianna University of Pennsylvania.
13. Landauer, T.K., Foltz, P.W., & Laham, D. (1998). Introduction to latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes, 25, 259-284.
14. Landauer, T.K., Laham, D., & Foltz, P.W. (2003). Automated scoring and annotation of essays with the Intelligent Essay Assessor. In M. D. Shermis & J. Burstein (Eds.), Automated essay scoring: A cross-disciplinary perspective (pp. 87-112). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
15. Page, E.B. (1966). The imminence of grading essays by computer. Phi Delta Kappan, 48, 238-243.
16. Page, E.B. (1994). Computer grading of student prose, using modern concepts and software. Journal of Experimental Education, 62, 127-142.
17. Rudner, L.M., Garcia, V., & Welch, C. (2006). An Evaluation of the IntelliMetricSM Essay Scoring System. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 4(4). Available from http://www.jtla.org.