Does cost-benefit analysis or self-control predict involvement in two forms of aggression?

Aggressive Behavior

Volumn 36, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 292-304

  Archer, John ^a   Fernández Fuertes, Andrés A ^b   Thanzami, Van Lal ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL LANCASHIRE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CANTABRIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Aggression between partners; Attitudes to partner violence; Costs and benefits of aggression; Indirect aggression; Physical aggression; Self control; Victimization

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGGRESSION; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CONTROL; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMPULSIVENESS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTIVATION; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; SELF CONCEPT; SEX DIFFERENCE; SOCIAL CONTROL; VICTIM;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGGRESSION; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CRIME VICTIMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMPULSIVE BEHAVIOR; INTERNAL-EXTERNAL CONTROL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTIVATION; QUESTIONNAIRES; SELF CONCEPT; SEX FACTORS; SOCIAL CONTROL, FORMAL; SOCIAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 77956289962     PISSN: 0096140X     EISSN: 10982337     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ab.20358     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Archer J. 1988. The Behavioural Biology of Aggression. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
2. Archer J. 1994. Violence between men. In: Archer J (ed.). Male Violence. London and New York: Routledge, pp 121-140.
3. Archer J. 2000. Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: A meta-analytic review. Psychol Bull 126:651-680.
4. Archer J. 2002. Sex differences in physically aggressive acts between heterosexual partners: A meta-analytic review. Aggr Violent Behav 7:313-351.
5. Archer J. 2004. Sex differences in aggression in real-world settings: A meta-analytic review. Rev Gen Psychol 8:291-322.
6. Archer J. 2005. Costs and Benefits Questionnaire (CBQ). Preston, UK: University of Central Lancashire.
7. Archer J. 2006. Cross-cultural differences in physical aggression between partners: A social-role analysis. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 10: 113-133.
8. Archer J. 2007. Physical aggression as a function of perceived fighting ability among male and female prisoners. Aggr Behav 33:563-573.
9. Archer J. 2009. Does sexual selection explain human sex differences in aggression? Behav Brain Sci 32:249-311.
10. Archer J, Coyne SM. 2005. An integrated review of indirect, relational, and social aggression. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 9:212-230.
11. Archer J, Southall N. 2009. Does cost-benefit analysis or self-control predict involvement in bullying behavior by male prisoners? Aggr Behav 35:31-40.
12. Archer J, Thanzami VL. 2007. The relation between physical aggression, size and strength, among a sample of young Indian men. Pers Individ Diff 43:627-633.
13. Archer J, Thanzami VL. 2009. The relation between mate value, entitlement, physical aggression, size and strength, among a sample of young Indian men. Evol Hum Behav 30:315-321.
14. Archer J, Ireland JL, Power CL. 2007. Differences between bullies and victims, and men and women, on aggression-related variables among prisoners. Br J Soc Psychol 46:299-322.
15. Barratt ES, Stanford MS, Dowdy L, Liebman MJ, Kent TA. 1999. Impulsive and premeditated aggression: A factor analysis of selfreported acts. Psychiatry Res 86:163-173.
16. Basow SA, Cahill KF, Phelan JE, Longshore K, McGillicuddy-DeLisa A. 2007. Perceptions of relational and physical aggression among college students: Effects of gender of perpetrator, target, and perceiver. Psychol Women Q 31:85-95.
17. Berkowitz L. 1982. Violence and rule-following behaviour. In:Marsh P, Campbell A (eds). Aggression and Violence. Oxford: Blackwell, pp 91-101.
18. Berkowitz L. 1983. Aversively-stimulated aggression. Am Psychol 38:1135-1144.
19. Berkowitz L. 1989. Frustration-aggression hypothesis: Examination and reformulation. Psychol Bull 106:59-73.
20. Berkowitz L. 2008. On the consideration of automatic as well as controlled psychological processes in aggression. Aggr Behav 34:117-129.
21. Brophy S. 2006. An investigation into the rational choice model of partner violence. Unpublished B.Sc. Dissertation, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.
