Deaf students and their classroom communication: An evaluation of higher order categorical interactions among school and background characteristics

Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 334-347

  Allen, Thomas E ^a   Anderson, Melissa L ^a  

^a GALLAUDET UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; AGE; ARTICLE; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CHILD; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; COGNITION; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; DECISION TREE; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; PARENT; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PATIENT; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SCHOOL; SIGN LANGUAGE; SOCIALIZATION; SPEECH; STATISTICAL MODEL; TEACHING;

ADOLESCENT; AGE FACTORS; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CHILD; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; COGNITION; COMMUNICATION; CULTURE; DEAFNESS; DECISION TREES; HEARING IMPAIRED PERSONS; HUMANS; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; PARENTS; SCHOOLS; SIGN LANGUAGE; SOCIALIZATION; SPEECH; TEACHING;

EID: 77956280433     PISSN: 10814159     EISSN: 14657325     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/deafed/enq034     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Archbold, S., Nikolopoulos, T., O'Donoghue, G., & Lutman, M. (1998). Educational placement of deaf children following cochlear implantation. British Journal of Audiology, 32, 295-300.
2. Easterbrooks, S.R., & Baker, S. (2002). Language learning in children who are deaf and hard of hearing: Multiple pathways. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
3. Garrett, P.B., & Baquedano-Lopez, P. (2002). Language socialization: Reproduction and continuity, transformation and change. Annual Review of Anthropology, 31, 339-361.
4. Karchmer, M.A., & Mitchell, R.E. (2003). Demographic achievement characteristics of deaf and hard-of-hearing students. In M. Marschark & P.E. Spencer (Eds.), Oxford handbook of deaf studies, language, and education (pp. 21-37). New York: Oxford University Press.
5. Marschark, M., & Hauser, P.C. (2008). Cognitive underpinnings of learning by deaf and hard-of-hearing students: Differences, diversity, and directions. In M. Marschark & P.C. Hauser (Eds.), Deaf cognition: Foundations and outcomes (pp. 3-23). New York: Oxford University Press.
6. Mitchell, R.E., & Karchmer, M.A. (2004). When parents are deaf versus hard of hearing: Patterns of sign use and school placement of deaf and hard-of-hearing children. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 9, 133-152.
7. Osberger, M.J., Miyamoto, R.T., Zimmerman-Phillips, S., Kemink, J.L., Stroer, B.S., Firszt, J.B., et al. (1991). Independent evaluation of the speech perception abilities of children with the Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant system. Ear and Hearing, 12(Suppl.), 66S-80S.
8. Spencer, P.E., & Marschark, M. (2003). Cochlear implants: Issues and implications. In M. Marschark & P.E. Spencer (Eds.), Oxford handbook of deaf studies, language, and education (pp. 434-448). New York: Oxford University Press.
9. Stinson, M.S., & Kluwin, T.N. (2003). Educational consequences of alternative schools placements. In M. Marschark & P.E. Spencer (Eds.), Oxford handbook of deaf studies, language, and education (pp. 52-64). New York: Oxford University Press.
10. Tyler, R. (1990). Speech perception with the Nucleus cochlear implant in children trained with the auditory/verbal approach. American Journal of Otology, 11, 99-107.