The influence of a collaborative procurement approach using integrated design in construction on project team performance

International Journal of Managing Projects in Business

Volumn 2, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 370-385

  Forgues, Daniel ^a   Koskela, Lauri ^b  

^a ÉCOLE DE TECHNOLOGIE SUPÉRIEURE   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SALFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Construction industry; Procurement; Project management; Team working

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956273236     PISSN: 17538378     EISSN: 17538386     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/17538370910971036     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Ancona, D.G., Kochan, T.A., Scully, M. and Maanen, J.V. (2004), Managing for the Future: Organizational Behavior and Processes, South-Western College Publishing, Cincinnati, OH.
2. Austin, S.A., Baldwin, A., Hammond, J., Murray, M., Root, D., Thomson, D. and Thorpe, A. (2001), Design Chains: A Handbook for Integrated Collaborative Design, Thomas Telford, London.
3. Blackler, F., Crump, N. and Mcdonald, S. (1999), “Managing experts and competing through innovation: an activity theoretical analysis”, Organization, Vol. 6, pp. 5-31.
4. Bucciarell, L. (1996), Designing Engineers, MIT Press, New York, NY.
5. Carlile, P.R. (2002), “A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: boundary objects in new product development”, Organization Science, Vol. 13, pp. 442-55.
6. Carlile, P.R. (2004), “Transferring, translating, and transforming: an integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries”, Organization Science, Vol. 15, pp. 555-68.
7. Druskat, U. and Kayes, D.C. (2000), “Learning versus performance in short-term project teams”, Small Group Research, Vol. 31, pp. 328-53.
8. Druskat, U. and Pescosolido, A. (2002), “The content of effective teamwork mental models in self-managing teams: ownership, learning and heedful interrelating”, Human Relations, Vol. 55, pp. 283-314.
9. Dupagne, A. (1991), “Computer integrated building”, Strategic Final Report, Exploratory Action No. 5604, ESPRIT II.
10. Egan, J. (1998), Rethinking Construction: The Report of the Construction Task Force, HMSO, London.
11. Engeström, Y., Engeström, R. and Karkkainen, T. (1995), “Polycontextuality and boundary crossing in expert cognition: learning and problem solving in complex work activities”, Learning and Instruction, Vol. 5, pp. 319-36.
12. Forgues, D. (2008), Using Boundary Objects to Generate Better Value in the Construction Industry, School of the Built Environment, University of Salford, Salford.
13. Glynne, P. (2006), “Benefits management-changing the focus of delivery”, Association for Progress Management Yearbook 2006/07, pp. 45-9.
14. Huovila, P., Koskela, L. and Lautanala, M. (1997), “Fast or concurrent: the art of getting construction improved”, in Alarcón, L. (Ed.), Lean Construction, Taylor & Francis Group, Rotterdam, pp. 143-60.
15. Koskela, L. (2000), An Exploration Towards a Production Theory and its Application to Construction, Technical Research Center of Finland, Espoo.
16. Koskela, L. and Howell, G. (2008), “The underlying theory of project management is obsolete”, IEEE Engineering Management Review, Vol. 36, pp. 22-34.
17. Koskela, L., Howell, G. and Lichtig, W. (2006), “Contracts and production”, paper presented at Symposium on Sustainability and Value through Construction Procurement, CIBW92 Procurement Systems, CIBW, Salford.
18. Koskinen, K. and Makinen, S. (2009), “Role of boundary objects in negotiations of project contracts”, International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 27, pp. 31-8.
19. Langley, A. (1999), “Strategies for theorizing from process data”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 24, pp. 691-710.
20. Larsson, N. (2002), “The integrated design process”, paper presented at Report on a National Workshop, Natural Resources Canada, Ottawa.
21. Latham, S.M. (1994), “Constructing the team”, Final Report of the Government/Industry Review of Procurement and Contractual Arrangements in the UK Construction Industry, HMSO, London.
22. Lawson, B. (2006), How Designers Think: The Design Process Demystified, Architectural Press, Oxford.
23. Löhnert, G., Dalkowski, A. and Sutter, W. (2002), “Integrated design process”, A Guideline for Sustainable and Solar-Optimised Building Design, Task 23, IEA, Berlin.
24. Moore, D.R. and Dainty, A.R.J. (2001), “Intra-team boundaries as inhibitors of performance improvement in UK design and build projects: a call for change”, Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 19, pp. 559-62.
25. Nardi, B.A. (1996), “Studying context: a comparison of activity theory, situated action models, and distributed cognition”, Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human-Computer Interaction, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 69-102.
26. Patton, M.Q. (2002), Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
27. Pellegrinelli, S., Partington, D., Hemingway, C., Mohdzain, Z. and Shah, M. (2007), “The importance of context in programme management: an empirical review of programme practices”, International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 25, pp. 41-55.
28. PMI (2003), Organisational Project Management Maturity Model, Project Management Institute, Newton Square, PA.
29. PMI (2004), The Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge, Project Management Institute, Newton Square, PA.
30. Rodrigues, A. and Bowers, J. (1996), “The role of system dynamics in project management”, International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 14, pp. 213-20.
31. Schön, D.A. (1995), The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action, Ashgate Pub Co., New York, NY.
32. Smulders, F., Lousberg, L. and Dorst, K. (2008), “Towards different communication in collaborative design”, International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, Vol. 1, pp. 352-67.
33. Stasser, G. and Titus, W. (1987), “Effects of information load and percentage of shared information on the dissemination of unshared information during group discussion”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 53, pp. 81-93.
34. Thorp, J. (2003), The Information Paradox: Realizing the Business Benefits of Information, McGraw-Hill Ryerson, Whitby.
35. Tory, M., Staub-French, S., Po, B.A. and Wu, F. (2008), Physical and Digital Artifact-Mediated Coordination in Building Design, Vol. 17, Department of Computer Science, University of Victoria, Victoria, pp. 311-51.
36. Turner, J.R. and Müller, R. (2005), “The project manager's leadership style as a success factor on projects: a literature review”, Project Management Journal, Vol. 36, pp. 49-61.
37. Turner, J.R. and Simister, S.J. (2000), Gower Handbook of Project Management, Gower, Aldershot.
38. van de Ven, A.H. (2007), Engaged Scholarship: Creating Knowledge for Science and Practice, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
39. Walker, D. and Hampson, K. (2003), Procurement Strategies – A Relationship-based Approach, Blackwell Science, Oxford.
40. Weick, K.E. and Roberts, K.H. (1993), “Collective mind in organizations: heedful interrelating on flight decks”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 38, pp. 357-81.
41. Winch, G.M. (2002), Managing Construction Projects, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford.
42. Winter, M. and Szczepanek, T. (2008), “Projects and programmes as value creation processes: a new perspective and some practical implications”, International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 26, pp. 95-103.
43. Zager, D. (2002), “Collaboration as an activity coordinating with pseudo-collective objects”, Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Vol. 11, pp. 181-204.
44. Zimmerman, A. (2006), Guide sur le processus de conception intégrée, Société canadienne d'hypothèques et de logement (SCHL), Toronto.