22. Daly M, Wilson M. 1988. Homicide. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
23. Daly M, Wilson M. 1990. Killing the competition: Female/female and male/male homicide. Hum Nat 1:81-107.
24. Dobash RE, Dobash RP. 1980. Violence Against Wives: A Case Against the Patriarchy. London: Open Books.
25. Dobash RP, Dobash RE. 2004. Women's violence to men in intimate relationships. Br J Criminol 44:324-349.
26. Eagly AH, Wood W. 2006. Three ways that data can misinform: Inappropriate partialling, small samples, and anyway they're not playing our song. Psychol Inq 17:131-137.
27. Eagly AH, Wood W, Johannesen-Schmidt MC. 2006. Social role theory of sex differences and similarities. Implications for the partner preferences of women and men. In: Eagly AH, Beall A, Sternberg RS (eds). The Psychology of Gender, 2nd edition. New York: Guilford, pp 269-295.
28. Edwards W. 1954. The theory of decision making. Psychol Bull 51: 380-417.
29. El-Zanty F, Hussein EM, Shawky GA, Way AA, Kishor S. 1995. Egypt Demographic and Health Survey 1995. Cairo, Egypt: National Population Council.
30. Feingold A. 1994. Gender differences in personality: A metaanalysis. Psychol Bull 116:429-456.
31. Felson RB. 2002. Violence and Gender Reexamined. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
32. Fernández-Fuertes AA. 2007. Agresiones verbales-emocionales, físicas y sexuales en las relaciones de pareja de los adolescentes: Naturaleza y factores asociados. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
33. Fernández-Fuertes AA, Fuertes A. 2010. Physical and psychological aggression in dating relationships of Spanish adolescents: Motives and consequences. Child Abuse Negl 34:183-191.
34. Fernández-Fuertes AA, Fuertes A, Orgaz B. 2008. El CADRI en el estudio del comportamiento agresivo en las relaciones de pareja adolescentes. In: González-Pienda JA, Núñez-Pérez JC (eds). Psicología y Educación: Un lugar de encuentro. Oviedo, Spain: Universidad de Oviedo, pp 1622-1630.
35. Ferńandez-Fuertes AA, Fuertes A, Pulido RF. 2006. La evaluación de la violencia en las relaciones de pareja adolescentes. Validación del Conflict in Adolescent Dating Relationships Inventory (CADRI), versión española. Int J Clin Health Psychol 6:339-358.
36. Fetchenhauer D, Rohde PA. 2002. Evolutionary personality and victimology: Sex differences in risk attitudes and short-term orientation and their relation to sex differences in victimizations. Evol Hum Behav 23:233-244.
37. Gardner W, Mulvey EP, Shaw EC. 1995. Regression analysis of counts and rates: Poisson, overdispersed, and negative binomial models. Psychol Bull 118:392-404.
38. Glick P, Fiske ST. 1996. The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. J Pers Soc Psychol 70:491-512.
39. Gottfredson MR, Hirshi T. 1990. A General Theory of Crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
40. Graham-Kevan N, Archer J. 2005. Investigating three explanations of women's relationship aggression. Psychol Women Q 29:270-277.
41. Green LR, Richardson DR, Lago T. 1996. How do friendship, indirect, and direct aggression relate? Aggr Behav 22:81-86.
42. Harris RJ, Cook CA. 1994. Attributions about spouse abuse: It matters who the batterers and victims are. Sex Roles 30:553-565.
43. Hilbe JM. 2007. Negative Binomial Regression. New York: Cambridge University Press.
44. Hutchinson MK, Holtman MC. 2005. Analysis of count data using Poisson regression. Res Nurs Health 28:408-418.
45. Ireland JL, Archer J. 2004. Association between measures of aggression and bullying among juvenile and young offenders. Aggr Behav 30:29-42.
46. Johnson-Laird PN, Oatley K. 1992. Basic emotions, rationality, and folk theory. Cogn Emotion 6:201-223.
47. Kirkpatrick LA, Epstein S. 1992. Cognitive-experiential self-theory and subjective probability: Further evidence for two conceptual systems. J Pers Soc Psychol 63:534-544.
