Analyzing communities of web services using incentives

International Journal of Web Services Research

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 30-51

  Khosravifar, Babak ^a   Bentahar, Jamal ^a   Moazin, Ahmad ^a   Thiran, Philippe ^b  

^a Gina Cody School of Engineering and Computer Science   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NAMUR   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Autonomous Agents; Communities; Incentives; Reputation; Trust; Web Services

Indexed keywords

COMMUNITIES; COMMUNITY RESPONSIVENESS; DYNAMIC ENVIRONMENTS; EFFECTIVE MECHANISMS; EMPIRICAL RESULTS; EVALUATION METRICS; INCENTIVES; INDIVIDUAL AGENT; LOGGING MECHANISM; REASONING CAPABILITIES; REPUTATION; TRUST; USER AGENTS;

DESIGN; FUZZY CLUSTERING; WEB SERVICES;

AUTONOMOUS AGENTS;

EID: 77956287495     PISSN: 15457362     EISSN: 15465004     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4018/jwsr.2010070102     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. rd European Conference on Web Services (ECOWS), Växjö, Sweden (pp. 38-40).
2. nd IEEE international Conference on Advanced information networking and application (AINA), Okinawa, Japan (pp. 1603-1608).
3. Fourguet, E., Larson, K., & Cowan, W. (2006). A Reputation Mechanism for Layered Communities. SIGecom Exchanges, 6(1), 11-22. doi:10.1145/1150735. 1150738
4. Jurca, R., & Faltings, B. (2003, June 24-27). An Incentive Compatible Reputation Mechanism. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on E-Commerce Technology (CEC), Newport Beach, CA (pp. 1026- 1027).
5. Jurca, R., & Faltings, B. (2007). Obtaining Reliable Feedbacks for Sanctioning Reputation Mechanisms. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 29(1), 391-419.
6. th International World Wide Web Conference (WWW), Banff, Canada (pp. 1003-1011).
7. th international Conference on Web Information Systems Engineering Workshops, Rome, Italy (pp. 131-139).
8. th International Workshop for Coordination, Organization, Institutions, and Norms in Agent Systems (COIN@IJCAI), Pasadena, CA.
9. th International Conference on Web Services (ICWS), Los Angeles (pp. 303-310).
10. th International joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS), Budapest, Hungary (pp. 1017-1024).
11. th International World Wise Conference on Alternate Track Papers and Posters (pp. 66-73).
12. th International Conference on Web Information Systems Engineering (WISE), Nancy, France (pp. 38-49).
13. Martino, L. D., & Bertino, E. (2009). Security for Web Services: Standards and Research Issues. International Journal of Web Services Research, 6(4), 48-74.
14. st Workshop on Service-Oriented Computing and agent-based Engineering (SOCABE), Utrecht, The Netherlands.
15. Maximilien, E. M., & Singh, M. (2002). Conceptual Model of Web Service Reputation. SIGMOD Record, 31(4), 36-41. doi:10.1145/637411.637417
16. Organization for the advanced of structured information standards. (2004). Introduction to UDDI: Important Features and Functional Concepts. Retrieved October 12, 2009, from http://www.oasis-open.org
17. Weaver, A., & Wu, Z. (2006). Using Web Service Enhancement to Establish Trust Relationships with Privacy Protection . International Journal of Web Services Research, 6(1), 49-68.
18. Zhang, L.-J. (2008). Web Services Security, Composition, and Discovery. International Journal of Web Services Research, 5(1), 1-23.