Examining the feasibility and efect of transitioning GED tests to computer

Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 1-33

  Higgins, Jennifer ^a   Patterson, Margaret Becker ^b   Bozman, Martha ^b   Katz, Michael ^a  

^a Nimble Assessment Systems   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956272147     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15402525     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Editors, (2009). Technology Counts 2009, Education Week, downloaded on June 20, 2009 from: http://www.edweek.org/ew/toc/2009/03/26/index.htm.
2. GED Testing Service. (2008). Policies and procedures manual. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
3. GED Testing Service. (2010). 2009 GED testing program statistical report. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
4. George-Ezzelle, C., & Hsu, Y. (2006). GED candidate computer familiarity survey. (GED Testing Service Research Studies 2006-2). Washington, DC: GED Testing Service.
5. George-Ezzelle, C., & Skaggs, G. (2004). Examining the validity of GED Tests scores with scheduling and setting accommodations. (GED Testing Service Research Studies 2004-1). Washington, DC: GED Testing Service.
6. Hsu, Y., & George-Ezzelle, C. (2008). The literacy of U.S. adults with disabilities across GED credential recipients, high school graduates, and non-high school graduates. (GED Testing Service Research Studies 2008-3). Washington, DC: GED Testing Service.
7. Landau, S., Russell, M., Gourgey, K., Erin, J., & Cowan, J. (2003). Use of the Talking Tactile Tablet in mathematics testing. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 97(2) 85-96.
8. Lohman, C., Lyons, R., & Dunham, M., 2020, Disabilities and the GED: An analysis of pass rates, accommodations, and test scores. Murray, KY: Murray State University.
9. Mellard, D., & Patterson, M.B. (2008). Contrasting adult literacy learners with and without speciic learning disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 29(3), 133-144