48. Lynam DR, Hoyle RH, Newman JP. 2006. The perils of partialling: Cautionary tales from aggression and psychopathy. Assessment 13:328-341.
49. Maynard Smith J. 1982. Evolution and the Theory of Games. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.
50. Medina-Ariza J, Barberet R. 2003. Intimate partner violence in Spain. Violence Against Women 9:302-322.
51. Miller JD, Lynam DR. 2006. Reactive and proactive aggression: Similarities and differences. Pers Individ Diff 41:1469-1480.
52. Muñoz-Rivas MJ, Graña JL, O'Leary KD, González MP. 2007. Aggression in adolescent dating relationships: Prevalence, justification, and health consequences. J Adolesc Health 40:298-304.
53. Patton JH, Stanford MS, Barratt ES. 1995. Factor structure of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale. J Clin Psychol 51:768-774.
54. Perry DG, Perry LC, Weiss TJ. 1989. Sex differences in the consequences that children anticipate for aggression. Dev Psychol 25:312-319.
55. Raine A, Dodge K, Loeber R, Gatzke-Kopp L, Lynam DR, Reynolds C, Stouthamer-Loeber M, Liu J. 2006. The reactiveproactive aggression questionnaire: Differential correlates of reactive and proactive aggression in adolescent boys. Aggr Behav 32:159-171.
56. Richardson DR, Green LR. 1999. Social sanction and threat explanations of gender effects on direct and indirect aggression. Aggr Behav 25:425-434.
57. Richardson DR, Green LR. 2003. Defining direct and indirect aggression: The Richardson Conflict Response Questionnaire. Int Rev Soc Psychol 16:11-30.
58. Richetin J, Richardson DR. 2008. Automatic processes and individual differences in aggressive behavior. Aggr Violent Behav 13:423-430.
59. Rutter A, Hine DW. 2005. Sex differences in workplace aggression: An investigation of moderation and mediation effects. Aggr Behav 31:254-270.
60. Sell A, Tooby J, Cosmides L. 2009. Formidability and the logic of human anger. PANAS 106:15073-15078.
61. Simon TR, Anderson M, Thompson MP, Crosby AE, Shelley G, Sacks JJ. 2001. Attitudinal acceptance of intimate partner violence among US students. Violence Vict 16:115-126.
62. Sorenson SB, Taylor CA. 2005. Female aggression toward male intimate partners: An examination of social norms in a community-based sample. Psychol Women Q 29:78-96.
63. Strack F, Deutsch R. 2004. Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 8:220-247.
64. Straus MA. 1979. Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics (CT) Scales. J Marriage Fam 41:75-88.
65. Straus MA, Ramirez IL. 2007. Gender symmetry in prevalence, severity, and chronicity of physical aggression against dating partners by university students in Mexico and USA. Aggr Behav 33:281-290.
66. Straus MA, Hamby SL, Boney-McCoy S, Sugarman DB. 1996. The revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2): Development and preliminary psychometric data. J Fam Issues 17:283-316.
67. Tangney JP, Baumeister RF, Boone AL. 2004. High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. J Pers 72:271-322.
68. Taylor CA, Sorenson SB. 2005. Community-based norms about intimate partner violence: Putting attributions of fault and responsibility into context. Sex Roles 53:573-589.
69. Taylor SP, Epstein S. 1967. Aggression as a function of the interaction of the sex of the aggressor and the sex of the victim. J Pers 35:474-485.
70. Tedeschi JT, Felson RB. 1994. Violence, Aggression, and Coercive Actions. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
71. Wolfe DA, Scott K, Reitzel-Jaffe D, Wekerle C, Grasley C, Straatman A-L. 2001. Development and validation of the conflict in adolescent dating relationships inventory. Psychol Assess 13:277-293.
72. World Health Organization. 2002. World Report on Violence and Health. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO.
73. Zajonc RB. 1980. Feeling and thinking: preferences need no inferences. Am Psychol 35:151-175.